Another coward writes a book about Trump

[code1211]

can't speak for soap box but i have seen nothing which tells me the allegations concerning hunter's laptop are valid

so, enlighten me/us; what proof of legitimacy of the incriminating information exists?
for extra credit, what exactly is found to be incriminating?

The legitimacy of the lap top is ONLY whether or not it belonged to Hunter Biden when it was dropped off at the Computer repair shop at the time when he signed the receipt for it.

If it was dropped off by Hunter when he signed the receipt, then it's legit.

No real mystery here. The pictures and communications on the Lap Top show that Hunter is whore mongering, stripper chasing, dead beat baby daddy, addicted to coke and lacking in much or any self control.

Why it was hidden by the legacy media, even a mention of it suppressed by the social media platforms and why those asking questions were systematically attacked by the legacy media are the real questions.

Why they were attacked by the Democrat party and it's operatives is not questionable in any way. Biased and dishonest proponents act this way. Why did the legacy media act this way?

If it was nothing, then why was it so actively buried.

If it was nothing then, how did it become something now? No facts changed. Why did the story change?

New York Times quietly deletes claim Hunter Biden laptop story was 'unsubstantiated'

The New York Times quietly deleted its assertion that an October article from the New York Post about the business dealings of Joe Biden’s son Hunter was “unsubstantiated.” In the reworked report, the outlet reported on a Federal Election Commission decision that dismissed a Republican complaint...

news.yahoo.com

 

[justabubba]

The legitimacy of the lap top is ONLY whether or not it belonged to Hunter Biden when it was dropped off at the Computer repair shop at the time when he signed the receipt for it.

If it was dropped off by Hunter when he signed the receipt, then it's legit.

No real mystery here. The pictures and communications on the Lap Top show that Hunter is whore mongering, stripper chasing, dead beat baby daddy, addicted to coke and lacking in much or any self control.

Why it was hidden by the legacy media, even a mention of it suppressed by the social media platforms and why those asking questions were systematically attacked by the legacy media are the real questions.

Why they were attacked by the Democrat party and it's operatives is not questionable in any way. Biased and dishonest proponents act this way. Why did the legacy media act this way?

If it was nothing, then why was it so actively buried.

If it was nothing then, how did it become something now? No facts changed. Why did the story change?

New York Times quietly deletes claim Hunter Biden laptop story was 'unsubstantiated'

The New York Times quietly deleted its assertion that an October article from the New York Post about the business dealings of Joe Biden’s son Hunter was “unsubstantiated.” In the reworked report, the outlet reported on a Federal Election Commission decision that dismissed a Republican complaint...

news.yahoo.com

april 1 has passed

we should trust the contents of a laptop that has had rudy julieannie as an individual in its chain of custody

no way that moron would try to plant incriminating material on hunter biden's laptop

 

[code1211]

april 1 has passed

we should trust the contents of a laptop that has had rudy julieannie as an individual in its chain of custody

no way that moron would try to plant incriminating material on hunter biden's laptop
View attachment 67386310

All of the legacy media and all of the social media "platforms" aggressively covered and, in most cases, exaggerated the lies regarding the unsubstantiated and now proven falsehoods regarding Russian Collusion.

All of the legacy media and all of the social media "platforms" aggressively suppressed and ignored and then attacked and condemned all tried to cover the Accurate and true Hunter Biden Lap Top.

Care to comment on the propagandists who participated in both of these conspiratorial campaigns of deception intended to deceive the weak minded?

 

[iguanaman]

And yet pence did not follow the directions you assert were mandated and Pence was not fired as a result.

Go figure.

The insurrectionists were trying to hang Pence as a result of Trumps orders. That is worse than firing him.

 

[code1211]

The insurrectionists were trying to hang Pence as a result of Trumps orders. That is worse than firing him.

Were they? Really?

How far out of the realm of reality do you need to go to hold the opinions you post here?