• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another example of woke gone mad

The perils of all things CRT have been hashed, rehashed so many times I simply don't care who at the moment wants to bring it up again. And of course, the mere term CRT is used generically by the right to encompass all manner of teachings having anything to do with race they don't like.

So spare us the CRT boogey man. If you read or hear about a school with a specific curriculum you don't agree with cite IT. And we can discuss IT. Don't just generically yell "CRT!!!" and expect everyone to to agree we should all be afraid for the kids. That's exactly what happened in the local school district I referenced and now the kids are in fact paying for the paranoia of the misguided right wingers who wanted to save the kids from a peril that did not exist.
You've got "right wingers" to chastise, so I'm not surprised that you don't care whether CRT principles are taught in public schools or not. I do, as I happen to believe public education is incredibly important and I don't want to see it further politicized.
 
Left-wing argument:

Show me evidence that proves you're right.

(Evidence provided)

I'm not interested in that.

(A modest time interval passes)

You've not provided any evidence that proves you're right ...
 
Cite, please.

7 in 10 Parents Say Children’s Post-Pandemic Social Skills Are at Risk, Per Osmo StudyData Shows 81% of Parents Want Schools to Implement Activities Teaching Their Kids Social Skills​


that's what backing up a claim looks like. not a link to a post where i posted about a post i had a link to a post in. i'm saying you do that. obviously
 

7 in 10 Parents Say Children’s Post-Pandemic Social Skills Are at Risk, Per Osmo StudyData Shows 81% of Parents Want Schools to Implement Activities Teaching Their Kids Social Skills​


that's what backing up a claim looks like. not a link to a post where i posted about a post i had a link to a post in. i'm saying you do that. obviously
You said "conservatives" were advocating this. Wouldn't "7 out of 10" mean support for this crosses political ideology?
 
So you only hate them because you've been trained to hate them?
I listed the ones I have watched and read. What more do you want? I gave you my list. They are the kind who receive Pulitzers for known lies.
 
You said "conservatives" were advocating this. Wouldn't "7 out of 10" mean support for this crosses political ideology?
I am LMAO here because I read his response and had not seen yours and was scratching my head thinking the same thing. But, hey. Left-wingers are well known for that sort of tactic and hope the readers don't catch their disingenuousness.
 
Left-wing argument:

Show me evidence that proves you're right.

(Evidence provided)

I'm not interested in that.

(A modest time interval passes)

You've not provided any evidence that proves you're right ...
What's worse is when they provide a link without an excerpt to make it seem as if they do have backup for their opinion or evidence. If you play Charlie Brown and read the link and then come back to them and say their link actually refutes what they are saying or does not confirm their post, you don't hear back from them, or even crazier they will just say that it does. Like Mayorkis and Harris saying the border is secure while they watch hordes of people just walk across the border.
 
Nah. I can easily defend everything I said, with hard evidence and irrefutable argument.


Like "This election was stolen!"

Yeah, you're right. Look how many people got suckered by that one.


It was on TV, man. Really. It was on TV.


Once, under his breath and to cover his ass. But he shouted, "The election was stolen! You have to fight!!!" about 20 times.


You're just parroting the talking points of rightwing media.
If you had evidence you would post it in a nanosecond.
How is saying the election was stolen a lie? Was Hillary Lying? Did Al Gore lie when he filed suit? Did Stacey Abrams lie? Did Kamala Harris lie when she said she only got 2% in the Democrat primary because of white people?
"Fight" is a figure of speech. You know this. That is unless you agree with the Democrats encouraging the riots.
You project who and what you are in your last comment.
 
Which outlets are NOT MSM?
Alternate sites and bloggers like OANN. Even Fox is veering to the left today. If Hannity, Tucker and Laura left them, they would join the ranks of CNN and MSNBS

PS. Yes, I know it is MSNBC but MSNBS fits them better
 
Uh... you think Trump is smart enough to write emails?

Seriously. He doesn't know how to do that, so far as I know. He doesn't even know what emails are. He told Hannity the other night that the FBI was probably searching MAL for Hillary's emails.

Seriously. He said that.
So, was it a lie when you said there were blueprints?
 
The panel said in a letter requesting cooperation from Georgia Republican congressman Barry Loudermilk that he gave a tour the day before the Capitol attack. The startling disclosure resurrects a contentious line of inquiry that connects House Republicans to the insurrection.

Shortly after the meeting concluded, Trump posted his now-infamous tweet urging his supporters to come to Washington. “Be there, will be wild!” he said. The panel showed how the tweet unleashed a clarion call to radical right-wing militia groups.

“It ‘will be wild’ means we need volunteers for the firing squad,” one user on a far-right forum posted, according to evidence presented by the panel. “Is the 6th D-Day? Is that why Trump wants everyone there?” another user wrote. “Trump just told us all to come armed. F—-g A, this is happening,” read a third message displayed on the screen.

Tuesday’s hearing came at a pivotal moment for the panel; it was the first since the abruptly scheduled session two weeks ago, in which Hutchinson provided the most damning testimony against the former President to date. She told the panel that the Secret Service told Trump that many of his supporters were heavily armed on Jan. 6, but he told them to go to the Capitol anyway,


you didn't watch but demand to know? familiar tactic

and the secret service communications vanished. but hey you'll say that means they're innocent
I mistakingly went to your link thinking you provided the salient excerpts when all you did is talk about some tour. This is not the way to debate, Mustachio.
You said there was a blueprint. Show it. Give me the evidence of a blueprint. Not some citizens being shown the interior of the Capitol building as a courtesy to show how congress works and an article that tries to connect that to some prearranged plan. This would be laughed out of any court in the world except for the stupid hearings where they are grasping at any straw.
 
You can stop the bullshit now. I've provided evidence. You've simply decided to close your mind about it.
CRT is not being taught in any American schools, so Trump supporters can stop the nonsensical false claims about that now.
 
CRT is not being taught in any American schools, so Trump supporters can stop the nonsensical false claims about that now.
They won't. Their political and media controllers feed them this culture war stuff and eat it right up.
 
I listed the ones I have watched and read. What more do you want? I gave you my list. They are the kind who receive Pulitzers for known lies.
The media you posted are all rightwing, but they are actually news sources rather than so many rightwing propaganda preaching sources like Fox, Breitbart, etc., etc., etc.
 
"Woke" is nothing more than part of their shallow culture wars. It's what they do in the absence of real policy because it requires no real thought...
It's a twisted use of the word, and used as a "diversionary slang", that indicates that, "truth is not something" those who convolute the word, use it as a "trigger" to provide drama incitements to promote anguish within the under-educated and mis-educated mass of Right Wingers, who still lust for white nationalism and obsessed to want to hide the long history of their created tragedies and their acts of inhumanity toward other human beings, whether they are black, brown, poor whites, and others.

These passages have told of such types, long before present day life.

Isaiah 5:20

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

John 8:44

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
 
What's worse is when they provide a link without an excerpt to make it seem as if they do have backup for their opinion or evidence. If you play Charlie Brown and read the link and then come back to them and say their link actually refutes what they are saying or does not confirm their post, you don't hear back from them, or even crazier they will just say that it does.
Preach it, Brother. Yes, rightwinger are downright famous for that sort of behavior. All we can do is hold their feet to the fire. Try to, I mean.
 
What does CRT have to do with a teacher going out of their way, and over the top, to make a point about the transgender debate?
 
The media you posted are all rightwing, but they are actually news sources rather than so many rightwing propaganda preaching sources like Fox, Breitbart, etc., etc., etc.
MSNBC and CNN are right-wing? OMG!

PS. Is this Brian Stelter?
 
It's a twisted use of the word, and used as a "diversionary slang", that indicates that, "truth is not something" those who convolute the word, use it as a "trigger" to provide drama incitements to promote anguish within the under-educated and mis-educated mass of Right Wingers, who still lust for white nationalism and obsessed to want to hide the long history of their created tragedies and their acts of inhumanity toward other human beings, whether they are black, brown, poor whites, and others.

These passages have told of such types, long before present day life.

Isaiah 5:20

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

John 8:44

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
I like that a poster proves my previous postings that current leftism uses the same tactics as do Christians, which is that they are "Holier than thou" and they (wokeys) are more compassionate, loving, knowledgeable and ,,,,fill in the blanks than the nonbelievers. Your post typifies what the left wokeys are.
 
Back
Top Bottom