• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Air America Radio Finds Buyer; Al Franken to Depart

Cold Dirt

Banned
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
370
Reaction score
18
Location
GA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Submitted by mark on January 29, 2007 - 2:04pm.
New York - Liberal talk radio network Air America Radio announced on Monday that it has reached a tentative agreement to be acquired by Stephen Green, chairman of New York real estate firm SL Green Realty Corp.

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The company also announced that Al Franken -- its top on-air personality -- will leave the company next month.

"Because I'm a businessman who enjoys creating and growing companies, I'm purchasing a majority ownership in Air America with the intention of making it a successful business that returns a profit," said Green.

"To assure that AAR survives and thrives, we'll do three things. First, we'll stabilize its finances. Second, we'll build on its line-up to assure the best radio talent possible, since in the long run content is king. And third, we'll extend this special brand by partnering with other platforms beyond radio to make sure that Air America's content reaches the wide audience it deserves."

http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/01...nken-to-depart

In other words....Al (The Idiot) Franken and Randy (The Butch) Rhodes....YOU SUCK!
 
I've always complained that Al Franken was, well... boring! I hope they find some liberal talk show host who will kick conservative @ss on the air. We need a left-wing version of Rush on the air, someone who won't *****foot around!
That assumes the new buyer plans to keep it a liberal talk station. My guess is it will be another country station by next week.
 
I hope there will never be a left wing Rush Limbaugh. He is morally corrupt and completely without conscience. He and other hate radio hosts are the reason Americans are so divided politically.
 
That assumes the new buyer plans to keep it a liberal talk station. My guess is it will be another country station by next week.
No I think it will stay talk radio....liberal or not I don't know......they want something that will show a profit then conservative talk for sure......but I really hope that a liberal talk radio stay on the air.......Its my comedic fix when I need it....no matter how bad things are going in my life....all I have to do is turn on liberal talk radio...after 30 minutes of nothing but whining and belly aching from the libs....my life doesn't seem quite so bad.......damn liberals are the most miserable people on the planet........cheer me up in no time.......:2rofll:
 
I hope there will never be a left wing Rush Limbaugh. He is morally corrupt and completely without conscience. He and other hate radio hosts are the reason Americans are so divided politically.

Or it could be that you liberals hated Bush from the get go........the liberal media was around way before Rush came on the air......maybe that could be a bit of the cause......ya thunk
 
I hope there will never be a left wing Rush Limbaugh. He is morally corrupt and completely without conscience. He and other hate radio hosts are the reason Americans are so divided politically.
Actually it's just the opposite opinion from yours, but if calling it hate radio and morally corrupt help you sleep at night, then by all means...

:lol:
 
Last edited:
Or it could be that you liberals hated Bush from the get go........the liberal media was around way before Rush came on the air......maybe that could be a bit of the cause......ya thunk

Did Rush tell you that? People, and not just liberals, have grown to hate Bush's policies, his dishonesty, his secrecy, his Constitution-shredding, his pandering, and his power-grabbing. Why do you think liberals hate Bush for some inexplicable reason (because actually he's just a really nice guy)? The "liberal media" as you call it (corporate media to me) was fairly balanced before the Fairness Doctrine was repealed. Hate radio is an invention of the right.
 
I hope there will never be a left wing Rush Limbaugh. He is morally corrupt and completely without conscience. He and other hate radio hosts are the reason Americans are so divided politically.





You're absolutely right, what was I thinking?

Rush deals in lies, innuendos, misinformation, and gossip. He is morally bankrupt but he is richer than sin because of all the above reasons. If Rush told the truth he wouldn't last one year on the air. Much like Air-America!
 
Did Rush tell you that? People, and not just liberals, have grown to hate Bush's policies, his dishonesty, his secrecy, his Constitution-shredding, his pandering, and his power-grabbing. Why do you think liberals hate Bush for some inexplicable reason (because actually he's just a really nice guy)? The "liberal media" as you call it (corporate media to me) was fairly balanced before the Fairness Doctrine was repealed. Hate radio is an invention of the right.

I don't listen to Rush....so stick that in your crack pipe.......

lies lies lies.....you people hated Bush from the get go....you're lies are exposed by your own very words in the above post.............

BS the liberal media hasn't been fair since the Vietnam war when people like Kerry had lies to tell and the liberal media was eager to report them.......same same as now........
 
lies lies lies.....you people hated Bush from the get go....you're lies are exposed by your own very words in the above post.............

How so?

Yes, a lot of liberals didn't like Bush from the start, but the intense, widespread anti-Bush sentiments (and not just among liberals) didn't come until later... and it came for the reasons that Chanda listed.

And if you're trying to trace the source of the political divide in America, it goes back a LOT farther than Bush's election... look at what Newt Gingrich did in the Clinton years, for one. "Us people" not liking Bush isn't the root of it.
 
I've always complained that Al Franken was, well... boring! I hope they find some liberal talk show host who will kick conservative @ss on the air. We need a left-wing version of Rush on the air, someone who won't *****foot around!

You already have him, his name is Ed Schultz and he is a rhetoric filled partisan blowhard just as bad as the aforementioned Lambaugh.
 
No, it isn't "just the opposite opinion of mine." Limbaugh gets paid $18M a year to dispense pure propaganda. He distorts the truth and when called on it, he excuses his behavior by saying it's OK because he isn't a news reporter--he's an entertainer.
And if their were a liberal talk show host that could have his measure of success, you'd love it. Jealous run amok!
 
I hope there will never be a left wing Rush Limbaugh. He is morally corrupt and completely without conscience. He and other hate radio hosts are the reason Americans are so divided politically.
No. Comments like that are the reason Americans are so divided.
 
And if their were a liberal talk show host that could have his measure of success, you'd love it. Jealous run amok!

Are you calling me a hypocrite? On what basis?
 
No, it isn't "just the opposite opinion of mine." Limbaugh gets paid $18M

Whether or not that number is correct he MAKES that money in the production company he and Roger Ailes own by creating a production that people listen to so advertisers see a market they are willing to pay to get their message to.

a year to dispense pure propaganda.

His opinion on the news of the day.

He distorts the truth and when called on it, he excuses his behavior by saying it's OK because he isn't a news reporter--he's an entertainer.

His opinions of it are not distortions anymore than Chris Matthews or Kieth Oberman.

It's an open market place, instead of whinning about Limbaugh compete with him in the arena of ideas. Put yours against his.
 
You already have him, his name is Ed Schultz and he is a rhetoric filled partisan blowhard just as bad as the aforementioned Lambaugh.

It's too bad he tries too hard to be an alternative to Limbaugh, he'd have a better show.
 
No. Comments like that are the reason Americans are so divided.

No, my comment was a fair and valid assessment based on the proven facts of Limbaugh's actions, and not a broadbrush generalization about an entire group of people. What has divided America is the unfair and false generalizations about liberals that have reverberated throughout rightwing radio, for example:

Throughout his 3-hour show consisting mostly of the villification of liberals and glorification of Republicans, Limbaugh continually accuses (all) Democrats of being fools and communists. According to him, women's rights proponents are "(ugly) feminazis," and anyone who opposes him is "attempting to destroy America."

It is routine for Sean Hannity to label ALL Democrats as "vulgar, disgusting, hypocrites," and fools and liars.

Michael Savage/Weiner quotes: Democrats and Liberals are “vermin," "garbage,” "the enemy,” and "the enemy within." He routinely accuses Democrats and Liberals of “stabbing American soldiers in the back.” (Of those who oppose us in Iraq, he says…) “…wipe the vermin off the planet… and wipe their women out with them!”
(In the public school system, “Liberals” are teaching children that…) “…homosexual behavior is not only good, it’s better than heterosexual behavior!”

These false and hate-filled generalizations are then repeated ad nauseum by listeners (you can see examples even on this site), resulting in counter-attacks and creating a vicious cycle which has resulted in an alarming political division of Americans, and it all started with rightwing radio years before liberals had any sort of similar platform.
 
Last edited:
No, my comment was a fair and valid assessment based on the proven facts of Limbaugh's actions, and not a broadbrush generalization about an entire group of people. What has divided America is the unfair and false generalizations about liberals that have reverberated throughout rightwing radio, for example:

Throughout his 3-hour show consisting mostly of the villification of liberals and glorification of Republicans, Limbaugh continually accuses (all) Democrats of being fools and communists. According to him, women's rights proponents are "(ugly) feminazis," and anyone who opposes him is "attempting to destroy America."

It is routine for Sean Hannity to label ALL Democrats as "vulgar, disgusting, hypocrites," and fools and liars.

Michael Savage/Weiner quotes: Democrats and Liberals are “vermin," "garbage,” "the enemy,” and "the enemy within." He routinely accuses Democrats and Liberals of “stabbing American soldiers in the back.” (Of those who oppose us in Iraq, he says…) “…wipe the vermin off the planet… and wipe their women out with them!”
(In the public school system, “Liberals” are teaching children that…) “…homosexual behavior is not only good, it’s better than heterosexual behavior!”

These false and hate-filled generalizations are then repeated ad nauseum by listeners (you can see examples even on this site), resulting in counter-attacks and creating a vicious cycle which has resulted in an alarming political division of Americans, and it all started with rightwing radio years before liberals had any sort of similar platform.


Which I believe that what they say is mostly true.......but tell me, when did this country become a majority liberal?

Haven't you heard of the silent majority which mostly consider themselves to be moderates?

So if Rush and Hannity are the cause of the political division in this country....how do they effect the people that dont listen to them, which btw, is the silent majority?

Rush and Hannity are saying what the liberal media wont say and which many of us have been waiting for someone to have the balls to say.........

And dont tell me that this all started with Rush.....Rush wasnt even on the air until 91.....now tell me when Reagan was elected.......I bet youre to young to remember the attacks and what he was called by the left back in the 80's by the liberal media.........you want to blame someone for the current political division.....start reading history little one because it all started with you liberals.......
 
Last edited:
And if their were a liberal talk show host that could have his measure of success, you'd love it.

This statement is an accusation of hypocrisy. I'm not jealous of your Rush Limbaugh. I'm thankful he's on your side instead of mine, because he is an embarrassment to informed and truthful conservatives. I once asked a conservative friend if she listened to Rush, and she told me that, even though she agreed with many of his positions, the deceit he used to make his case for them was morally wrong. For some, the end doesn't justify the means.
 
This statement is an accusation of hypocrisy. I'm not jealous of your Rush Limbaugh. I'm thankful he's on your side instead of mine, because he is an embarrassment to informed and truthful conservatives. I once asked a conservative friend if she listened to Rush, and she told me that, even though she agreed with many of his positions, the deceit he used to make his case for them was morally wrong. For some, the end doesn't justify the means.

Sounds like you've never listened to Randi Rhodes.... No one is more venomous than her or lies as much as she does.

She's so bad that she's being sued by a company for the vicous lies she said about it on the air. At least Rush has never been sued for lying.
 
Sounds like you've never listened to Randi Rhodes.... No one is more venomous than her or lies as much as she does.

She's so bad that she's being sued by a company for the vicous lies she said about it on the air. At least Rush has never been sued for lying.

The case has been dismissed in a U.S. District court and now CACI is appealing. Watch this video and then tell me if you side with the whistleblower or the company that tortures for profit:

CACI - Iraq for Sale Movie Blog
 
I listened to Randi Rhodes this morning for the first time, found her broadcast interesting and fact filled. In America it's innocent until proven guilty in a court of law so, no one can state she lied yet until proven by her peers in a court of law.

If you can provide truths toward your belief she has lied during her broadcast, please counter with those truths and facts instead of caste haste negativity from the assumption she is a Liberal, which is anti-American in the eyes of many conservatives.
 
Back
Top Bottom