- Sep 22, 2005
- Reaction score
- Los Angeles
- Political Leaning
Well, makes sense to me. Why work here when you're being robbed? They have skills. Why shouldn't they take those skills and sell them where they get the most use out of them and the most respect for them?America: Love it or (if you're rich enough) leave it?
September 19, 2010 | 11:34 am
Glen Esnard, a Newport Beach executive for real estate services firm Grubb & Ellis, went to bat in the Wall Street Journal last week for high-income-earners who believe it’s unfair that their tax rates should rise on Jan. 1, as President Obama proposes.
Esnard also suggested that the answer might be for the better-heeled to find a new country.
In a letter to the newspaper, Esnard wrote that although he includes himself in the population earning more than $250,000 a year:
My family isn't wealthy. I have no funded retirement plan save Social Security, if it is there when I need it. I have no guarantee of permanent health care. I am paying off school loans for our three children. A meaningful number of my friends have lost their jobs, and all who are still employed, including my family, have taken significant pay reductions. . . . This is a classless recession, at least in my experience. It is hitting everyone.
Yet those of us who make $250,000 or more are vilified and held accountable for solving our government's penchant for spending more than it takes in so that politicians can buy votes. We already pay more in taxes than 98% of the population, particularly the nearly 50% of eligible voters who pay no federal income tax. The president wants us to pay more, and he frames it in a way that casts us as not yet carrying our fair share of the burden.
Apparently our president thinks that living in America is so wonderful that we will never leave, despite being directly attacked and held responsible for the political class's inability to constrain its desire to buy votes with our money. He should think again.
Esnard's letter caught the eye of Reuters blogger Felix Salmon, who wasn’t exactly sympathetic.
I emailed Esnard to ask if he seriously expected high-income-earners to think of leaving the country because their tax rate would rise to 39.6% from 35% (their dividend and capital gains tax rates also would jump), and/or because of Obama's "vilification" campaign, as Esnard put it.
He responded: "Although I am not an expert, I think it is a real issue. No different than people leaving states for more hospitable locations." He also said he has received a "surprising number of resonant e-mails and voicemails."
Where could an American tax refugee go?
If a man has savings or enough liquidity, why shouldn't he lay off the superfluous employees and reduce the size of the target on his chest by reducing his income? How many wealthy people are there, right now, wondering if they're best course is to close their business and retire?
Who's fault will it be if this happens?