So, tell me, how many impeachment hearings has pencil-neck Schiff held and how many times where WH lawyers invited?
That would have played right into trumps hands. He just wants to tie this up in court for decades, just as he does everything else.
Legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia
I say hurry up and send it to the Senate. Then it's our turn.
That would be Bill Clinton. They let him off in spite of overwhelming evidence.
You're in the Senate?
A long time ago I used to respect your posting but for some time now all you post is nonsense gobbelty goop. Now you are probably going to reply back to me that gobbelty is not actually actually a word or that I misspelled it. Your obsession with anything anti-Trump has taken away all of your objectivity. I know you are smarter than you appear in your posting. By the way, I like your Christmas tree avatar. Oops, I mean your "holiday" avatar. I want to be inclusive and not offend anyone by calling it a Christmas avatar.
Then who is the "we"? You always claim not to be a Republican.
That's a Christmas tree in my avatar. But if it makes you happy calling it a "holiday" tree, I don't think anyone would care.
I'm not obsessed with Trump anymore than you're obsessed with him. We are both posting on a board called "Debate Politics". The President is a politician. Did you forget what we post about here? It isn't called "Debate American Idol". And this thread is about the impeachment of Trump. Posting in this thread means someone is "obsessed with Trump" to you? Then maybe you are simply projecting your obsession on me. I'm not obsessed with him. I'm posting on topic.
I don't think this is the right board for you.
The post of mine you replied to had absolutely nothing to do with political debate. And I don't know what "we" refers to. There wasn't one word in my post that was "we" and yet you're asking me who was "we". That's what I mean by your posting being incoherent gobbledy gook. So, I don't think this is the right board for you. I don't hide who I am on here. My username is Moderate Right and I list my lean as slightly conservative. None of that means I am a left wing TDS'r. I have and do vote for a mix of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents but it doesn't mean that I don't lean right.
You said "our turn" and you don't know who you were referring to?
So you agree that you're a full Republican. It does explain why you are a citizen of Trump Fan Nation and would rather support a pedophile than a Democrat.
I'm on the right board. I'm not the one wondering why someone is posting about the President on a board called "Debate Politics". That is you.
More gobbledy gook. If you don't want to have serious discussions then just say so.
When you get some evidence, let me know. After three years we are still waiting for the first piece that would stand up in court.Then the Right will feel good when they let Trump off in spite of overwhelming evidence.
When you get some evidence, let me know. After three years we are still waiting for the first piece that would stand up in court.
I must correct myself. We do have some hard evidence--the transcript.I don't have evidence. I watched the hearings and saw the evidence everyone else presented. I didn't know they started the impeachment hearings 3 years ago. I thought it was only 72 days ago. How time flies.
I must correct myself. We do have some hard evidence--the transcript.
Trump presented it before the secret hearings started. What they did in the hearings was present speculation and wishful thinking. We are waiting for the first evidence against him.
That's it. It is the memorandum for record prepared for the event. Since translation was involved, a word for word transcript is not possible. However, it is still the primary source.I didn't see the "transcript". Can you post a link to it? I saw the memo released by the WH which even contains the caveat that it isn't a word for word transcript. And that one of course did contain him asking Zelensky to investigate his chief political rival, as we know.
That's it. It is the memorandum for record prepared for the event. Since translation was involved, a word for word transcript is not possible. It is still the primary source.
You may "know" but the document does not actually say that, nor do secondary sources confirm it.
If a voice recording exists. It may not, due to diplomatic protocols. The MFR is the primary source and any Judge would recognize it as such.A word for word transcript is possible. They merely need to dig up that recording from the secret server they loaded it on and let 15 people listen to it and transcribe it for it to be a real transcript.
And yes, Trump mentioned Biden and the investigation. What US President asks another President to launch an investigation into a US citizen? One who is using the power of his office improperly.
If a voice recording exists. It may not, due to diplomatic protocols. The MFR is the primary source and any Judge would recognize it as such.
Biden is mentioned in terms of the corruption issues of the previous Ukrainian administration. Indeed, the bulk of the conversation is about Ukrainian corruption and concerns that it posed.
You say it was moved from the highest security server. Why would they do that?It exists. It was moved to a secure server.
You say it was moved from the highest security server. Why would they do that?
Any questions from barking loon Lesko, or just her lips moving on mute?!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?