• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another example of the radical left being two faced

Logical1

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
7,394
Reaction score
2,307
Location
Nebraska
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

No one said Harris was beyond criticism, quit distorting the truth... while making other threads on "morals."
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

Who said you are not allowed to criticize Harris? Not saying you made that up, but...OK, I am saying that. You made that up. It is total and complete bull****. At least try and come up with something at least semi-plausible. Your Russian handlers are really making you look bad...
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

Literally nobody has said you can't criticize Harris. Nobody. You should be criticizing her on the substance of her policies and not her gender and skin color. How many times have Republicans already tried to call her a foreign born whore?
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

All TrumpQins have been doing is trashing VP candidate and Sen. Harris. She’s Nasty, BIRTHERISM, Lies on Law and Order
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

It's really pretty simple. Palin is white, Christian and Republican It's pretty much required that people criticize her for all that stuff. Harris, on the other hand, is black, affiliated with religion to whatever extent polls best at the time and is a Democrat. She is, by definition, a perfected human being and any criticism of her is racist, sexist and criminal hate speech. See, there is no double standard because the two are completely different!
 
All on the radical left including the MSM say we are not allowed to criticize Harris. I remember these same people trying to totally destroy Sara Palin.

Anyone want to try to convince me that isnt being two faced?

First, it is up to you to convince us that what you say is true. Do you have anything to substantiate your posit?
 
No one on the entire planet over the course of recorded history has ever said that we are not allowed to criticize Harris.

If creating that strawman is the only way that you feel safe enough communicating your ideas, then maybe you should consider playing Tic Tac Toe against yourself until the end of your days. You will never walk away a loser.
 
It's really pretty simple. Palin is white, Christian and Republican It's pretty much required that people criticize her for all that stuff. Harris, on the other hand, is black, affiliated with religion to whatever extent polls best at the time and is a Democrat. She is, by definition, a perfected human being and any criticism of her is racist, sexist and criminal hate speech. See, there is no double standard because the two are completely different!

How long have you been experiencing persecutory delusions as you described in your post? I'm a radical progressive socialist amoral atheist lefty and I didnt get any super-secret pizza shop Emails on my Act-Blue decoder ring from Hillary, Goerge Soros, Obama, Rachel Maddow or Alinsky that we weren't permitted to criticize Kamela Harris. I'm not really a fan of hers but because the alternative is Trump I will happily vote for her and then protest her saner polices after she is the Veep. :2wave:

Persecutory delusions occur when someone believes others are out to harm them despite evidence to the contrary. It’s a type of paranoid thinking that can be part of several different mental illnesses.

Whether people with this condition think co-workers are sabotaging their work or they believe the government is trying to kill them, persecutory delusions vary in severity. Some individuals with persecutory delusions believe they have to go to great lengths to stay safe—and consequently, they may struggle to function normally.

While everyone may experience some false beliefs about people being "out to get them" at times, for people with persecutory delusions, their beliefs take a serious toll on their lives. Their delusions are usually a symptom of a mental illness that requires professional help.
Occurrence of Persecutory Delusions

Individuals with mental illness may experience persecutory delusions. These delusions are most commonly associated with schizophrenia, but they also may appear in manic episodes of bipolar disorder or with severe depression with psychosis.

They may also signal a delusional disorder—an illness that is characterized by at least one month of delusions but no other psychotic symptoms. It's also common for individuals with dementia to develop delusions. It's estimated that 27% of individuals with dementia experience persecutory delusions at one time or another.

Delusional disorders are far less common than other mental illnesses that may involve psychosis. It’s estimated that only 0.2% of the population experiences delusional disorder.1
What Are Persecutory Delusions?
 
How long have you been experiencing persecutory delusions as you described in your post? I'm a radical progressive socialist amoral atheist lefty and I didnt get any super-secret pizza shop Emails on my Act-Blue decoder ring from Hillary, Goerge Soros, Obama, Rachel Maddow or Alinsky that we weren't permitted to criticize Kamela Harris. I'm not really a fan of hers but because the alternative is Trump I will happily vote for her and then protest her saner polices after she is the Veep. :2wave:

What Are Persecutory Delusions?

Well son of a gun! Those "persecutory delusions" sounds like a dead ringer for Trump Derangement Syndrome!
 
Who said you are not allowed to criticize Harris? Not saying you made that up, but...OK, I am saying that. You made that up. It is total and complete bull****. At least try and come up with something at least semi-plausible. Your Russian handlers are really making you look bad...

I found out where it came from. It was a Tucker Carlson talking point.

'No right to criticize her': Tucker Carlson says Harris's 'historic' identity will make her immune to scrutiny

"For the next several months, Harris is going to say that Donald Trump is a racist," Carlson said. "She will say that every day until November. That’s her job now. You watch. But keep in mind as you watch, that there’s no fighting back. It’s not allowed. Kamala Harris is a 'historic' candidate, and that means you have no right to criticize her regardless of what she says."​
 
Well son of a gun! Those "persecutory delusions" sounds like a dead ringer for Trump Derangement Syndrome!

Are they still Trump delusions if I can prove his statements or actions with supporting links to news sources such as NPR, BBC, AP, UPI, and Reuters?
 
Are they still Trump delusions if I can prove his statements or actions with supporting links to news sources such as NPR, BBC, AP, UPI, and Reuters?

Maybe. Are you going to post links to opinion pieces, well rounded discussions of given actions or the raw data to support your claims? I like raw data and source documents because I can do my own interpretation of what's going on. I also like well rounded, fair discussions of the facts and circumstances because sometimes I'm able to pick up and angle I totally missed. I'm not so big on opinion pieces but they do serve their purpose in getting someone else's thinking on a given subject. Unfortunately these opinion pieces are about 90% of what's on the internet and about 90% of that 90% is crap that's been regurgitated ad nauseam in an effort to get people to believe that the opinion is actually a fact.
 
Maybe. Are you going to post links to opinion pieces, well-rounded discussions of given actions or the raw data to support your claims? I like raw data and source documents because I can do my own interpretation of what's going on. I also like well rounded, fair discussions of the facts and circumstances because sometimes I'm able to pick up and angle I totally missed. I'm not so big on opinion pieces but they do serve their purpose in getting someone else's thinking on a given subject. Unfortunately, these opinion pieces are about 90% of what's on the internet and about 90% of that 90% is crap that's been regurgitated ad nauseam in an effort to get people to believe that the opinion is actually a fact.

What opinion piece did I post that you are referring to?
 
What opinion piece did I post that you are referring to?

You asked me if you could prove certain things by posting links to certain websites. I told you what I would find valid as far as "proof" goes.
 
You asked me if you could prove certain things by posting links to certain websites. I told you what I would find valid as far as "proof" goes.

I've reviewed my posts in this thread 3 times and I cannot find that statement in them. Are you sure that you are replying to the correct person or reading what I said accurately?
 
I've reviewed my posts in this thread 3 times and I cannot find that statement in them. Are you sure that you are replying to the correct person or reading what I said accurately?

Look, I know that I'm a white Republican and therefore dumb as a stump so I guess I just read #12 incorrectly. I figured that you were asking me a question so I responded to it with that in mind. Apparently there was no question and you were merely correcting me, as is necessary with some of us dumb ass Trump supporters. I sincerely apologize for getting that wrong and promise to try better in the future.
 
Back
Top Bottom