- Feb 28, 2011
- Reaction score
- So. California
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
I don't listen to or read them all. But at the top of the list is MSNBS, then CNN, then NPR, USA Today, Yahoo, and others I can't think of at this moment. Printed rags are The NY Times, WaPo, and the LA Times.So, wise one, tell me, WHICH news outlets are what you term MSM? Please, no deflections, no ducking the question. Are MSM ALL MEDIA? In which case it would include Fox and Breitbart, right? Is the MSM anything to the left or center of Far Right media? Does BBC, Reuters, NPR, CBC, National Geographic or Christian Science Monitor or the like constitute the MSM.
My guess - but I am sure you are going to prove me wrong - is that you heard Trump once utter that term and you have since gotten attached to it without ANY concept of what you are even talking about?
So, again, without deflection or ducking the question - WHAT IS THE MSM? Which outlets would you consider part of the MSM?
Oh, shoo.I'm not sure I can be clear enough on this:
When the claim is "that's just as bad as being a swastika faced nazi", the claim is coming from a nazi. No one else thinks giant fake tits makes being a nazi okay. Only a nazi believes that.
Anytime someone claims, "that's like being a swastika faced nazi" you know they are. No one except a nazi thinks it's okay to do that. They do it for self preservation. Fundamentally, it's Holocaust denial.
Let's not accept Holocaust denying OPs. Big fake tits does not equal nazi. Claiming it does is, in fact, Holocaust denial.
Please elaborate. Claims are easy.>>>>>Now look where we are.<<<<<
Are you saying that....awwwww NEVER MIND.
You should be ashamed Paradox, excusing blatant antiAmerican activities from a traitorous bag of crap like Crooked donnietrump.
I expected better of you.
Who had the blueprints and where are the emails from Trump ordering anything about insurrection or entry?who gave the 1-6 insurrectionists blueprints to the capital and why did trump try to have pence killed? seems like trump sure did pkan it, beginning with his tweet asking everybody to be present on 1/6 while he planned to reject the election results and declare himself dictator
you should read about that one of these years
So they did punish the teacher? Being not tolerant of it, I'm assuming they did.No, what you misunderstand is the supposed tolerance of the issue. As I explained in my post #78. Neither the board not the school is tolerant of this behaviour. They are working with Province to establish a "dress code" for teachers that would allow for disciplinary action for this type of unacceptable dressing. Evidently the teacher is an excellent teacher and well liked by many of the kids. I still can't figure out if this was a 8ne off or a daily thing.
Nah. I can easily defend everything I said, with hard evidence and irrefutable argument.You are just parroti9ng the talking points of MSM.
Like "This election was stolen!"It is well known that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it as true.
It was on TV, man. Really. It was on TV.Trump had nothing to do with 1-6.
Once, under his breath and to cover his ass. But he shouted, "The election was stolen! You have to fight!!!" about 20 times.He told them to demonstrate peacefully.
You're just parroting the talking points of rightwing media.He never ordered them to enter the Capitol building and his discussion about a new slate of electors was not illegal.
Uh... you think Trump is smart enough to write emails?Who had the blueprints and where are the emails from Trump ordering anything about insurrection or entry?
When Trumpers are as dumb as Trump is it is hard to convince them Trump is dumbUh... you think Trump is smart enough to write emails?
Seriously. He doesn't know how to do that, so far as I know. He doesn't even know what emails are. He told Hannity the other night that the FBI was probably searching MAL for Hillary's emails.
Seriously. He said that.
Who had the blueprints and where are the emails from Trump ordering anything about insurrection or entry?
You'd be amazed at how many libs think this is absurd. If anything, it's a generational thing. Listen to me when I say you should not speak for a whole group of people.When I see more people on the left speaking out against the parading of adult sexuality in front of children -- and fewer of them defending (implicitly or explicitly) -- then I'll stop generalizing, but not before.
The perils of all things CRT have been hashed, rehashed so many times I simply don't care who at the moment wants to bring it up again. And of course, the mere term CRT is used generically by the right to encompass all manner of teachings having anything to do with race they don't like.And if this is the best you have I’m sure you don’t really have a solid counterargument.
The post send to you in this thread, that you replied to and claimed you were "not interested" in it.The Rufo thread? What's that?
By saying you were not that familiar with it. That's not addressing it. That's a soft way of ignoring it.And I certainly addressed the 1619 Project.
Why so shy about acknowledging what I have provided?Why so shy about proving your claim that CRT is being taught in our schools? It should be easy to point out some examples.
How do you think that comparison proves that CRT principles are not being taught in public schools today?actually, it is you who has no rebuttal to the comparison of CRT in the 2020s to the red scare of the 1950s
that was a very apt comparison
one you apparently recognize you cannot overturn and instead try to sidestep with a diversion away from that remark