- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
- Messages
- 5,435
- Reaction score
- 1,675
- Location
- PA
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The judge who wrote the decision said “The new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical precision”
That was because the law considered drivers licences and state IDs acceptable, but not government issued public assistance cards, which have never been recognised as a form of legal id.
So I ask you again, why do those of you on the left feel that it's too difficult for black people to obtain a drivers license, state ID, passport or military ID in order to vote, but don't think it's difficult for white people to do so?
Correct he said it targets them along with low income . . .odd you didn't talk about the many other things discussed. I wonder why???? The rest of your idiotic assumption is a strawman because you made it up. What are you having trouble understanding? Your made up reasoning is NOT his reasoning or what they found hahaha try again. Do you honestly think anybody will fall for the amount of dishonesty in you post? You can ask your question 100 times it's still made up, you might want to actually look into the whole situation so you don't come of so ignorant and dishonest about this subject
When you have anything that supports this dishonest post below you let us know because the ignorance and dishonesty in it is completely imbecilic.
I find it very telling that democrats have such a low opinion of black people, that they feel they aren't capable of obtaining a legal ID, of knowing what precinct they are supposed to vote in, see them as too lazy to register to vote before election day, and not responsible enough to show up on election day, therefore needing a week of election days.
So would someone explain to me again, why it is black people keep voting democrat?
.