• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Andrew Sullivan, iconoclastic conservative, writes on Trump

maxparrish

Conservatarian
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
17,803
Reaction score
14,650
Location
SF Bay Area
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
One of the problems in citing the most recent thoughts from Sullivan is that it applies to the multitude of threads regarding the mad King's actions, so, I gave up trying. On its own, regarding ALL of Trump's mad pursuits it, applies.

He writes in substack:

... But a sentence in a recent Mark Helprin piece jogged my amygdala nonetheless. He described the president as someone who “behaves like a wild boar crashing through a field of well-tended crops. (Look carefully at the eyes, and you see it.)”

Yes, you do. Helprin is as far from being a leftist as one might imagine — which, of course, is precisely why he sees the feral glint in Trump’s eyes the way he does. Conservatism is prudent, diligent care for the inheritance of the past, and the shepherding of constitutional democratic governance away from the shoals of dysfunction and ideology. In that sense, Trump is conservatism’s actual nemesis: a wild boar — psychologically incapable of understanding anything but dominance and revenge, with no knowledge of history, crashing obliviously and malevolently through the ruined landscape of our constitutional democracy.

This very Greek tragedy — conservatives killing the Constitution they love because they hate the left more — is made more poignant by Trump’s utter cluelessness: he doesn’t even intend to end the American experiment in self-government and individual freedom. He isn’t that sophisticated. He is ending it simply because he knows no other way of being a human being. He cannot tolerate any system where he does not have total control. Character counts, as conservatives once insisted, and a man with Trump’s psyche, when combined with his demagogic genius, is quite simply incompatible with liberal democratic society. Unfit.
....
The tyrant’s first textbook tactic, of course, is declaring an emergency to justify the seizure of arbitrary power. Trump has now done so over 30 times in various executive orders and directives in his first seven months. Previous presidents have moved the dial of executive power, as a polarized, deadlocked Congress has surrendered more and more authority, but even John “Signing Statements” Yoo — who once argued that a US president has the right to crush the testicles of a child if he so wishes — now acknowledges that Trump has “elevated it to another level” (see AP graphic below): ,,,

Unfortunately, it is behind "the Weekly Dish" pay wall.

 
This:
This very Greek tragedy — conservatives killing the Constitution they love because they hate the left more — is made more poignant by Trump’s utter cluelessness: he doesn’t even intend to end the American experiment in self-government and individual freedom. He isn’t that sophisticated. He is ending it simply because he knows no other way of being a human being. He cannot tolerate any system where he does not have total control. Character counts, as conservatives once insisted, and a man with Trump’s psyche, when combined with his demagogic genius, is quite simply incompatible with liberal democratic society. Unfit.
The tyrant’s first textbook tactic, of course, is declaring an emergency to justify the seizure of arbitrary power. Trump has now done so over 30 times in various executive orders and directives in his first seven months. link
The part about his not being sophisticated, his black and white approach, the grab for total control...that is what appeals to MAGA. To quote Loki, they "were made to be ruled." They personally relate to the lack of sophistication, they need the black and white to feel secure, they accept that total control because then they cant be held responsible for when bad things happen in their lives...they were just obeying.
 
Last edited:
"onservatism is prudent, diligent care for the inheritance of the past, and the shepherding of constitutional democratic governance away from the shoals of dysfunction and ideology."

Because of course conservative ideology is not ideology.



Conservatism generally is about freezing time in the past, often an imaginary one. Fiscal conservatism is generally about saying "**** the general welfare, I wanna tax cut". I suppose my brand is wanting us to raise taxes back up sufficiently so we aren't borrowing like this, and yes that would mean the increases would be largely on the upper crust. They're the ones the conservatives always help.
 
The thing I have noted is, the more depraved the actions of the current regime, the more tolerant his acolytes become of the most egregious behaviors, from Alligator Alcatraz to the Crypto Con, vindictive prosecution, torture, pedophilia, and "disappearing" of immigrants (legal or not) are now routine and acceptable to them. It's conditioning. That kind of conditioning leads to extermination camps.
 
I like to say that conservatives take a snapshot of a moment in time, call it the perfect moment and try to get the laws just right so they can live in that moment forever.
Usually the moment was when their fathers were children.
 
Trumpism 101
 
You really should stop listening to talking potato heads.
 
I think Trumpism 101 is even simpler: Think of the worst thing you can imagine...

Then do it.
One thing I can't imagine is Trump and all his loyal law breakers not getting their comeuppance when a democrat re-takes the WH. It has to happen this time.
 

Agreed.

As Sullivan pointed out in his essay: in 2016 Sullivan said that the US was "ripe for tyranny", "But the one thing we didn’t really know before now is that in the face-off between this man’s will-to-power and liberal democracy, liberal democracy would just … fold."

Trump has, indeed "elevated it to another level":






And unlike, say, Putin, who capitalized on (and may well have orchestrated) an actual emergency — a terror attack — to make his first big move, Trump just declares non-existent ones real on Twitter — and presto! — they are real. He knows he doesn’t even have to bother to justify them. He rightly assumes that Americans have less resistance to bald-faced autocratic lies in 2025 than Russians did in 1999.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…