• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Affidavit: McVeigh had high-level help

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,257
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
According to a court affidavit filed by Terry Nichols, he and McVeigh were being directed by the government in the Oklahoma City bombing.

The surprising thing about this affadavit is that the FBI, the Justice Department, the US Attorney's office, and gun dealer Roger Moore, all have no comment. You would think that, if this were some conspiracy theory, there would be denials.

On the other hand, one might want to consider the source - A convicted mass murderer.

Article is here.
 
According to a court affidavit filed by Terry Nichols, he and McVeigh were being directed by the government in the Oklahoma City bombing.

Tinfoil hat, anyone?

danarhea said:
The surprising thing about this affadavit is that the FBI, the Justice Department, the US Attorney's office, and gun dealer Roger Moore, all have no comment. You would think that, if this were some conspiracy theory, there would be denials.

Why would they want to lend credibility to any idiotic theory that someone makes, by denying it? The tinfoil crowd interprets denials as evidence of a conspiracy anyway. Nichols and McVeigh were tinfoilers themselves, so why would they be working with the government on a conspiracy?

danarhea said:
On the other hand, one might want to consider the source - A convicted mass murderer.

Article is here.

Yes. Indeed one might want to consider that source. So why did you bother posting this in the first place?
 
Tinfoil hat, anyone?



Why would they want to lend credibility to any idiotic theory that someone makes, by denying it? The tinfoil crowd interprets denials as evidence of a conspiracy anyway. Nichols and McVeigh were tinfoilers themselves, so why would they be working with the government on a conspiracy?



Yes. Indeed one might want to consider that source. So why did you bother posting this in the first place?

You might ask the Salt Lake City Tribune the same question.
 
As far as I know, their editors don't post on this message board. But you do.

There editors and writers have a readership in the hundreds of thousands, so that makes what they print important enough for me to post here. If you don't like that, there are always other threads (at least a few hundred) you can go to.
 
Back
Top Bottom