- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 12,510
- Reaction score
- 12,605
- Location
- New York City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
The non-aggression principle merely says that the initiation of violence is ethically unjustified. It doesn't forbid you from giving a starving person food or from treating sick people.
So then the starving or sick person has to just roll over and die so that you can keep your precious property. Not surprising that you don't take the obvious position of empathizing with the person in trouble. No, I clearly was only talking about rules that govern you, because that's all that matters, right?