AOC outrages LGBTQ advocates over suggested post office renaming

[RetiredUSN]

Keep on trying to deflect from your crazy comments about AOC. It just proves my point.

Keep deflecting away form the hypocrisy that is readily available for everyone to see in your own postings history.

 

[Lloyd Christmas]

Maybe y'all Lefty's hate Trump because you cant date him.

It sounds just as stupid.

To idiots maybe, because all the hate of Trump are based on actual facts, his actual shitty personality, his shitty behavior, his incompetence, criminal activity, unlike the right that just hates anybody who is a liberal and have to rely on garbage, fake attacks on AOC

see, that's how you make an argument, but it requires typing more than a few words at a time, and having one

 

[Linc]

Maybe I should be more grateful for the trouble she causes Pelosi. But she's an example of the socialist scumbags we don't need in America.

We certainly don’t need kkkonfed kkkonserv boot-licking GOPutiNazis that follow Vlad, Xi, and traitor trump.

 

[Rawley]

Shre is naming it after another LGBTQ icon. I don't see much of a difference.

You should read the story. The former city council member, who fought to get the PO named in the first place, explains that she's unnecessarily pitting one group of LGBTers against another.

When exactly did the GOP start to care about the opinions of LGBTQ people?

What does the GOP have to do with this?

 

[Phys251]

Keep deflecting away form the hypocrisy that is readily available for everyone to see in your own postings history.

An empty threat from the person who posted this:

Why?

It would be like kissing Mr. Ed


View attachment 67376471

 

[noonereal]

AOC outrages LGBTQ advocates over suggested post office renaming

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., outraged LGBTQ advocates in her Queens district last week after she suggested renaming a local post office that honors a woman who co-founded the first organization for parents of gay and lesbian children in 1973 and her husband, according to reports.

www.foxnews.com

This is what happens when you get a never-in-touch, virtue signaler, (with no brain) like AOC elected into office. I wonder how she'll extricate herself from her usually foolish position this time.

You can disagree with her agenda, I do. But if you call her stupid (no brain) that is an indictment on you.

 

[Lisa]

You should read the story. As the former city council member, who fought to get the PO named in the first place, she's unnecessarily pitting one group of LGBTers against another.



What does the GOP have to do with this?

Did you not see the Fox News/GOPTV link in the OP?

 

[Linc]

Hmmmmm

I hate Putin.

But here you go again as usual................... with the urge to say some thing even if it's as ignorant as possible.

You love Putin. You support trump’s treason, as do those down at the American Legion doing a disservice to their service.

 

[CLAX1911]

AOC outrages LGBTQ advocates over suggested post office renaming

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., outraged LGBTQ advocates in her Queens district last week after she suggested renaming a local post office that honors a woman who co-founded the first organization for parents of gay and lesbian children in 1973 and her husband, according to reports.

www.foxnews.com

This is what happens when you get a never-in-touch, virtue signaler, (with no brain) like AOC elected into office. I wonder how she'll extricate herself from her usually foolish position this time.

You're only allowed to be outraged if you agree with AOC.

 

[Lloyd Christmas]

Keep deflecting away form the hypocrisy that is readily available for everyone to see in your own postings history.

LOL, now he is posting the equivalent of "i know you are but what am I"

LOL What an embarrassment

You're only allowed to be outraged if you agree with AOC.

LOL, Another person who just chimes in with moronic one liners and has no idea the content of the thread. The so called "outraged" is fabricated by Fox news

 

[Rawley]

Did you not see the Fox News/GOPTV link in the OP?

I saw the story was reported on foxnews.com. I don't know what GOPTV is.

Are you saying that FoxNews shouldn't be reporting on AOC? On LGBT issues? What are you saying?

 

[RetiredUSN]

LOL, now he is posting the equivalent of "i know you are but what am I"

LOL What an embarrassment

AOC doesn't need me to prove what a dipshit shit is.

 

[Integrityrespec]

AOC outrages LGBTQ advocates over suggested post office renaming

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., outraged LGBTQ advocates in her Queens district last week after she suggested renaming a local post office that honors a woman who co-founded the first organization for parents of gay and lesbian children in 1973 and her husband, according to reports.

www.foxnews.com

This is what happens when you get a never-in-touch, virtue signaler, (with no brain) like AOC elected into office. I wonder how she'll extricate herself from her usually foolish position this time.

She is a college educated dumbass. She does't do her homework on issues and has some far out ideas. She is an example of being the face of a campaign that someone else runs, organizes and puts forth all the talking points.

 

[Lloyd Christmas]

She is a college educated dumbass. She does't do her homework on issues and has some far out ideas. She is an example of being the face of a campaign that someone else runs, organizes and puts forth all the talking points.

says a likely high school dropout LOL

Sorry, you can't diminish her stellar education and grades, her at such a young age unseating a long time incumbent and getting elected. it just makes you look bad and petty

 

[Lisa]

I saw the story was reported on foxnews.com. I don't know what GOPTV is.

Are you saying that FoxNews shouldn't be reporting on AOC? On LGBT issues? What are you saying?

I would suggest that you give her equal time with the 435 other members of the House of Repr4esenatives instead of having her take over the GPOP position of We Hate Hillary to now bing We Hate AOC. Maybe Trump could change lock AOC up.

This is the first that I have heard of this. It wasn't even on Facebook, NPR or daily spam from HuffPo or KOS. You are obsessed with AOC.

 

[Rawley]

I would suggest that you give her equal time with the 435 other members of the House of Rep[r4esenatives instead of having her take over the GPOP position of We Hate Hillary to now bing We Hate AOC. Maybe Trump could change lock AOC up.

Hard to believe it, but perhaps you are unaware of the power AOC has in your party. More than a few progressive pundits have opined that could defeat Schumer for one the NY Senate seats. So yes, Fox and all the other media outlets covering politics do give her significant coverage commensurate with her power in your party.

Compare that with the bizarre obsession of the liberal media with Marjorie Taylor Greene. She has virtually zero power in the GOP caucus, but the amount of coverage of her by the liberal media is ridiculous.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

Hard to believe it, but perhaps you are unaware of the power AOC has in your party. More than a few progressive pundits have opined that could defeat Schumer for one the NY Senate seats. So yes, Fox and all the other media outlets covering politics do give her significant coverage commensurate with her power in your party.

Compare that with the bizarre obsession of the liberal media with Marjorie Taylor Greene. She has virtually zero power in the GOP caucus, but the amount of coverage of her by the liberal media is ridiculous.

AOC and Marjorie Taylor-Green have the exact same amount of actual power. They're both low-senority Congresswomen.

The only difference is which side you're on.

 

[Lisa]

Hard to believe it, but perhaps you are unaware of the power AOC has in your party. More than a few progressive pundits have opined that could defeat Schumer for one the NY Senate seats. So yes, Fox and all the other media outlets covering politics do give her significant coverage commensurate with her power in your party.

Compare that with the bizarre obsession of the liberal media with Marjorie Taylor Greene. She has virtually zero power in the GOP caucus, but the amount of coverage of her by the liberal media is ridiculous.

MTG goes out of her way to get national media coverage and they give her those 15 seconds to say something shockingly stupid. I seldom hear conservatives condemning her idiocy.

 

[Rawley]

AOC and Marjorie Taylor-Green have the exact same amount of actual power. They're both low-senority Congresswomen.

The only difference is which side you're on.

You funny. They have the same seniority. But to say they have the same amount of power in their party is ridiculous.

 

[Rawley]

MTG goes out of her way to get national media coverage and they give her those 15 seconds to say something shockingly stupid. I seldom hear conservatives condemning her idiocy.

Because we don't care. Again, because she has no power in the party. McCarthy starts saying crazy shit, we'll comment.

 

[Lisa]

Because we don't care. Again, because she has no power in the party. McCarthy starts saying crazy shit, we'll comment.

Or maybe you agree with MTG.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

You funny. They have the same seniority. But to say they have the same amount of power in their party is ridiculous

"Power in their party" is a meaningless phrase outside that party - and it is otherwise inaccurate that AOC has "power" within the Democratic Party.

AOC and MTG have exactly the same power to affect the lives of the average American. Decrying the "liberal" media's coverage of MTG while justifying the same (arguably worse) coverage of AOC by the "conservative" media is silly and transparent.

 

[Rawley]

"Power in their party" is a meaningless phrase outside that party - and it is otherwise inaccurate that AOC has "power" within the Democratic Party.

AOC and MTG have exactly the same power to affect the lives of the average American. Decrying the "liberal" media's coverage of MTG while justifying the same (arguably worse) coverage of AOC by the "conservative" media is silly and transparent.

REally? AOC virtually single-handedly drove Amazon to cancel a facility that would have employed 25-40,000 people in Long Island City. Got any similar accomplishments by MJT that "affect the lives of the average American?"

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

REally? AOC virtually single-handedly drove Amazon to cancel a facility that would have employed 25-40,000 people on Long Island. Got any similar accomplishments by MJT

Not a single aspect of this post is accurate. It's almost fractally wrong. That is quite a feat.

AOC didn't "single-handedly" do anything at all, the facility wouldn't have come close to employing 40,000 people, and it was going to be in Queens - a borough of NYC, not "Long Island."

Most importantly - No one wanted Amazon here.

(Yes, I am aware that Queens is physically on the island "Long Island." Doesn't matter.)

 

[Rawley]

Not a single aspect of this post is accurate. It's almost fractally wrong. That is quite a feat.

AOC didn't "single-handedly" do anything at all, the facility wouldn't have come close to employing 40,000 people, and it was going to be in Queens - a borough of NYC, not "Long Island."

Most importantly - No one wanted Amazon here.

(Yes, I am aware that Queens is physically on the island "Long Island." Doesn't matter.)

Unusual for you to display such ignorance in your posts. Condescension and pretentiousness we've come to expect. But not ignorance. You'd be hard pressed to find articles describing Amazon's cancellation of that headquarters that doesn't mention her by name. For every one or two you find, there are 100 that name her as the principle cause.