Ann Coulter said what?

[Simon W. Moon]

I can't imagine how clueless someone would have to be to be a Trump supporter at this point.

That's the thing.

You don't have to be an uninformed moron to back a bad horse.

It'd be easier if everybody who backed Trump were an obvious moron.

But humans make decisions about things like politics in ways that appear irrational to outside observers.
However, closer inspection reveals that there are individual, idiosyncratic contexts in which the humans' apparently irrational decision making is rational.

rational irrationality


You can be an uninformed moron and back Trump though.
The two groups are not mutually exclusive or anything.

 

[SoCal]

That's the thing.

You don't have to be an uninformed moron to back a bad horse.

It'd be easier if everybody who backed Trump were an obvious moron.

But humans make decisions about things like politics in ways that appear irrational to outside observers.
However, closer inspection reveals that there are individual, idiosyncratic contexts in which the humans' apparently irrational decision making is rational.

rational irrationality


You can be an uninformed moron and back Trump though.
The two groups are not mutually exclusive or anything.

That's a good point. Some are moronic enough to believe his daily lies, yet others know he's a clown who threatens our security, but don't care as long as they get the judges they prefer.

I'll take the morons eveytime...

 

[D_NATURED]

Post #54

Post 54 was just your excuse for Coulter's idiocy. Like Farrakhan, Coulter makes her living being hateful. Both are conservatives no matter who they claim to support. Religious whackadoodle like Farrakhan only prove that bigotry is not a disorder that only white people contract.

Instead of insisting that imperfect leaders make imperfect social movements, why don't you explain how a march for women, in an environment where sexual assault is excused by Republican leaders, is not worth having.