Anonymous, trump, Putin, pedophilia

Content speaks for itself, pretty much.

It kind of brings up that obvious question: who is Anonymous? I mean seriously, from the beginning it was pretty absurd that a logo that anybody could put on a video, plus a bad speech synthesizer, was supposed to be a "source". Sure, it's a source if it gives somebody's Bitcoin password or provides an explanation so compelling that it is worth quoting and then anyone who reads it would believe it based on the logic of it. But I'm not picking through some long video from a non-source citing unnamed sources of its own, thinking it's some avenue of enlightenment. Someone could write the unknown truth anywhere - could be there - but it could be told first on this forum too, you know.

bythoughts said:

It kind of brings up that obvious question: who is Anonymous? I mean seriously, from the beginning it was pretty absurd that a logo that anybody could put on a video, plus a bad speech synthesizer, was supposed to be a "source".

Click to expand...

No one is saying 'trust it at face value'. Apply skepticism and decide for yourself.

bythoughts said:

But I'm not picking through some long video from a non-source citing unnamed sources of its own

Click to expand...

But if instead of applying skepticism and deciding for yourself, you don't watch it, you can't say much. It's not like it's a source with bad history or background deserving to be dismissed at face value, they have a good history.

Video straight facts.

We need a real lefty in the Whitehouse after this damage Trump has inflicted.