- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,604
- Reaction score
- 32,681
- Location
- Cambridge, MA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
The Individual Mandate Was Not Essential After All
Few parts of the ACA were more controversial than the “individual mandate.” During the 2008 Democratic primary, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama clashed over the necessity of requiring individuals to buy health coverage if they could afford it. First introduced by Republicans in 1993, most experts and virtually all insurers viewed the mandate as essential to simultaneously requiring equal access to coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Yet, it caused staunch allies to blanch during the 2009 Congressional debate and was subject to Constitutional challenges decided twice by the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the tax linked to the individual mandate was repealed as part of the massive Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. Even though discerning its impact amidst other changes is challenging, the foretold implosion of the individual market without the individual mandate did not occur.
Premium Tax Credits Have Been Extra Important
A second surprise has been the unexpectedly effective role of health insurance marketplace premium tax credits. At passage, these tax credits were viewed as important, although limited in value and constrained by eligibility floors and ceilings at 100 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). When the Trump administration ceased payments for cost sharing reductions in 2017, despite the ongoing requirement that insurers lower cost sharing for enrollees with income below 250 percent of FPL, the premium tax credits were able to absorb the cost through “silver loading.” Moreover, modifications to the tax credits in the 2021 American Rescue Plan, continued by the Inflation Reduction Act through 2025, contributed to a doubling of marketplace enrollment. This helped prevent major coverage loss after the COVID-19 pandemic, defying expectations, and achieve the original projected marketplace enrollment goal of 24 million. Congress must continue these tax credit changes in the coming months to prevent lower enrollment, higher premiums, and more uninsured Americans.
Fixing Rather Than Adding Programs Was More Effective
[...]While the limited impact of the high-risk pool program was not a total surprise, the massive amount of work for small gains was unexpected—as was the repeat across the ACA of changes to existing programs outperforming new programs. Other examples include the enduring benefit of consumer regulations in private insurance (e.g., medical loss ratios) versus the new consumer-run plan, COOPs, whose funding was repealed; and the greater impact of the statutory Medicare accountable care organizations versus the models added by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Part of the success in improving coverage, costs, and outcomes of the ACA’s Medicaid expansion is that it extended the existing program.
You only celebrate spending money if you got a good deal.
No mystery there. That’s actually the official GOP position. Support the program but don’t acknowledge its origin and your previous opposition. Sort of like Reagan and Medicare. Ronnie condemned it as a threat to freedom, but then did nothing to harm it when in office.Some of the funniest videos I've ever seen are Republicans on the street who say that they like the ACA but they hate Obamacare.
Which is to say, the individual mandate was somewhat useful, but not nearly as useful as simply making the ACA's premium subsidies more generous and available even to middle and upper middle class families.
Wrong.
The money not put in did not miraculously appear from nowhere.
What “money not put in”?
From the individual mandate.
And this money magically appears?better subsidies
And this money magically appears?
With less coming in because the mandate was repealed.It came from the same place as it has since the marketplaces opened in 2014, the Treasury.
With less coming in because the mandate was repealed.
The individual mandate was bringing in ~$3-3.5 billion in revenue a year. ACA marketplace subsidies alone last year were $10 billion cheaper with the more generous subsidies than they were projected to be with the original less generous subsidies.
HELLO! where the **** did the subsidies magically appear from ?
They've been written into the ACA since the beginning.
Nobody is suggesting that it did. It was budgeted from the beginning. @Greenbeard has said as much several times. What point are you really trying to make?And, again, where do they come from?
Does the money magically fall from the sky ?
Nobody is suggesting that it did. It was budgeted from the beginning. @Greenbeard has said as much several times. What point are you really trying to make?
So, we are using tax money we would not need to if the mandate was not lifted. Why can't you admit this ?
This is of no relevance.the subsidies cost less last year with the beefed-up Biden subsidies and no individual mandate than they were projected to with the original Obama subsidies and an individual mandate
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?