sissy-boy
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,321
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Felicity said:I didn't respond to the first or the last in your "series" because, really, they are irrelevant.
They were INDEED relevant. The FACT of the matter is that you chose not to answer them because you KNEW it would make you appear very hypocritical.
So I will ask you in another way. Would you REQUIRE a mother by law, to take a medication that would save her and her unborn child's life?? If not, then how about if the drug could possibly save her life but not the child's or vice-versa? If yes, then would you then want to pass a law that would require ALL people to take drugs to protect their lives? Is the 'sanctity' of life only afforded to the 'unborn'??
Why or why not?
And PLEASE, try to be honest.