American RACISM for Dummies (1 Viewer)

[RealmOfThePureForms]

You pass me on the street and sneer in my
direction. You glare at me and leer at my
wife and daughter. You stand in my path
and block the aisles, daring me to protest.

It’s OK for you to call me names like
"Cracker", "Honky", “Whitey”, “Gringo”,
“Peckerwood”, "Goyem" and "White Boy”.
If I call you "******", “Spook”, "Kike",
"Spic", "Beaner", "Sand-******", "Chink"
or "Gook", that makes me a racist.

Your musicians, actors, and comedians
constantly rant against my people. White
entertainers don’t dare mention race lest
their careers be ruined. You demand
respect and offer none in return.

You want us to call you "African-American"
although you've never been to Africa. True
Africans envy you for having been born
in the world's greatest country. African
immigrants learn to speak better English
than you do.

You never stop complaining about
"slavery" while casting accusing looks at
me. I have never owned a slave, nor have
any of my living relatives. You have never
been a slave, nor have any of your living
relatives. If your slave ancestors could
see you today, they'd surely wonder what
the hell you're whining about.

You condemn White activists who speak
of separation, but you have no problem
with your own activists who call for
domination and/or destruction of my
entire race.

You complain that Whites commit violence
against you, but your own ghettos are the
most dangerous places to be. You demand
the right to move into our neighborhoods.
If one of us is attacked while visiting your
neighborhood, nobody notices. If you are
attacked in ours, the world is instructed to
hate, judge and condemn us.

You denounce us for saying "Merry
Christmas" in public while you make a
fortune selling us your Christmas
merchandise.

Your borders are heavily guarded against
illegal immigration, but if we speak of
protecting our own borders we are again
called racists. You come here illegally to
flee your corrupt, diseased, poverty-stricken
countries but refuse to adopt our language
and lifestyle.

You have the United Negro College Fund.
You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month.
You have the Black Caucus.
You have "Affirmative" Action.
You have Racial Quotas
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Cinco de Mayo
You have Yom Hashoah.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP.
You have Ramadan.
You have BET.

If there became such a thing as White
Entertainment Television it would be shut
down rapidly by the politically correct liberal media.

If we announced a White Pride Day we’d
be bashed worldwide for our arrogance.

If we created a White History Month, it
would be summarily denounced and
banned, just as our state flags and history
lessons are being censored and edited,
bit-by-bit, simply to avoid offending you.

If we maintained an organization for White
folks only, to "advance" our lives, we'd be
dismissed as the most incorrigible bigots.

If we had an Aryan Defense League, we’d
be cursed as Nazi scum.

What if our politicians formed a White
Caucus? How long would that last?

If we built a college fund that awarded
Scholarships only to White students, the
money would be confiscated and the
organizers would be publicly excoriated.

If we proposed legislation that required
business contracts to be offered first to
White entrepreneurs, we'd be soundly
ridiculed and punished for violating your
civil rights.

If we had a "Million Man March” for White
people, the world’s population would
angrily decry our insolence.

You rob, rape, carjack, beat and shoot us.
When a white policeman beats or shoots
a violent black or hispanic criminal you
call it a hate crime and demand justice.

Your exclusive special-interest groups
(Black Muslims, Black Panthers, Anti
Defamation League, NAACP, etc.) are all
perpetuated in the name of “pride and
safety” while ours are outlawed and
labeled as “hate groups”.

You consciously embrace racism and
preserve hatred while claiming to reject
them both. They have been your crutches
since birth, passed down to you from your
parents and grandparents. Without them
you are not special; therefore, you strive
to keep them alive and flourishing.

We don’t hate you for the color of your
skin or because you pray to a different
God. That is a myth of the confused
American liberal. Most of us would be
happy to live in a world where all human
beings are given equal opportunity to
succeed or fail according to their own
personal merits and flaws; however, we
will not ultimately submit to your desire
to dominate, rule and exterminate us.

I am White and unashamed. I am, in fact,
proud of my White heritage, the values
of my White Family and the outstanding
achievements of my Aryan Ancestors.

If that makes me a racist, then so be it.

But just this once, take a break from
slandering me long enough to look at
yourself in the above light. If you have
any moral conviction at all, you are
bound to see how much uglier is your
hypocrisy compared to my so called racism.

 

[cherokee]

White pride day? Sure why not.
Its your right and I would even go as far to protect it.

It’s your other 1/2 the world can do without.
The ½ that has to surround itself with hate, the other ½ that has to quote Hitler and worship the man like a God. It’s the anti black, anti Red and anti Jewish hate speeches the KKK and the Nazi party spit out day in and day out that you have to separate yourselves from.
When you preach hate or you allow members in your site to preach no one will hear your message. They will be too busy listen to the Nazi.

I don’t know what else to say.

Dude I just read your sig..and you wonder why people judge you...??..

 

[RealmOfThePureForms]

White pride day? Sure why not.
Its your right and I would even go as far to protect it.

It’s your other 1/2 the world can do without.
The ½ that has to surround itself with hate, the other ½ that has to quote Hitler and worship the man like a God. It’s the anti black, anti Red and anti Jewish hate speeches the KKK and the Nazi party spit out day in and day out that you have to separate yourselves from.
When you preach hate or you allow members in your site to preach no one will hear your message. They will be too busy listen to the Nazi.

I don’t know what else to say.

Dude I just read your sig..and you wonder why people judge you...??..

This is the kind of racism that goes ignored by the liberal media. Could you imagine a white person doing this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebmiZFSxyh4&search=racism

Other half? There is no other half. There is a small fringe movement of whites (just like there are blacks) are actually are racist. And this small fringe movement that goes out in nazi uniforms gets all the public media attention while the great majority of whites who do not agree with them and denounce their behavior are comlpetely ignored.

We do not hate other races, we do not believe we are superior, a race cannot be superior. There are intelligent and unintelligent people of all races.

99.9% of all white nationalists are non-violent. But the media is so bias toward WN's that they make everyone think that WN's are all animals.

We are no different than any of the other racial groups in this country, the hispanics, the blacks, who have organizations that exist just to further their own race. The only difference is, unlike them, the majority of us are non-violent and not racist. The majority of us agree that everyone deserves to live in this world and there is enough land for everyone.

We recongnize that this liberal brainwashing scheme of telling us that multi-culturalism is successful is a lie. That the racial tensions taking place in this country today are proof. That the demographic make up of the country today is proof. People are more comfortable amongst there own race, amongst people who share their own culture and language.

Do you find that every city in America is perfectly divided or even close at all in ethnic division to the way the country is ethnically made up? It's not even close? You don't see each city with 70% white people 13% black people 10% hispanic 5% asian people and 1% other races.

No instead you see an asian community, a china-town, you see hundreds of all black cities and hundreds of all hispanic, and all white cities. There are more cities with ethnicities of one race 90% or higher than multi-ethnic cities. People prefer to be with their own race, and the liberal media keeps implying this is racism! It is not racism. It is human nature. To be comfortable amongst one's own kind who share the same basic ideals about life.

We are not the ones advocating the extinction of the hispanics and blacks in America. It's the Hispanics who are doing that out in the open right now in the southwest. But does the liberal media report it? No, they IGNORE IT, just like they ignore us and focus on one the one nutjob in nazi garb who thinks he is part of hitlers superior race.

And my sig is correct. There is nothing in my sig which is not true. So you judge me for stating the obvious? Answer these questions honestly. If you do, then you will have essentially said exactly what my sig says.

Has mexico produced a viable country?
Has mexico produced a stable infrastructure?
Why are mexicans coming to America to wave mexican flags and say they are loyal to mexico?
Why are they not going back to mexico if they are so loyal to it?
Why are they not learning english or American culture?

Answer those questions honestly and you will see why they are like a swarm of locusts devouring the infrastructure of our industrialized nation. Our healthcare system, our welfare system, our school system. All devoured, all destroyed, all in economic ruin.

We want justice! We want law! We want equality!

 

[cherokee]

Other half? There is no other half. There is a small fringe movement of whites (just like there are blacks) are actually are racist. And this small fringe movement that goes out in nazi uniforms gets all the public media attention while the great majority of whites who do not agree with them and denounce their behavior are comlpetely ignored.

We do not hate other races, we do not believe we are superior, a race cannot be superior. There are intelligent and unintelligent people of all races.

99.9% of all white nationalists are non-violent. But the media is so bias toward WN's that they make everyone think that WN's are all animals.

We are no different than any of the other racial groups in this country, the hispanics, the blacks, who have organizations that exist just to further their own race. The only difference is, unlike them, the majority of us are non-violent and not racist. The majority of us agree that everyone deserves to live in this world and there is enough land for everyone.

We recongnize that this liberal brainwashing scheme of telling us that multi-culturalism is successful is a lie. That the racial tensions taking place in this country today are proof. That the demographic make up of the country today is proof. People are more comfortable amongst there own race, amongst people who share their own culture and language.

Do you find that every city in America is perfectly divided or even close at all in ethnic division to the way the country is ethnically made up? It's not even close? You don't see each city with 70% white people 13% black people 10% hispanic 5% asian people and 1% other races.

No instead you see an asian community, a china-town, you see hundreds of all black cities and hundreds of all hispanic, and all white cities. There are more cities with ethnicities of one race 90% or higher than multi-ethnic cities. People prefer to be with their own race, and the liberal media keeps implying this is racism! It is not racism. It is human nature. To be comfortable amongst one's own kind who share the same basic ideals about life.

We are not the ones advocating the extinction of the hispanics and blacks in America. It's the Hispanics who are doing that out in the open right now in the southwest. But does the liberal media report it? No, they IGNORE IT, just like they ignore us and focus on one the one nutjob in nazi garb who thinks he is part of hitlers superior race.

And my sig is correct. There is nothing in my sig which is not true. So you judge me for stating the obvious? Answer these questions honestly. If you do, then you will have essentially said exactly what my sig says.

Has mexico produced a viable country?
Has mexico produced a stable infrastructure?
Why are mexicans coming to America to wave mexican flags and say they are loyal to mexico?
Why are they not going back to mexico if they are so loyal to it?
Why are they not learning english or American culture?

Answer those questions honestly and you will see why they are like a swarm of locusts devouring the infrastructure of our industrialized nation. Our healthcare system, our welfare system, our school system. All devoured, all destroyed, all in economic ruin.

We want justice! We want law! We want equality!

And yet when you read the posts 90% are from nazi hate preachers.
why?
Why do you allow them to post that 90%.
I had to read long and hard to find meaningful posts.


PS..
Dehumanizing Mexicans by calling they "swarm of locusts" is not a good choice of words. How about illegal immigrants flooding our boarders ……….

 

[RealmOfThePureForms]

And yet when you read the posts 90% are from nazi hate preachers.
why?
Why do you allow them to post that 90%.
I had to read long and hard to find meaningful posts.


PS..
Dehumanizing Mexicans by calling they "swarm of locusts" is not a good choice of words. How about illegal immigrants flooding our boarders ……….

Swarm of locusts was actually meant as a metephor for the destruction of our instrastructure (schools, hospitals, welfare system) by illegal immigrants in the same way that locusts come in and devour a farmers crops after he spent hours upon hours tirelessly working in the fields.

If you go to stormfront, and just read, you will see that there is alot of intelligent debate going on. There is a movement right now withing the WN movement in stormfront to try and ban all nazi symbols, and not allow any contact with any groups publicly or privately, that suppoer any kind of nazism. The problem that is occuring at this very moment in White Nationalism is that some whites see the swastika not as a nazi symbol but as an ancient symbol over 3,000 years old.

While I and many others have argued many times that this thought process is just the wrong way to go about it, free speech still exists. But even amongst the small fringe that using nazi symbols for hate purposes, they are mostly misguided youth who are angry. And WN's do have to deal with the smaller extremist movements that we do not share ideology with constantly trying to show seperation from these movements.

White Nations want seperation not violence. They simply want to live amongst their own kind. They do not support hitler, or the nazis. Hitler was a monster, hitler will always be a monster, he is a vile human being and he has hurt whites more than anything. 5 million Europeans perished because of hitler. And now because of hitler, simply wanting to preserve white culture and identity has become "racist".

So I'm sure that you can appreciate that many WN's actually hate what hitler has done and the fact that some whites actually idolize hitler.

Go to stormfront and read about the issues. You will see that what we are most concerned about is the ILLEGAL invasion of our country. The changing of our laws by illegals and unassimilated people, the destruction of American culture and of our history. It is not racism, it is self-preservation against racists who have declared that the time for purging whites from America has arrived.

Ask yourself, if we do not defend our rights, who will?

 

[cherokee]

RealmOfThePureForms]Swarm of locusts was actually meant as a metephor for the destruction of our instrastructure (schools, hospitals, welfare system) by illegal immigrants in the same way that locusts come in and devour a farmers crops after he spent hours upon hours tirelessly working in the fields.

reread my post....Dehumanizing Mexicans by calling they "swarm of locusts" is not a good choice of words. How about illegal immigrants flooding our boarders ……….

If you go to stormfront, and just read, you will see that there is alot of intelligent debate going on. There is a movement right now withing the WN movement in stormfront to try and ban all nazi symbols, and not allow any contact with any groups publicly or privately, that suppoer any kind of nazism. The problem that is occuring at this very moment in White Nationalism is that some whites see the swastika not as a nazi symbol but as an ancient symbol over 3,000 years old.

I have several times. I've seen more hate posts then anything thing else.
I know the swastika has been around for a long time its been used by people frin china to Native Americans.
BUT when it on a red flag or below an eagle its a nazi symbol.
If you want to talk more about your site lets do it in private.
I'm not going to start a board war here.

While I and many others have argued many times that this thought process is just the wrong way to go about it, free speech still exists. But even amongst the small fringe that using nazi symbols for hate purposes, they are mostly misguided youth who are angry. And WN's do have to deal with the smaller extremist movements that we do not share ideology with constantly trying to show seperation from these movements.

Yes free speech does exists but not when it calls for violence. Its up to you to guide the youth who come to your site.

White Nations want seperation not violence. They simply want to live amongst their own kind. They do not support hitler, or the nazis. Hitler was a monster, hitler will always be a monster, he is a vile human being and he has hurt whites more than anything. 5 million Europeans perished because of hitler. And now because of hitler, simply wanting to preserve white culture and identity has become "racist". So I'm sure that you can appreciate that many WN's actually hate what hitler has done and the fact that some whites actually idolize hitler.

Good that’s the message you need to get out.
We hate Hitler; we do not call for violence on any race.

Go to stormfront and read about the issues. You will see that what we are most concerned about is the ILLEGAL invasion of our country. The changing of our laws by illegals and unassimilated people, the destruction of American culture and of our history. It is not racism, it is self-preservation against racists who have declared that the time for purging whites from America has arrived. Ask yourself, if we do not defend our rights, who will.

And it will be seen a racism when you shout locusts.... deal with the matter as it should be.. Illegal immigrants, the safety of the US

 

[jamespol]

Ok let me say something:

THE MEDIA IS NOT ALL THAT LIBERAL

I like the mainstream Republicans.

Not the Republicans who are associated with Concerned Women for America who have nothing better to do but to obess with gays, and blame black people for all the problems in the world.

Come on now, they make up 12% of the population and yall act like they are the majority.

James

 

[jamespol]

Message to all the illegal Mexican protestors:

If Mexico is so great:

THEN WHY ARE YOU COMING HERE ILLEGALLY?

 

[Schweddy]

The poem in the original post is *not* new. Unsure of the original author or even if it can be found. The idea is not unique and makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately it is the harsh and direct approach that causes a lot of criticism.

I find your statement "White Nations want separation not violence. They simply want to live amongst their own kind." pretty flippin funny. America is the melting pot and as a result we *must* live together - if you do not like that then you are Un-American.

As for mixed offspring, I agree with you (sorta) on this. I believe that god created the races before creating Adam. Adam was called out because he was the direct descendant of the messiah. The bible is a story from Adam to Christ. Anyway, I feel we should live together in harmony but not disenfranchise the races with mixed offspring. We are all beautiful and we should keep it that way.

The illegal immigration thing is a seperate issue, try not to confuse it in your rehtoric.

As for the locus, you speek as though the prophesy was only about the United States. Very shallow thought indeed.

 

[jamespol]

Ok.

Interracial marriage and birth-- I am not very comfortable with.......but there is nothing we can do about it now.

Someone once told me, in a private message, that they do not thinks blacks should be able to vote. Their reasoning was because blacks vote in blocs and have such a large influence over elections, along with what would otherwise be a GOP-monolopy in the south ends up with quite a few elected Democrats.

But you can not just take away voting rights from an ethnic group just because they vote your opposing party.

I can see why blacks would vote Democrat like 50-60% of the time. But I do not see how they vote Democratic 85+% of the time. Makes no sense to me.

Here is a campaign tip for the GOP to get black votes: Look at Detroit, Philly, NYC, New Orleans: what have the DIMS done to help you? Bush's highest black is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Clinton's Highest Black was a secretary Bettie Currie.

LMAO!! I thought RealmOfThePureForms just made up that poem himself just to be mean. Ok I am sorry for overeacting.

But please forgive me, I am gay so I deserve special rights. (joking)


James

 

[Sir_Alec]

Ok.

Interracial marriage and birth-- I am not very comfortable with.......but there is nothing we can do about it now.

Someone once told me, in a private message, that they do not thinks blacks should be able to vote. Their reasoning was because blacks vote in blocs and have such a large influence over elections, along with what would otherwise be a GOP-monolopy in the south ends up with quite a few elected Democrats.

But you can not just take away voting rights from an ethnic group just because they vote your opposing party.

I can see why blacks would vote Democrat like 50-60% of the time. But I do not see how they vote Democratic 85+% of the time. Makes no sense to me.

Here is a campaign tip for the GOP to get black votes: Look at Detroit, Philly, NYC, New Orleans: what have the DIMS done to help you? Bush's highest black is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Clinton's Highest Black was a secretary Bettie Currie.

LMAO!! I thought RealmOfThePureForms just made up that poem himself just to be mean. Ok I am sorry for overeacting.

But please forgive me, I am gay so I deserve special rights. (joking)


James

Black people vote democrat most of the time because during the civil rights movement about 99% of those against integration were Republicans.

 

[jamespol]

I find that hard to believe.

I wasn't alive back then, but wasn't the South entirely Democratic before 1964??

I believe Blacks vote Democratic because of the "Southeran Strategy"

James

 

[Schweddy]

Black people vote democrat most of the time because during the civil rights movement about 99% of those against integration were Republicans.

Got any stats to backup that claim? lol

The reason why blacks vote democrat goes much further back than that - way back to the wigs and republicans split 1860's.

 

[jamespol]

Got any stats to backup that claim? lol

The reason why blacks vote democrat goes much further back than that - way back to the wigs and republicans split 1860's.

vauge== Statistically more Democrats voted against Civil Rights legislation then Republicans. I am a Democrat, but I know that very well.

vauge Please tell me is this claim true:

"Republicans in the south are not racist, they just get frusterated with them at the polls because they vote 90% Democratic, and causes several Democrats to be elected, of which would otherwise be a Republican monopoly. "

I mean things like Treasuer, Attorney General, Auditor, Secretary of State, and even the Governorship deal with the nuts and bolts of the government and not really ideological.

Senator and Represenatives are. Which is why Mississippi sends 2 ultra-conservatives to the Senate, though I do feel sorry for Trent Lott. That Bill Frist a**hat coordinated a plan to replace him as the Majority Leader. And Mississippi sends 2 ultra-conservative Republicans, 1 Conservative Democrat and 1 Moderate Democrat to congress. Mainly because those offices have become very ideological.

But I wonder why Alabama and Mississippi Legislature are still controlled by the DIMs.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Black people vote democrat most of the time because during the civil rights movement about 99% of those against integration were Republicans.

Sorry bout that,

1. Wrong. As far as I can remember the Republicans have always been about Civil Rights, Lincoln started it by freeing the slaves, if I remember correctly.
2. Constant drum beat of the liberal media and liberal politicians have brain washed many listeners. Not me.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Schweddy]

vauge== Statistically more Democrats voted against Civil Rights legislation then Republicans. I am a Democrat, but I know that very well.

I agree.

vauge Please tell me is this claim true:

"Republicans in the south are not racist, they just get frustrated with them at the polls because they vote 90% Democratic, and causes several Democrats to be elected, of which would otherwise be a Republican monopoly. "

Who is "them"?

I get more frustrated with people who do not vote their conscious than anyone of any race that votes. If consciously a person votes straight ticket - so be it. Hopefully they educated themselves to the issues and facts before flipping the switch. No longer can we require a reading and writing test to vote. With a reading/writing rate of 98% in the US I am unsure why that would be considered racism now...but I digress.

 

[jamespol]

I agree.


Who is "them"?

I get more frustrated with people who do not vote their conscious than anyone of any race that votes. If consciously a person votes straight ticket - so be it. Hopefully they educated themselves to the issues and facts before flipping the switch. No longer can we require a reading and writing test to vote. With a reading/writing rate of 98% in the US I am unsure why that would be considered racism now...but I digress.

Do you agree that the NAACP needs a make over!!

I would love to see the NAACP be a group for the advancement of all people of color, and have more reasonable leadership and steer away from partisian politics.

Many Republican principles could help blacks. For instance I think drugs are the main reasons the black community is still not equal to the white community. I think the Democrats position of ulimited welfare also hurts blacks.

James

 

[Schweddy]

For instance I think drugs are the main reasons the black community is still not equal to the white community. I think the Democrats position of ulimited welfare also hurts blacks.

Yes, the NAACP needs a makeover desparately. It should actually mean something again one day. First and foremost, they need integrity and a goal.

The above statement, I believe *all* youngsters here in the US are suffering because of drugs and the "thug" mentality. Street gangs and MTV are not of one color.

 

[jamespol]

Yes, the NAACP needs a makeover desparately. It should actually mean something again one day. First and foremost, they need integrity and a goal.

The above statement, I believe *all* youngsters here in the US are suffering because of drugs and the "thug" mentality. Street gangs and MTV are not of one color.

vauge, you put it in a better way then I did. I see Latinos (st. louis does have some latinos, but not a whole lot) acting so -called "blacker" then blacks here and in Texas. I see a lot of white thugs.

I love black people. They can be so great. There is a difference between Al Sharpton /Jesse Jackson/Cynthia McKinney and Condoleezza Rice/Barack Obama/Michael Steele.....

Al Sharpton is pretty stupid. Jackson and McKinney are not STUPID they are just radical. Condoleezza RIce is as sharp as a tack, Barack Obama , his politics are a bit to left for me but he is still sharp, and Michael Steele from Maryland is highly intelligent.

James

 

[Schweddy]

I love black people. They can be so great.

lol, I know what you're saying - but man that sounds racist itself. As though a black person is on another level or something.

Pick up a copy of Useful Idiots. Obviously it is biased, but you may start to have a new profound disrespect for Jessie. Also it is pretty interesting read.

 

[jamespol]

lol, I know what you're saying - but man that sounds racist itself. As though a black person is on another level or something.

Pick up a copy of Useful Idiots. Obviously it is biased, but you may start to have a new profound disrespect for Jessie. Also it is pretty interesting read.

So vauge, what do you suggess the NAACP does so it can actually have a purpose?

James

 

[RealmOfThePureForms]

The poem in the original post is *not* new. Unsure of the original author or even if it can be found. The idea is not unique and makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately it is the harsh and direct approach that causes a lot of criticism.

I find your statement "White Nations want separation not violence. They simply want to live amongst their own kind." pretty flippin funny. America is the melting pot and as a result we *must* live together - if you do not like that then you are Un-American.

As for mixed offspring, I agree with you (sorta) on this. I believe that god created the races before creating Adam. Adam was called out because he was the direct descendant of the messiah. The bible is a story from Adam to Christ. Anyway, I feel we should live together in harmony but not disenfranchise the races with mixed offspring. We are all beautiful and we should keep it that way.

The illegal immigration thing is a seperate issue, try not to confuse it in your rehtoric.

As for the locus, you speek as though the prophesy was only about the United States. Very shallow thought indeed.

It's funny you should speak about mixed offspring. While I am a White National, I am also married to an asian woman. I know even some WN's will be angry at me for this, but overall it comes down to culture much more than race and even many WN's agree about this.

For instance, WN's have no problem with most East Asians coming to America as immigrants. The reason is because East Asians rarely require assistance from any WN's. Just like whites, East Asians are capable of building self sustaining societies which are as advanced as any white nations is.

What most WN's get angry about, are when we have 1 million illegal and legal immigrants coming from nations that can't even keep their own infrastructure together. So what do these people do? They cause crime, they go on welfare, they drain the healthcare system, they have lots of babies they can't take care of, then they overpopulate the school system.

Whites and East Asians have similar cultures. They both are capable of building nations and sustaining order and prosperity in those nations. That cannot be said of Arabs, Blacks, or Hispanics. This is not a racist comment. This is an obervation of all the nations of the world at this very moment.

That Africa is a civil war nightmare of a continent, and no matter what excuses exist for them, the fact remains that Africans are just unable to create a self sustaining society without the help of whites.

Hispanics from Mexico all the way to South America are in civil war, fears of coup's, and civil unrest. They too are unable to create a self-sustaining society.

It is a proven historical fact that the only nations to ever grow stable and stay stable were of White or Asian origin. Nearly all the technological and scientific advancements of the world came from Whites and Asians.

In 40 years, at a current immigration rate of 1,000,000 per year not counting the llegals, the American infrastructure(healthcare, social security, medicade, healthcare, public school system, welfare) will COMPLETELY collapse unless immigration is reduced to 200,000 people a year or less. Just watch the 38 minute video in my sig to see how it is all explained. There are whites, blacks, hispanics, and asians in the audience, the video is not racist, doesn't talk about race, but just watch it and think of all the mexicans rushing the border. The video is an eye opener.

 

[alphamale]

Black people vote democrat most of the time because during the civil rights movement about 99% of those against integration were Republicans.

Nonsense - the chief opposition was Old South dixiecrats (southern democrats).

 

[nkgupta80]

It's funny you should speak about mixed offspring. While I am a White National, I am also married to an asian woman. I know even some WN's will be angry at me for this, but overall it comes down to culture much more than race and even many WN's agree about this.

For instance, WN's have no problem with most East Asians coming to America as immigrants. The reason is because East Asians rarely require assistance from any WN's. Just like whites, East Asians are capable of building self sustaining societies which are as advanced as any white nations is.

What most WN's get angry about, are when we have 1 million illegal and legal immigrants coming from nations that can't even keep their own infrastructure together. So what do these people do? They cause crime, they go on welfare, they drain the healthcare system, they have lots of babies they can't take care of, then they overpopulate the school system.

Whites and East Asians have similar cultures. They both are capable of building nations and sustaining order and prosperity in those nations. That cannot be said of Arabs, Blacks, or Hispanics. This is not a racist comment. This is an obervation of all the nations of the world at this very moment.

That Africa is a civil war nightmare of a continent, and no matter what excuses exist for them, the fact remains that Africans are just unable to create a self sustaining society without the help of whites.

Hispanics from Mexico all the way to South America are in civil war, fears of coup's, and civil unrest. They too are unable to create a self-sustaining society.

It is a proven historical fact that the only nations to ever grow stable and stay stable were of White or Asian origin. Nearly all the technological and scientific advancements of the world came from Whites and Asians.

In 40 years, at a current immigration rate of 1,000,000 per year not counting the llegals, the American infrastructure(healthcare, social security, medicade, healthcare, public school system, welfare) will COMPLETELY collapse unless immigration is reduced to 200,000 people a year or less. Just watch the 38 minute video in my sig to see how it is all explained. There are whites, blacks, hispanics, and asians in the audience, the video is not racist, doesn't talk about race, but just watch it and think of all the mexicans rushing the border. The video is an eye opener.

well hispanics (which are technically a mix between american natives and spanish peoples), before colonization had a pretty large stable empire in the Americas..

Arabs built the muslim empires which lasted till the end of the ottoman empire (only 100 years ago).

However, you have to simply realize that the world (geographically) is not an equal place. Places where the resources are available are where epople are gonna succeed. Obviously arabs living in the desert can only live a nomadic life. Obviously Africans living in infertile savannah lands and jungle climates will have a hard time building a prosperous civilization. Obviously the Americas, (being cut off from the old world required a later start. Horses were also unavailable thus giving more disadvantage.

So just to reiterate, race is really not the deciding factor.

 

[RealmOfThePureForms]

well hispanics (which are technically a mix between american natives and spanish peoples), before colonization had a pretty large stable empire in the Americas..

Arabs built the muslim empires which lasted till the end of the ottoman empire (only 100 years ago).

However, you have to simply realize that the world (geographically) is not an equal place. Places where the resources are available are where epople are gonna succeed. Obviously arabs living in the desert can only live a nomadic life. Obviously Africans living in infertile savannah lands and jungle climates will have a hard time building a prosperous civilization. Obviously the Americas, (being cut off from the old world required a later start. Horses were also unavailable thus giving more disadvantage.

So just to reiterate, race is really not the deciding factor.

Arabs about 2000 years ago had a wonderfully advanced society on par with Europe and Asia. But when Islam spread throughout the region around 600 AD, the entire culture collapsed into a blood thirsty war machine based on religious indoctrination. From that point on you could say that the Arab race went from a cultured enlightened people, to a militaristic religious people. They were doing quite fine in their land area prior to Islam.

Also while Africans had to deal with Jungles, Europeans had to deal with long cold harsh winters. People made due with what was available to them. In Europe wheat was plentiful so bread was the staple food. Because the area was large and open, and not crowded their was room to grow it. In Asia on the other hand, like in Japan, it was much more overcrowded. So they planted rice patties which could grow in smaller areas, and produce alot of food. The reason rice is so popular in asia and bread so popular in Europe is because of the circumstances and land areas each group was living.

If Africans could not figure out how to make things work on that large continent (surely there were some areas that food could grow) while small nations could make due with the little land they had and become successful then you can't really blame the land.

Well the Spanish (European Spanish which are whites) had a stabalized colonization in the Mexico area. Then the colonies rebelled against the Spanish and started calling themselves Mexicans and broke away. Once they broke away and began adopting the cultures of the local people they lost their Western European culture and their society fell apart.

On the other hand, the white Europeans who came to America largely kept the traditions of Europe, the culture of Europe, and the work ethnic of Europe. As a result they were able to build yet another successful nation in America.

The difference between the Mexicans and the Americans was that the Mexicans (as you said formerly Spanish who mixed with the locals) abanadoned their European roots in favor of the local culture, while the Americans did not. So the Americans flourished and the Mexicans did not.