- Joined
- Jun 18, 2013
- Messages
- 46,086
- Reaction score
- 14,534
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Sorry but nope.Last time I'll explain this to you. I will allow you the last word should you respond.
Source control is preventing the infected from infecting the healthy. The CDC said that the best masks n95 when sealed properly only prevent 20 to 30 percent of infectious material from leaving the mask. The 70 to 80 percent allowed out of that source is well beyond what is necessary to infect. Hardly controlling that source. Which is why several actually comparison examples I have reviewed showed almost zero difference. Florida had schools with masks mandates and schools without them. Both had almost identical results. So if, as you keep suggesting, masks worked as a source control there should be a major difference in rates of infection. At least 20 to 30 percent given CDC numbers. There simply was almost no difference.
There are other examples that furthur prove the obvious.
Common sense says that if the source being controlled is able to release 70 to 80 percent of infectious material WITH EACH BREATH........IT ISNT BEING CONTROLLED. Especially since each breath releases virus well over that necessary to infect.
Even the news is beginning to chill on masks.
A multitude of scientific studies shows you are completely wrong.
I get that you cannot understand why your hypothesis is dead wrong.
It's been explained to you..but you cannot understand the science.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Overview
COVID-19 is a new type of coronavirus that causes mild to severe cases. Here’s a quick guide on how to spot symptoms, risk factors, prevent spread of the disease, and find out what to do if you think you have it.
www.webmd.com