jimmyjack
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2005
- Messages
- 1,166
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- U.K England
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
jimmyjack said:Unborn Bird’s protected by law.
Unborn humans are not protected by law.
Our priorities are wrong.
Do you deny it?jallman said:Just where are you drawing this conclusion from?
jimmyjack said:Do you deny it?
ngdawg said::roll: Humans aren't going extinct.....
Could someone PLEASE authorize a simple intelligence test as a prerequisite to posting??? I'm beginning to think Freedom of Speech needs some revising.....
jallman said:Are you going to show us what gave you this idea...or are you trying to bait me into saying something you think I will regret. Your attempt is very transparent.
jimmyjack said:Neither are birds.
ngdawg said:Several species are...
/me puts the kidgloves on...jimmyjack said:Yes, and some are not, but it doesn’t change the facts stated in the beginning.
vergiss said:A source might be good. Something that has relevance to what you're saying. They can't all be protected, or I wouldn't have bought eggs from the supermarket this morning. :lol:
vergiss said:A source might be good. Something that has relevance to what you're saying. They can't all be protected, or I wouldn't have bought eggs from the supermarket this morning. :lol:
jallman said:Thats really all I was asking for too...he is trying to bait someone into making a comment that he can "rebutt". The only difference between jimmyjack and a ghost though is that a ghost is harder to see through.
jimmyjack said:I didn’t say they where all protected.
The statement is true, end of argument.
jimmyjack said:There is no need, the statement is true, accept it, or prove it wrong.
jallman said:no, continue your absurd point by showing a source to base it off of and then I will be happy to show you why you are making a serious topic like abortion an exercise in opinionated absurdity...then the argument really gets fun while I hand you your azz. :mrgreen:
jallman said:In other words: jimmyjack didnt really have a point, just an absurd assertion which he never intended to back up, but instead wasted bandwidth over a non issue. Good job...other pro-lifers must really look at you as an asset to their team. :rofl
jimmyjack said:I didn’t say they where all protected.
The statement is true, end of argument.
jimmyjack said:In other words you don’t deny the statement and you accept the government is unethical for putting birds before humans.
jimmyjack said:No, I made a statement, you want to challenge it? -then go for it.
Are you denying the statement is true?
vergiss said:WTF?
Abortion is a right in a civilised country. The statement is true, end of argument. :lol:
jimmyjack said:What is so civilised about killing our own species for convenience?
jallman said:You made the assertion, so you are responsible for proving it in some way or another. But okay, lets play, I can still win by your rules. No one in his or her right mind believes that animals are more protected than humans. Now post something to disprove my rebuttal or call it quits, pal. :mrgreen:
jimmyjack said:Unborn Bird’s protected by law.
Unborn humans are not protected by law.
FACT!
DO YOU DENY THIS?
vergiss said:Yes. I had a fried egg on toast less than 30 minutes ago. :mrgreen:
(Now maybe we'll get a bloody source or two.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?