• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Anti War/Anti Troop rally in Washingtond DC

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I am watching this farce right now on CSPAN.......Cindy Sheehan just got a standing ovation...........Now there is a speaker asking to free the Cuban 5........International ANSWER tgat Communist Organization funded by North Korea just made a speech..............There was a Muslim Speaker saying free the Muslims in our prisons...........The next speaker is from Italy and says get our troops out of Italy.......Now International ANSWER is back......

I am trying to figure out what all this has to do with the war in Iraq....Maybe some of you lefties call enlighten me.....
 
Now there is some Filipino blaming the USA for eveything wrong in the world...........She just started a chant..........U.S. are imperialists number 1 terrorists..........Its unbelieveable......

Now we have a speaker from Haiti....He is praising Hugo Chavez and asking for handouts from this Country for Haiti..........

Now there is a speaker from Nicuaraga (Not sure of the spelling)He is now slamming our troops and getting a standing ovation and preaching revolution...

Now there is a speaker talking about police brutality, political prisoners and rascism.......

Now there is actually a speaker who says she speaks for Socialism......

I ask you , what does this have to do with the war in iraq?

This rally is a non issue.........They just panned the crowd........No one is there except a bunch of Commnists and Socialists.......
 
Last edited:
This rally is a non issue.........They just panned the crowd........No one is there except a bunch of Commnists and Socialists.......

If it were a non-issue, would you be making it one? You both initiated a posting and added a reply to your own posting,so you give every indication that it IS an issue for you. Otherwise,why post?


AS far as I'm concerned, it is a good thing, indeed, that there are so few in the crowd. People aren't giving these nutjobs the time of day.

Since they do not represent anybody but the fringe wackjobs, then why should anybody defend them?
 
If it were a non-issue, would you be making it one? You both initiated a posting and added a reply to your own posting,so you give every indication that it IS an issue for you. Otherwise,why post?


AS far as I'm concerned, it is a good thing, indeed, that there are so few in the crowd
. People aren't giving these nutjobs the time of day.

Since they do not represent anybody but the fringe wackjobs, then why should anybody defend them?


So few in the crowd what? Nutjobs........Are you kidding me? Cindy Sheehan and her profanities and anti U.S. rhetoric gets a standing ovation?

You Lefties have great leaders........:roll:
 
You Lefties have great leaders........:roll:

Let's see -- Here I call them fringe wack jobs, yet you determine that since you consider me a lefty, these people are my leaders?

You're getting pretty desperate there, man.
 
I was actually at the rally, and the numbers were approximately 15-20000 people. there would have bee†n more, but the poor weather in the northeast kept a LOT of people away.

As far as the relevance of the issues spoken about, they are actually quite relevant. The rally was not just about Iraq, but it was about the closing of Guantanamo Bay, the US embargo on Cuba, the occupation of Haiti, etc. The Answer Coalition posters stated this. Basically, the rally was against US imperialism in general, be it economic, political, or by the military.

In short, the rally was against the continued building of hegemony by the United States. The fact that the US makes up a very small portion of the World population but consumes more than 40% of the World's resources is a problem, and also a reason why the US is hated across the world.

The rally addresses the reasons of why "they hate us." The bottom line is that the world community hates us because the people that live in the oppressed countries, such as those in the middle east, believe that the United States supports oppressive and brutal dictators and contrary to what is said, do not support democratic institutions in developing nations. This was the reason for the rally, and I believe that it was a just one.
 
I was actually at the rally, and the numbers were approximately 15-20000 people. there would have bee†n more, but the poor weather in the northeast kept a LOT of people away.

As far as the relevance of the issues spoken about, they are actually quite relevant. The rally was not just about Iraq, but it was about the closing of Guantanamo Bay, the US embargo on Cuba, the occupation of Haiti, etc. The Answer Coalition posters stated this. Basically, the rally was against US imperialism in general, be it economic, political, or by the military.

In short, the rally was against the continued building of hegemony by the United States. The fact that the US makes up a very small portion of the World population but consumes more than 40% of the World's resources is a problem, and also a reason why the US is hated across the world.

The rally addresses the reasons of why "they hate us." The bottom line is that the world community hates us because the people that live in the oppressed countries, such as those in the middle east, believe that the United States supports oppressive and brutal dictators and contrary to what is said, do not support democratic institutions in developing nations. This was the reason for the rally, and I believe that it was a just one.

Well there's nothing quite like talking to someone involved in these things. But to read your reasonable response here is a far cry from the vehemence displayed at these rally's, which gives less credence to the topic being brought up. It's certainly a legitimate concern, but I'll tell you right up front, I wouldn't listen to Cindy Sheehan, or a lot of people due to their actions. They show themselves to be nothing more than opportunists, who're probably being used for political purposes and happily so.

For a legitimate voice to be hard on such an important topic as this (America's overstepping it's bounds), polarizing people shouting in the streets is a failure. Shouting and chanting obscenities about the U.S. is a losing preposition, and further alienates the people who truly have the best interest of this country in mind, and further guarantees they won't be heard.

I won't listen to that garbage. But what you just wrote, reasonably and rationally is something different. Something worth considering, and that tells the story of importance of delivery. Of course facts are necessary, but getting people to listen is the first step.
 
Well there's nothing quite like talking to someone involved in these things. But to read your reasonable response here is a far cry from the vehemence displayed at these rally's, which gives less credence to the topic being brought up. It's certainly a legitimate concern, but I'll tell you right up front, I wouldn't listen to Cindy Sheehan, or a lot of people due to their actions. They show themselves to be nothing more than opportunists, who're probably being used for political purposes and happily so.

For a legitimate voice to be hard on such an important topic as this (America's overstepping it's bounds), polarizing people shouting in the streets is a failure. Shouting and chanting obscenities about the U.S. is a losing preposition, and further alienates the people who truly have the best interest of this country in mind, and further guarantees they won't be heard.

I won't listen to that garbage. But what you just wrote, reasonably and rationally is something different. Something worth considering, and that tells the story of importance of delivery. Of course facts are necessary, but getting people to listen is the first step.

I agree. I do not listen to Cindy Sheehan either or the others who continually spout the same crap over and over again about the war and imperialism in general being based on lies of the Bush administration.

As far as the effectiveness of protest, I think that is has the potential to at the very least draw attention to certain issues. I think that the speakers should have been people who are more qualified to critique the United States' foreign policy than what was offered. I think ideas such as the fact that the US embargo of Cuba has been condemned as a massive human rights violation by the world community should be brought to light. I think that people need to be shown that they need to look beyond the Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC news stations in order to get the real truth about issues. If the protests can keep these aims in focus, then a much bigger reaction on the part of the American people would be within reach.

The fact is that the only way to end the war and to draw attention to these issues of imperialism is to shut down important institutions in the country. For example, students should hold strikes and shut down universities and high schools. Unions should call for general strikes to cripple the economy. These are the courses of direct action that should be promoted at these events, not appealing to congress to impeach the President because that is never going to happen.

Americans need to wake up from the apathy that has enslaved them at the hands of the media and government to find out the truth and to make the world a place that everyone can live in and succeed.
 
I agree. I do not listen to Cindy Sheehan either or the others who continually spout the same crap over and over again about the war and imperialism in general being based on lies of the Bush administration.

As far as the effectiveness of protest, I think that is has the potential to at the very least draw attention to certain issues. I think that the speakers should have been people who are more qualified to critique the United States' foreign policy than what was offered. I think ideas such as the fact that the US embargo of Cuba has been condemned as a massive human rights violation by the world community should be brought to light. I think that people need to be shown that they need to look beyond the Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC news stations in order to get the real truth about issues. If the protests can keep these aims in focus, then a much bigger reaction on the part of the American people would be within reach.

The fact is that the only way to end the war and to draw attention to these issues of imperialism is to shut down important institutions in the country. For example, students should hold strikes and shut down universities and high schools. Unions should call for general strikes to cripple the economy. These are the courses of direct action that should be promoted at these events, not appealing to congress to impeach the President because that is never going to happen.

Americans need to wake up from the apathy that has enslaved them at the hands of the media and government to find out the truth and to make the world a place that everyone can live in and succeed.


Apathy it is, and luxury is to blame. Americans have the luxury of apathy because we have all of our toys, and our stomach's are filled. Right now, the world around us is talking points on a news feed, either to be ignored or given mouth honor in regard to commenting on it.

But there is the problem: this country is based on the freedom of the individual to be self determining. The right to be apathetic. The very thing that gives us comfort can very well be the thing that puts an end to our security. The government has become a big faceless body that's supposed to clean up our messes, manage our country's finances and guarantee our safety.

And now, due to too much of that, it certainly seems this administration has taken on the arrogant role of 'we know better what's good for you'. Yes, we need an adminstration that recognizes that the American people do have a voice and a say in policy, but I still have no faith in protests. They smack of the 'screw the system' dead enders of the 60's. The American voice has to evolve too and copying the hippies of a bygone era doesn't feel genuine.

Manipulating truths to force a perception - ala Michael Moore - is flat out insulting to anyone with a shred of intelligence. And insulting and showing true hatred for the country you live in will never give a legitimate worry a moments chance.

I don't think crippling our economy is a way forward, and students striking will only contradict your earlier assertion about people who should be qualified to criticize foreign policy.

I think the issues at hand should be brought forward, like you said people who have armed themselves with the facts about foreign policy and will not accept anyone on their side who, just out of hatred for U.S. policy in general, will join any cause that denigrates it. Someone smart enough to distance him/her self from this kind of vehemence and would rather see a productive way forward. A way that serves the people, but ensures the people are doing their part.
 
Apathy it is, and luxury is to blame. Americans have the luxury of apathy because we have all of our toys, and our stomach's are filled. Right now, the world around us is talking points on a news feed, either to be ignored or given mouth honor in regard to commenting on it.

But there is the problem: this country is based on the freedom of the individual to be self determining. The right to be apathetic. The very thing that gives us comfort can very well be the thing that puts an end to our security. The government has become a big faceless body that's supposed to clean up our messes, manage our country's finances and guarantee our safety.

And now, due to too much of that, it certainly seems this administration has taken on the arrogant role of 'we know better what's good for you'. Yes, we need an adminstration that recognizes that the American people do have a voice and a say in policy, but I still have no faith in protests. They smack of the 'screw the system' dead enders of the 60's. The American voice has to evolve too and copying the hippies of a bygone era doesn't feel genuine.

Manipulating truths to force a perception - ala Michael Moore - is flat out insulting to anyone with a shred of intelligence. And insulting and showing true hatred for the country you live in will never give a legitimate worry a moments chance.

I don't think crippling our economy is a way forward, and students striking will only contradict your earlier assertion about people who should be qualified to criticize foreign policy.

I think the issues at hand should be brought forward, like you said people who have armed themselves with the facts about foreign policy and will not accept anyone on their side who, just out of hatred for U.S. policy in general, will join any cause that denigrates it. Someone smart enough to distance him/her self from this kind of vehemence and would rather see a productive way forward. A way that serves the people, but ensures the people are doing their part.

I do believe that protests have their place. I do not believe that myself, a political activist, shadows the efforts of the hippies. I have an extreme disdain for hippies in fact.

When I say that students should shut down their schools I am making no statements about them being the ones speaking about the foreign policy. The people who speak should be people who are qualified and provide intellectual justification for the things that many of us believe to be true, i.e. US imperialism.

Protests and direct action were the reason that the Vietnam War came to an end. The actions taken on the part of students and activists created such an atmosphere that the United States needed an increase in troops here in America that it was no longer feasible to continue the war.

It is said that we live in a country where as you say, and I believe that you are correct, we can choose to be apathetic. If you want to be apathetic then that is fine, but the issue is that these people who are apathetic DO in fact vote. So people who do not have interest in politics take part, even if it is the menial part of voting, and put people in office whom they have not researched and do not care to research.

We are also taught that in the United States that voting is, and should be the primary, and in many cases only means of political participation. This I think creates the apathy that many Americans experience.

I also believe that just because our country is individualist, that doesn't make it correct. I believe that the reason protests fail in large part in this country is due to our attitude towards the role of the citizen. In Europe, the basis for democratic societies is Rousseau. The idea of the social contract and that the idea of the active citizen should be held above all other matters, especially private matters. Protests are amazingly successful in Europe, especially in France. There is a revolutionary fervor that continues to this day there, and many of the reforms that have arisen are from direct action, protest, and confrontation with illegitimate institutions, such as police and those in power.

A perfect example is the riots about the job security issues France had. I believe it was last year that Chirac approved legislation that greatly decreased the job security for younger people, especially immigrants, and essentially violated the social contract under which they were operating. In reaction to these measures, the people hit the streets for a long string of protests, both peaceful and violent that were unrelenting in nature. The result was that Chirac eventually repealed the piece of legislation and order was once again restored.

I firmly believe that if such legislation were passed in this country, and in fact it has, as one can easily find information on the decline in wages and living conditions for working class people, citizens of this country would merely appeal to legislators to change the law. This passive participation is detrimental to democracy and undermines the social contract.

I would ask you what you believe would be "productive way forward" as you said in your previous post.
 
I am watching this farce right now on CSPAN.......Cindy Sheehan just got a standing ovation...........Now there is a speaker asking to free the Cuban 5........International ANSWER tgat Communist Organization funded by North Korea just made a speech..............There was a Muslim Speaker saying free the Muslims in our prisons...........The next speaker is from Italy and says get our troops out of Italy.......Now International ANSWER is back......

I am trying to figure out what all this has to do with the war in Iraq....Maybe some of you lefties call enlighten me.....
Get it through that thick skull of yours, anti-war is not equal to anti-troop. The only anti-troop is sending these guys into the meat grinder even as this administration and the advocates for this failed war keep on insisting to do.
If anyone is to be called anti-troop, it would be you NP.
 
Protests and direct action were the reason that the Vietnam War came to an end. The actions taken on the part of students and activists created such an atmosphere that the United States needed an increase in troops here in America that it was no longer feasible to continue the war.

.

Yes, and these protests were grass roots instead of something organized andfinanced by an international hate group like ANSWER. Big difference.

THis is precisely why you shouldn't support these rallies -- because they only serve the agenda of those who organize them instead of being reflective of a groundswell of public opinion.

THe protest against the Vietnam war would not have been successful if it had been organized by and reflected the political point of view of those from the outside who aligned themselves with theVietKong. Sure,there were a few extreme people back then, but it was students such as Tod Gitlin (who has spoken out very clearly against this lunatic bunch now organizing these rallies) and countless others who were primarily responsible for the movements success.
 
Get it through that thick skull of yours, anti-war is not equal to anti-troop. The only anti-troop is sending these guys into the meat grinder even as this administration and the advocates for this failed war keep on insisting to do.
If anyone is to be called anti-troop, it would be you NP.
I agree completely. Realize the thread starter yesterday wrote a reply to a question posed directly to him re being in a room with a terrorist and a Democrat ...what would he do if he had a gun and only one bullet.

Navy Pride actually wrote that he would kill the terrorist and then beat the Democrat "to an inch of his death" so is it surprising that he starts threads like this?

Imagine posting in a public forum that you are advocating beating Democrats to a pulp simply because they're Democrats!

That mentality is what leads to associating anti-war with anti-troop. His posts are poisonous, venom filled hate speak that are consistently Anti-American, pro-violence and completely against the values that our soldiers are fighting for in Iraq.

Ironically Navy Pride's point of view is exactly what we're not fighting to protect in Iraq. His posts indicate that his hatred for all different groups of people, Democrats, Liberals, Gays, Muslims, French, Germans, Canadians, Hollywood, US Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen makes him an extremist politically, one who is much closer to our radical enemies than he is to American values.

Ironic in that he has no idea that he represents the far right fringe of America in the same way that Cindy Sheehan represents the far left fringe of America.
 
Get it through that thick skull of yours, anti-war is not equal to anti-troop. The only anti-troop is sending these guys into the meat grinder even as this administration and the advocates for this failed war keep on insisting to do.
If anyone is to be called anti-troop, it would be you NP.

N.P reduces everything to black/white simplicities, paints with an overly broad brush and treats politics as if it were rooting for a football team, but I have to agree with him at least in regards to the one group he mentioned.

Do you know what ANSWER is all about?

Claiming that NO people who are against the war are against the troops is just as short sighted as claiming ALL who are against the war are against
the troops. Now, I don't think you have claimed that, but neither have you acknowleged that there are many who are.

I think it incumbent on any who wish to form an opinion on the subject to learn the players involved. There is a reason these antiwar rallies are little but a steady stream of hackneyed platitudes from those with a whole laundry list of subjects -- because that is all the ANSWER allows. They do not allow Jewish speakers,for instance, if that speaker does not lobby for the destruction of Israel. THey do not allow other speakers for a variety of other reasons, few of which have anything to do with opposing the war. It is their litmus test for fundamentalist purity they place above all else, and they might as well be religious fundies from the extreme right they are so closed minded and dogmatic. They are little but leftist totalitarians.

I don't support these idiots any more than I do the totalitarians of the religious right or totalitarian Islam. It's not just about war -- it's about ideology, and supporting those with totalitarian ideologies *IS* unamerican.
 
I don't support these idiots any more than I do the totalitarians of the religious right or totalitarian Islam. It's not just about war -- it's about ideology, and supporting those with totalitarian ideologies *IS* unamerican.
I agree, there are fringe, radical groups on both sides who do not have a clue and do not have the best interests of our troops in their heart.
 
Anyone think it's easy to get hundreds of thousands of people together in one spot on one day for a common cause? Anti-war rally's happen because the majority of people are sick of the war and want it to end! People that want the war to continue are a small minority of the population.
 
I do believe that protests have their place. I do not believe that myself, a political activist, shadows the efforts of the hippies. I have an extreme disdain for hippies in fact....

I would ask you what you believe would be "productive way forward" as you said in your previous post.

Firstly, it would be for people who truly want a country that's healthy, to wash themselves of anti-American opportunists. Someone chanting anti-American slogans doesn't care for anything but airing a greivance and looking for some form of vengeance. Vengeance isn't a way forward. A foul mouthed tirade might be based on a logic premise, but it's delivery is going to alienate it. Weed out the angry and the opportunistic and find people who actually like what America is and could be, based on what our forefathers had in mind.

I think like Gardner said, people see this as an opportunity to manipulate people and turned protests into organizations, and like everything else, once it becomes an organization, it is susceptible to corruption and abuse.

If a group of people must get together to make their voice known, a less militant display would help. Insulting caricatures and excessive exagerrations on placards is a turn off. Loud doesn't mean right, it just means loud.

I don't believe crippling our economy is a way forward, unless forward means putting America over a barrel. That just means making America vulnerable.

Forward is not only accepting and acknowledging America's flaws and wrong doing's, but changing policy based on it, to insure it doesn't happen in the future. Truly fair market dealings, in the natural resources we buy and in trade. No longer turning a blind eye to dictators because they tow the line and benefit us.

How this is done is making it evident that the American people have no wish to dominate and be 'better', just to be self determining and equal. And fair. Engaging people in public positions, like writers and reporters, in a calm and reasonable manner will garner more attention. Having students do research and write about what they've learned is more productive than striking and closing down schools. Schools are full of resources, having them empty doesn't push things forward.

I'm not a political activist. I'm not a Republican or a Democrat. Nor am I an "Independant". I'm an American. I'm turned off by extremism of any bent, as is the average American, who comprises the majority. The majority cares about this country, because despite our problems, we have it good here. I'd rather be homeless in America than Middle Class in most countries, because no matter how low you go, you can find an opportunity to clean up your act and move forward in America. I'm not saying you can't anywhere else, but I know you can do it here.

If getting the average American to listen and act is priority one, then threatening what we love isn't going to work. Division is contrary to the very name of our country, and the majority doesn't want that.

Resting on one party's excessive denigration of another is not enough. The Democrats have just as much complicity in the war and overall policy as do the Republicans, they're just taking the popular route and washing their hands of the blame.

Calling our government killers and the President Hitler is extremism, and there very well was some valid reasoning for concern before the Iraq invasion, but it was hidden behind cacaphonous minority, that ensures it's agenda will not go forward.

If anything should be protested, it's the elections themselves. Demand that the status quo be broken: A Democrat get's in, the Repubs find ways to make them look bad; a Republican gets in the Democrats get to work plotting a revenge. On and on it goes and it's counter productive and a disservice to the American people. Mainly, because whatever transgression that's going on, both sides know about it and allow it to happen, only to know full well, it will work great as a smear tactic later on. It's a game and the average American is an after thought once their vote is out of the way.
 
Yeah they care about our troops............:roll:
March 17 -- March on Pentagon!:



At exactly the same time that the U.S. government is pretending to be concerned about suffering in the Darfur region of Sudan, it has joined with the European Union (EU) and Israel in seeking to strangle the Palestinian people. While calling for armed intervention to relieve the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, the U.S. and EU have cut off food, medicine and other critically needed materials to the Palestinian people. Israel has sealed off Gaza, one of the most densely populated and impoverished parts of the world; hospitals have run out of many medicines, malnutrition is spreading rapidly and poverty is soaring.




While the focus of the recent years has been to use military power and violence against the Arab people, the Pentagon has been targeting peoples and nations all over the world. U.S. troops occupy South Korea. U.S. nuclear weapons target North Korea. Interventionist actions are already taking place in the Philippines, and are planned against Cuba, Venezuela, and throughout South and Central Asia.
 
Yeah they care about our troops............:roll:
March 17 -- March on Pentagon!:

Well,to their credit, while they do not care about thetroops, they do care about some people

On the board of directors of ANSWER is one Muna Coobtee who is also quite involved in the "free Palestine alliance" that advocates the complete destruction of Israel and is a very strong supporter of Hamas.

But, hey -- they claim to be for peace and anti-racism, and what could be any more peaceful and anti-racist than Hamas?
 
Some thoughts from Gerard van der Leun that are worth your time:

Four years in and the fools in the streets multiply. They are tired of the war, but full of themselves.

It is taking too long.| It will be with you, blowing hot and cold, for decades yet to come.

It is costing too much. | How much will it cost to rebuild a burned and irradiated Los Angeles?

Too many soldiers have died. Even one soldier's death is too much. | What is the nature and duty of a soldier? Is a soldier there only to come in and sandbag a flooded New Orleans? Bring you a Red Cross sandwich and a cup of weak coffee after a tidal wave?

We shall overcome. | Overcome who? Your fellow citizens? Certainly not the enemy. You'll not get over on this one with your Ghandiesque platitudes, unless you are ready to all go like lemmings over the cliff and onto the spikes. You don't strike me as the kind of people with that level of commitment. You strike me as the kind of people who like to prance, rant, and chant, and then go home for a nice chilled Chardonnay and a slab of grilled tofu. Then you spend an hour bitching about Bush before taking a bong hit and sucking up some MTV. I know you well. I was you.

We shall take our no balls and go home. | You will return when your children are slaughtered in their schools. You will return when one of our cities burns. You will return when your cities freeze in the winter, your drinks warm without ice in the summer, your iPods go flat as you walk streets with few lights, when your electricity is rationed, and the shelves of your store are bare. You will return when the crops fail and the trucks cannot run.

Look around you. Everything you have, everything, is there because of oil. The brute fact of the planet right now and into the next few decades is that without oil, the machine that enables you to be you runs on oil. If that oil runs out, your nation, any nation, will do all that it can to get it back. And you will be back not "with peace, but with a sword" of a terrible fire. In your name. In all our names.

It will not be our fault because we marched and spoke up. We moved on. | You have made a festival out of your foolishness if you are young, and, if you are old, out of a yearning for a lost youth you left behind on the last day of 1969. You have carried that yearning forward all your life. You re-enact that foolishness again because you know no other, and you know no better.

"We shall not/ We shall not be blamed." | If we leave because of your pouting and pique, we will return because of your stupidity. There will be blood after and blood later and fire to follow. That war will not take four years. It will take an afternoon at best, but decades of digging out will follow. A million may die here but many millions will die there. What follows will make the Great Depression seem a mild recession. History will unfold in ways we cannot now fathom. The American experiment, still young, may falter. Other forces, not so easily congenial to freedom, may rise. The utopian world you seek will be set back a century at the least. We will all have to bear the brand of that fire, but on your foreheads the mark will be sharp and deep. And we will know you for what you are. Worse still, you will know.

Four years in and the only way out and out now would be to quit. Capitulation is not a policy but a procrastination. There is a way out, but it is years away and many people, people who swoon easily in the light sun of this war lite, do not have the ability to endure war; even so tepid a war as this. They do not have the simple patience.

Read the rest here.
 
It was hard to do but I watched the whole rally on CSPAN and the speakers at the event said very little about the war in Iraq for the most part.........They all seemed to have their own agenda and its a disgrace to have a foul mouthed bitch like Cindy Sheehan represent you and get a standing ovation.......

There was a huge countr protest supporting the troops but the left wing media gave it very little publicity or support......
 
Gathering of Eagles counter anti-war protest in Washington D.C. Saturday. The Group out numbered anti war protesters but the main stream media did not cover them. I guess it did not fit there spineless liberal agenda. Below I posted links that cover this. ~ Sgt Rock

washingtonpost.com

Locals counter protesters in D.C.
 
Gathering of Eagles counter anti-war protest in Washington D.C. Saturday. The Group out numbered anti war protesters but the main stream media did not cover them. I guess it did not fit there spineless liberal agenda. Below I posted links that cover this. ~ Sgt Rock

washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines

Locals counter protesters in D.C.

I heard the pro troops rally outnumbered the anti troop rally too......Funny the left wing media did not report that.......:roll:
 
What would you expect from a left wing media. When the going gets tough the Liberals tuck the tails between there legs and run.
 
Well,to their credit, while they do not care about thetroops, they do care about some people

On the board of directors of ANSWER is one Muna Coobtee who is also quite involved in the "free Palestine alliance" that advocates the complete destruction of Israel and is a very strong supporter of Hamas.

But, hey -- they claim to be for peace and anti-racism, and what could be any more peaceful and anti-racist than Hamas?

Maybe the Hezbollah?......

No wait!

how about Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades?:lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom