- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No more hetero's, no more hetero's!!!!!
I've always felt as though I was a lesbian trapped in a man's body:mrgreen:
No more hetero's, no more hetero's!!!!!
Maybe we should start protesting church wedding and see how quickly the religious folks cry foul... No one likes a taste of their own medicine.
Иосиф Сталин;1059684169 said:You don't understand because you grew up amidst that multicultural propaganda that gays are OK, minorities should be given preference all the time, and every citizen should own a gun.
And why should they be allowed to marry? Who says they can? Who says two men can marry each other? That is disgusting. In the future, anybody who doesn't approve of gay marriage or doesn't act gay is going to be persecuted.
Don't forget that. Only one mentality can prevail. It's either them or us. We cannot co-exist, because they want to destroy normal people. You have to become like them, if you are to progress in the future world. Well, not under my watch. I'm not becoming another gay. Quit dreaming about all those happy-end movies. This is not Hollywood. This is real life.
We can already witness this in colleges, where a certain degree of gayness makes you cool and appreciated, whereas if you don't tolerate that behavior you're immediately marginalized.
Yeah, I'm watching you, buddies. This is not MTV.
Иосиф Сталин;1059684329 said:Not when it's meant to help society. And this is meant to protect those who don't have yet a fully conscious capability to detect evil.
Star Wars and Star Trek can coexist. They do so quite nicely on both my DVD shelf and book shelf.
Trolls aren't welcome here.
Maybe we should start protesting church wedding and see how quickly the religious folks cry foul... No one likes a taste of their own medicine.
Actually, I think those opposed to SSM would love to see just this happen. If public opinion matters, this would be a really dumb thing to do. Just sayin'.
I'm not trying to be a troll, debating an issue with you is next to impossible though.
You ignore every piece of supporting evidence people have shown you on this thread.
You're not disagreeing with us, you're refusing to accept the facts that we've stated and backed up with documentation.
From this I can only concluded that you are not interested in an actual dialogue but in maintaining your dogmatic bigoted beliefs.
"...you are not interested in an actual dialogue but in maintaining your dogmatic bigoted beliefs." - SlackMaster
If you have something intelligent to say then do so but, once again, trolls are not welcome here.
So you have nothing intelligent to add, either?
Geeeez!
“If you're referring to me…” - Belgarath
I was referring to you.
“The only difference between a gay coupling and a straight coupling is that the gay people can't create children. The same is true of infertile straight couples. The state allows infertile straight couples to get married, ergo gay couples should be able to get married.” - Belgarath
Infertile heterosexual couples still consists of men and women and does not alter the fundamental nature of marriage.
Homosexual couples do alter the fundamental nature of marriage and should never be allowed.
Homosexual couples do alter the fundamental nature of marriage and should never be allowed.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
Not true. Marriages between men and women existed long before Christianity.
Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that the concept is
oxymoronic. Marriage, they say, must involve a man and a woman
because (1) that is the definitional essence of marriage, (2) the Judeo-
Christian tradition requires it, and/or (3) the modem Western nationstate
has structured society around the assumption that only differentsex
marital unions are allowed. Proponents of same-sex marriage dispute
and often ridicule these assertions. Thus far, neither side has
analyzed these arguments in the context of the history of marriage
itself. That is the project of this Article.