lizzie
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2009
- Messages
- 28,580
- Reaction score
- 31,554
- Location
- between two worlds
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
A little over 20 years later, Krauthammer's predictions have proven almost embarrassingly inaccurate. Last week, the findings of a 24-year-long study of crack babies revealed that parental use of the drug had little or no direct effect on the children. In the process of investigating the babies, however, researchers discovered another environmental problem that did, in fact, lead to problems with depression, anxiety, cognitive functioning, and a host of other issues: poverty.
Umm, it's hard for me to believe that people can't see the correlation between poverty and drug use, and that it's not just the poverty, but the entire culture which is in play here. We don't tend to see crack cocaine use in middle and upper income settings, so it's probably a chicken-and-egg situation. Does the poverty cause drug use, or does drug use cause poverty, or is there a cultural relationship? I'd say probably the latter.
Prenatal cocaine exposure not severely damaging to growth, learning, study suggestsThe areas where children showed significant negative impact from cocaine -- sustained attention and in self-regulating behavior -- could lead to serious problems for children in adolescence or adulthood. "They might have difficulty with impulse control and they might be risk-takers," says Dr. Black. "They might be more likely to be involved with drugs themselves." Innovative techniques, including neuroimaging, have suggested that cocaine exposure impacts specific brain structures and functions. The cocaine-exposed children seem to have differences in both white and gray matter, for example.
I'd say that the effects of crack on babies is significant enough to be of concern.