• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

A very informative lecture of Rabbi Kahane

Around 18:30 he says that no regard should be shown for the lives of civilians.
What schmutz! That's one of THE defining characteristics of terrorist.
NO, No, No!

You are taking his words out of context, and it's very sad that you do that.

He was talking about a situation in which there is a battle and the IDF risk his soldiers because of innocent civilians that are in the battle zone (human shields etc) on the back of his soldiers.

Or are you telling me that big America would have danger it's soldiers in battles and have mercy on the civil population of it's enemy when it's soldiers would be in danger?

Yeah right...
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

Because you say they were not framed.
If they weren't framed, then it must be a true charge.
I don't understand.

Yet another source for the claim that the Israeli govt declared them to be terrorists

Background Information on Foreign Terrorist Organizations
Kahane Chai a.k.a. Kahane Lives, the Kfar Tapuah Fund, The Judean Voice, The Judean Legion, The Way of the Torah, The Yeshiva of the Jewish Idea, KOACH

Description: Stated goal is to restore the biblical state of Israel. Kach (founded by radical Israeli-American rabbi Meir Kahane) and its offshoot Kahane Chai, which means "Kahane Lives," (founded by Meir Kahane's son Binyamin following his father's assassination in the United States) were declared to be terrorist organizations in March 1994 by the Israeli Cabinet under the 1948 Terrorism Law. This followed the groups' statements in support of Dr. Baruch Goldstein's attack in February 1994 on the al-Ibrahimi Mosque--Goldstein was affiliated with Kach--and their verbal attacks on the Israeli Government.

Indeed, I didn't look at the end of the page in Wikipedia where it says that the Israeli government declared that it's a terrorist organization and I missed it.

They declared that because of the murder that was in the mosque/synagogue but I'm telling you that I don't believe the lies of the Left government that declared that because there was no evidence that he murdered them in general and murdered them in the name of Kach in particular.

You must understand that this happened 4 years after the assassination of Kahane. He is not related to it at all.
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

...people like you...
Oh yeah this helps the conversation.

It sounds just like yet another wacky ME terrorist's rant.

I guess God didn't help the Kach come to power in the "coming decade." ;( Hate that for you FoJ.
Also he seems to have been wrong about how much power Kach would have in the "next election" Oh, well.
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

I guess God didn't help the Kach come to power in the "coming decade."
The ways of G-d are not known to you and to me.

G-d also didn't help the Jews in the first exile and in the second exile when two of the temples were destroyed and when the nation was exiled. He had his reasons for that.

Also he seems to have been wrong about how much power Kach would have in the "next election" Oh, well.
Not him, the ones who fear from Kahane to take their seats in the Knesset. He had polls that showed that.
 
NO, No, No!
You are taking his words out of context, and it's very sad that you do that.
He was talking about a situation in which there is a battle and the IDF risk his soldiers because of innocent civilians that are in the battle zone (human shields etc) on the back of his soldiers.
No it's not out of context. Advocating intentional disregard for the safety of civilians is intentional disregard for the safety of civilians.

The face of Jacob said:
Or are you telling me that big America would have danger it's soldiers in battles and have mercy on the civil population of it's enemy when it's soldiers would be in danger?
While it's entirely irrelevant, yes, the US does go out of it's way to show regard for the lives of civilians. It's one of the ways that we're better than terrorists.
However, as I noted, your to quoque is irrelevant.
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

The ways of G-d are not known to you and to me.
Sure, whatever, but the "coming decade" has been and gone w/o the Kach coming to power.

The face of Jacob said:
Not him, the ones who fear from Kahane to take their seats in the Knesset. He had polls that showed that.
They weren't needed for the Likud to govern in that election. Just didn't happen.
 
No it's not out of context. Advocating intentional disregard for the safety of civilians is intentional disregard for the safety of civilians.


While it's entirely irrelevant, yes, the US does go out of it's way to show regard for the lives of civilians. It's one of the ways that we're better than terrorists.
However, as I noted, your to quoque is irrelevant.
So you are saying that when the life of the American soldiers are in danger than the life of their enemy civilians are more important than the life of the American soldiers and that the American army will risk them?

What are you talking about? The USA's army destroyed complete villiges in Afganistan from the air with no hesitation what so ever, not mention Heroshima and Nagasaki.

You are well famillar with the saying that the American policeman first shoot and then ask who's there.

Please don't give advices to the Israeli army which is too much (too much) moral than all the armies of the world, including the American army.
 
So you are saying that when the life of the American soldiers are in danger than the life of their enemy civilians are more important than the life of the American soldiers and that the American army will risk them?
I said what I said. Why try to put words into my mouth?

The US does show regard for the lives of civilians (which is entirely irrelevant to this conversation and is your attempt to use a logical fallacy to advance your argument).
Kahane said regard for the lives for civilians lives should not be shown.
That's what we're talking about.

The face of Jacob said:
Please don't give advices to the Israeli army which is too much (too much) moral than all the armies of the world, including the American army.
I'm not sure how you came to the egregiously and exceptionally erroneous conclusion that I was giving advice to the IDF.
All I did was point out that Kahane advocated not showing regard for the lives of civilians.

All this other stuff- how the US conducts military operations, the IDF, rumors about US police etc- is beside the point that Kahane said that their shouldn't be regard for the lives of civilians.


fwfiw, it was Kahane who was giving advice to the IDF w/ his comments.
 
just after the 49:00 mark
He's also an end-times nut-job. Lovely.
 
beside the point that Kahane said that their shouldn't be regard for the lives of civilians.
Again I'm telling you that you took his words out of context and this is what you did also in the first reference of yours, the ones who read it didn't understand from your words that he talked about a battle scence.
 
just after the 49:00 mark
He's also an end-times nut-job. Lovely.
Maybe for people who don't believe and have no knowledge in the Jewish books he is an end-times nut-job.

What he said is written in our holy books (well, I guess they are not holy for you) and accepted by our great rabbis through all the generations, and he is a rabbi also, do you think that it's appropriate that you will show such a disrespect to our holy books or to his knowledge in these books?

I didn't find anything wrong with what he said in the 49:00 minute.
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

Though in the video he did call for an ethnic cleansing campain against them. Im surprised the hate speah rule doesnt apply to this. Even so it proves my point that extremism, bigotry and fundamentalism exist on BOTH sides of the arab-isreali conflict.

Just because it's not neo-liberal propaganda and the rabbi's opinion differs from you and those of you neo-liberal buddy's, DOES NOT MAKE IT HATE SPEECH.

Shame on you sir.

*slap* *slap* *slap* *slap* *slap*
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

No, you continue not to answer my questions.

105:38 is the end of the movie, I didn't hear him saying that but I believe you regarding the quote that you gave (I'm gonna check it later on cause usually I don't believe a word of yours).

What he said about Palestinians and the law is not a racist comment (only morons may think it is, or anti-semite Europeans who feel balme for the holocaust and now they try to blame the Jews for being Nazis to the Arabs) and it's not insulting at all. The Palestinians, as a society, wish that all Jews would be destroyed, he was completely correct.

The only insulting in all of that are the Palestinians themselves that as a society they support the murder of Jews.

Another insulting thing is people like you who distort the history on the back of the Jews.

And I want to remind you that you didn't answer my questions!

What questions have i not answerd?. By attacking an entire race [the arabs] you and he are, by definition being racist. Unless all arabs are exact clones of each other then surely there is a degree of variation in what they think.

And just to prove a point around 01.28/1.05.38 the guy introduceing the talk says "Rabbi Kahane calls for the expulsion of the arabs from the Isreali borders" Now look up enthic cleansing and you see the link.
 
Last edited:
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

What questions have i not answerd?.
Are you making a competition with GarzaUK who is the one among you who does't read my posts above?

By attacking an entire race
An entire race that absorbs the hate for Jews from its mother's breasts (that's been said by your pastor John Hagee, not by me), when its being taught from the age of zero that Jews are children of apes and pigs, that they should be kicked out of their tiny land and that they should be destroyed in the name of Jihad. An entire race that ATTACKED AND STILL ATTACKING THE JEWISH RACE.

I'm not surprised at all that anti-semites don't mention these "small details" that I mentioned.

It's you who are a racist, it's you who are an anti-semite, it's you who are the attacker.

And just to prove a point around 01.28/1.05.38 the guy introduceing the talk says "Rabbi Kahane calls for the expulsion of the arabs from the Isreali borders" Now look up enthic cleansing and you see the link.
Excellent!

We don't need Arab enemy inside our house too, we have enough of them outside.
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

Are you making a competition with GarzaUK who is the one among you who does't read my posts above?


An entire race that absorbs the hate for Jews from its mother's breasts (that's been said by your pastor John Hagee, not by me), when its being taught from the age of zero that Jews are children of apes and pigs, that they should be kicked out of their tiny land and that they should be destroyed in the name of Jihad. An entire race that ATTACKED AND STILL ATTACKING THE JEWISH RACE.

I'm not surprised at all that anti-semites don't mention these "small details" that I mentioned.

It's you who are a racist, it's you who are an anti-semite.


Excellent!

We don't need Arab enemy inside our house too, we have enough of them outside.

John Hagee isnt someone i pay a great deal of attention to:confused:

Either way. You have admitted the support of both you and your mullah for kicking the Arabs out of Isreal [I.E ethnic cleansing]. You have stated in no uncertain terms you hatred of the Arab people [I.E racism]. We both think that your are a racist who supports ethnic cleansing.

Therefore we are in agreement accept on the fact ive never said anything against the jewish people as a whole. All im against is those who commit human rights atrocities just as i say things against those serbian's, morrocans, americans ,ulsterman, and englishmen who do the same. Theres no predudice involved there. You on the other hand constantly tar an entire enthic group with one brush.
 
Last edited:
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

Just because it's not neo-liberal propaganda and the rabbi's opinion differs from you and those of you neo-liberal buddy's, DOES NOT MAKE IT HATE SPEECH.

Shame on you sir.

*slap* *slap* *slap* *slap* *slap*

Thats not what i said. How can calling for ethnic cleansing not be racist?
 
Re: I guess you were unaware of this information.

I think it's dangerous to say that any country should have claim to a territory because what a religious text says. Its' a position that can't be negotiated, moderated, or compromised. What's more it can't in anyway influenced by current reality. Books after all are not aware of the world being no more or less then collections of symbols inked onto thin pieces of treated plant fiber. In the end you have to rely upon human intelligence and judgment to work out these problems.

After all what happens when one book disagrees with another book? Are these two books ever going to come to some kind of compromise or mutual understanding? Of course not. They're incapable of understanding their own point let alone some other book's position. As such you're setting yourself up for an infinite war unless of course you just completely wipe out the opposition. And is that really a good solution? To have one book win out over another through force of arms?

I know this sounds like a silly argument because after all no one has ever claimed that books are in themselves thinking things. But when you base questions of morality and territorial boundaries on books you are taking a leap of faith. That's fine if it just involves your own life or doesn't hurt anyone else. But when you talk about what boarders should be or how OTHER people should act it becomes a problem.

I don't say this to slam this gentleman from israel as he's frankly very moderate when compared to many of the arab leaders that I've listened to. But I'm made uncomfortable by statements to the effect of "my religious text says this so my foreign policy should be this"... that sounds very irresponsible and dangerous to me. Especially since I've never read a religious text that was a manual on political conduct. I find more to respect in the works of Machiavelli then in the old testament when it comes to political maneuvers. He was at least intentionally writing about politics.
 
Last edited:
Find a racist comment of him regarding Arabs and let us all know.

Does he express racist comments against Arabs in this video?

Rabbi Meir Kahane’s claim in the video that an Arab (Gentile) can become Jewish, should remove the word “racist“ from this thread. Apparently some people (more than one of them around here) could use a good dictionary.

A law removing the citizenship of “unpatriotic” Israelis would not be ethnic cleansing. But, the forceful removal of Arabs (that are not Jews) from Israel and the West Bank and Gaza, “peacefully” shipping them off to Jordan, which is what the Rabbi Meir Kahane indorsed in the video, would be ethnic cleansing. Get a dictionary if you have a problem with what I just said.

People can be ethnically diverse, have different religions, and be of the same race (born of the same ancestral father). An ethnic difference between people of the same race could be as simple as which end of the egg you break. I crack my egg in the middle, but I am quite sure that a “liberal” like Red Dave is all over the place.

Defending your culture is ok, but I am quite certain that such an obvious ethnic cleansing as advocated in the video will make the US your enemy. I do not like the idea of a war between the US and Israel, and it would make me puke to be allied in your destruction with black stone idolaters that talk to rocks and trees. Please be careful.

I would suggest you read the works of Josephus, starting with “The Wars of the Jews or The History of the Destruction of Jerusalem.“ Please do not make a similar mistake, and make the most powerful nation on earth your enemy. :cool:
 
Israel is a strategic regional ally that would have to do a LOT more then that to get the US to take military action again them. If they deported all arabs from israel that would all but end the israeli US alliance... it might just barely survive that... but it wouldn't be anywhere close to enough for the US to take military action against israel. Many people under estimate the strength of that alliance... it's profoundly deep.


Further while I would agree that that would be ethnic cleansing, that term is typically associated with the practice of killing off a given ethnicity... not deporting them. And again under that logic we can point at nearly every single arab state and make similar claims. The intolerance towards other cultures creates an atmosphere in which anyone not of their group feels very uncomfortable and is subjected to varying kinds of harressment. Effectively this gets people to leave or convert which while not a clear policy of ethnic cleansing does cause the demographics of those countries to become increasingly homogeneous.
 
Here is a very good example what happens when Jews and Arabs are living together:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiG4-TXDCbg[/youtube]

In Halisa neighbourhood in Haifa, where Jews and Arabs live together, there was this dialog:

A Jewish resident: "Can't you see the holes of the shootings in here (in the walls)?"
A Journalist: "Who is shooting here?"
A Jewish resident: "Who is shooting here? The nice guys that live beside me, they don't want me to live here, they don't want a Jew to live here."
An Arab resident: "Not true, it's not true, don't inflate, we respect any man, becaue I'm Arab...I answer you as an Arab. What are all these stories? You racist, you racist, we respect any man whoever he is."
A Jewish resident: "They sabotage my water tank, they close the passageway when I'm driving the car, they bloke me (my car), they curse me when I pass here. There is a neighbour beside me who said: "I'll remove you from here."
An Arab resident: "In the opposite to your words, I'll ask the Jews if they are satisfied in the neighbourhood or not."
A Jewish resident: "And what about all the firecrackers that they (Arabs) blow up in large quantities in here?"
An Arab resident: "Firecrackers, shmayercrackers, it's when there is a holiday."
A Jewish resident: "What's going on in here?"
An Arab resident: "What's going on in here? You will prevent them (from blowing the firecrackers)?"
A Jewish resident: "I am allowed to throw firecrackers? I'm also not allowed to throw them, there's no such thing."
An Arab resident: "Why not? Why not? Did you throw firecrackers and someone told you not to do that?"
A Jewish resident: "The law forbids you (and me) to do that, there are no firecrackers."
An Arab resident: "Never mind the law."
A Jewish resident: "No firecrackers."
An Arab resident: "No firecrackers? It's only what you want."
A Jewish resident: "No, it's the law."
An Arab resident: "I want firecrackers."
A Jewish resident: "No."

The holiday of the Muslims in which they fire their firecrackers is a day in which some "Allah" gave them orders to kill all Jews, and it's happening in Israel.

They sabotage his life and then they call him racist...

In the future, Israel won't have any opportunity but to expell the Arabs, in this video below, Ehud Olmert said more than 20 years ago that there are 700,000 Arab citizens in Israel. Today there are more than double. In the future they will be the majority and Israel will become an Arab state in which its Arab citizens will behave in the same way they behave in Arab countries, e.g. kill the Jews and themselves, it's not acceptable in my concern.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0v1To8B4_A[/youtube]

The only way in which Arab citizens of Israel won't be expelled is if they will abandon their 1000 night Ali Baba dreams to do a Jihad to the Jews and if they will become a Ger Toshav who accepts the 7 laws of Noach.

compain1.JPG


2signs.JPG


DSCF0270.JPG


You can read more in here.

Or is it that some of you disagree with the rabbi of Lubavitch?

They support their barbaric brothers in Gaza, and when I talk about barbaric brothers, I talk about these kind of people:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b2QhQQpHck[/youtube]

You Europeans think that Arabs are Protestants or Catholics, O boy, you are sooooooooooo wrong!

BTW, Dave, I didn't read your last post in the former page, I stopped from reading your misleading posts.
 
Last edited:
A law removing the citizenship of “unpatriotic” Israelis would not be ethnic cleansing. But, the forceful removal of Arabs (that are not Jews) from Israel and the West Bank and Gaza, “peacefully” shipping them off to Jordan, which is what the Rabbi Meir Kahane indorsed in the video, would be ethnic cleansing. Get a dictionary if you have a problem with what I just said.
It won't be an ethnic cleansing if they are consider to be a threat and an enemy to the state they are living in, and they are, therefore it's not an ethnic cleansing.

will make the US your enemy. I do not like the idea of a war between the US and Israel, and it would make me puke to be allied in your destruction with black stone idolaters that talk to rocks and trees. Please be careful.

I would suggest you read the works of Josephus, starting with “The Wars of the Jews or The History of the Destruction of Jerusalem.“ Please do not make a similar mistake, and make the most powerful nation on earth your enemy. :cool:
As you can see in the video of rabbi Meir Kahane, he was born in America and he knows about America, he said that countries support other countries only because of selfish interests, and if Ameirca will find that supporting Israel is not good for her then she will not support Israel. I want to remind you that America didn't want to supply weapons to Israel in 1948 and the first massive American weapons like jets etc arrived to Israel only in the middle of the 60's.

I have a lot of respect to America, much more than to the other countries in the world, but America will not tell the Jews how to manage their life in their land, well, in second thought, as long as the Jews will stay away from what G-d damands from them e.g. following commandments, then they will have to ask for the help of the gentile countries, it's a very sad situation in which you depends upon the will of others who are not belong to your nation.

There is a famous sentence which says: "Come back to me (G-d) and I'll come back to you (Jews)." And "come back to you" means to do miracles for Israel.

3300 years ago we conquered a land and nobody believed that couple of ex slaves can do that, we had G-d on our side.

If all the Jews in America will leave America and will come back to Israel, believe me, we won't need America any more, we will be the no.1 empire in this world.

And please don't forget that one of the main reasons for the great power of America are the Jews. The Jews have a very important part in making America to what she is now. What will happen when they will all leave America? Who will manage the NBA? Who will manage the American economy? Who will make you movies?

You know that I have details which prove that anti-semitism in America in on the rise?

I would like to remind you what Jews are saying about America:

"In America, we are living on borrowed time. This isn’t really our home. The one and only place a Jew can be a Jew without explaining anything is Israel. That is our true home, our history, and our holidays,"
Full article inside

And to whom they will be loyal if there will be a war between America and Israel:

"According to Ben, Dan was very sensitive to questions of double loyalty that inevitably arose with a kippah-wearing Jewish-American ambassador at the helm. “In the American administration, they always claim that it’s never clear where the Jews’ loyalty lies. When my brother was appointed ambassador to Cairo, the Egyptian press called him ‘Israel’s second ambassador’. When people would ask me who I’m more loyal to, I would always say that if, G-d forbid, a war would break out between the United States and Israel, I would fight on the Israeli side."
Full article inside

How would you feel if I will tell you how to manage your life in America and will say that if you will do things that I won't like then you could loose my support? Do you think that the local American in New York or in Texas really cares what couple of Jews think about him?

Israel did land concessions mainly because of American pressure, those land concessions didn't do good things to Israel, the opposite is true, the Arabs are not afraid of us in the same way that they were afraid from us in the 50's and in the 60's, they allow themselves to do things that they didn't dream to do years before e.g. the last war in Lebanon.

A war between America and Israel will take place!

G-d said through the prophets that the Arabs will arouse all the nations of the world against Israel, it's the Gog and Magog war, a war that started at 9-11, it's a war in which the Muslims will fight the Christians but in some point of this battle, all the nations of the world will aim their war against Israel, this is the last war, and after this war we will also conquer the greater Israel and all the nations of the world will return to follow the 7 laws of Noach.

I don't think that the current regime in America will fight in Israel, I think it will be in the future when their will be changes within the American regime.

The mistake will be if we won't expell them and will let them massacre us Jews as they do in their Arab countries, and believe me, I don't care what some Americans who sit in front of their TV and who don't have any clue about the life in the Middle East, will say.

:cool:
 
Last edited:
If all the Jews in America will leave America and will come back to Israel, believe me, we won't need America any more, we will be the no.1 empire in this world.


“A war between America and Israel will take place!” At this point I wouldn’t be surprised by anything. I am not so sure about our unbreakable ties with Israel.

Just grabbed my old copy of “The Late Great Planet Earth,” it survived the 2004 hurricanes down here is Florida, but don’t take that as a sign; the ceiling collapsed on my head. If I remember that interpretation of the Gog and Magog thing, it was that we wouldn’t be there, as if we simply don’t exist. Some people thought it was us getting nuked by Russia first.

With the current set of Democrats that will be elected in 2008, I bet we won’t be there with our veto if you take the West Bank AND kick the Arabs out.

Please don’t try to make prophecy come true. It is supposed to be a little harder to interpret. There has to be something more than events seeming to fit a pattern. Without a real miracle unexplainable by any science, don’t go running off toward a pillar of fire, you might get burned, because it might just be an Al Quacka accidentally popping off a nuke on his own people before he could get it across the border.

You better be really sure about having G-d on your side. Maybe you should wait for all the Jews in America to come back to Israel. I think our Jews will be voting for a Democrat. So if they don’t come back first, that is a sign it is not the time. OK?

With all the bad people we have here you would think the Jews would run back to Israel. Quite a few people, after rationalizing opposition to our “illegal” occupation of Iraq, simply use the argument that we would do the same (dress in civilian clothes and blow up), I see them on every message board I look at. I have personally seen Democrats give Hamas a “GO FOR IT,” in answer to a question of mine, and then defend the indefensible after I showed them the Hamas charter for their first time to read it:

“ 2). Why not go on record as to whether you agree with your ‘liberal‘ comrade that Osama is ‘playing by the rules of warfare?’ What about Hamas and other terrorist groups?

This one, believe it or not is fairly straight forward... Terrorist groups fight with the weapons they have available... Hamas and other groups don't have airplanes, tanks and the like to fight the Israelis... So they use the only weapons avaiable to them.... The problem I have is the killing of innocent people... If they want to blow up the Israeli military.. GO FOR IT!!” hftp://tinyurl.com/9l5q3/

Civilian disguised terrorists simply are violating the Golden Rule, making it hard to apply, by putting all of us in jeopardy of getting our crotch searched for a salami bomb. There is no Iff I can use on a civilian clothed terrorist, there is one for an F-18. You would think it would be a fundamentally easy thing to accept as a true argument. And I can‘t get that though the head of a Palestinian like Jenin, or even get it through the head of many of our Democrats, to save your life. There is simply too much hate. There simply seems to be a very large segment of our open-minded population, mainly Democrats, that has a moral rot left over from their mantra of “by any means necessary.”

“Howard Dean has said that Hamas’ soldiers—no one has ever called Hamas soldiers before. Howard Dean has said we don’t take sides in the Middle East. We took sides in 1948. Israel’s our ally. We always knew that. We can’t have a president who is conducting American foreign policy by press release clarification, and we’re certainly not going to beat George Bush that way.” (John Kerry Meet the Press (NBC News) - Sunday, January 11, 2004)

John Kerry didn’t think Saddam violations of H32 of United Nations (of tyrants too) resolution 687 were sufficient reasons to enforce the law, so he was no ally.

You guys are supposed to be our allies, but we don’t always act like it. One of the things Oslo did was justify terrorism; their crimes are forgiven; like the one the Palestinians got mad about that we captured in Iraq, you know the one, guy shoved off a cruise ship… Yet, I saw Oslo and Clinton’s plan praised in an editorial in the Daytona Beach News-Journal the other day. I bet the wrong kind of Democrats will run the show after 2008. Once you forgive something you better get something for it that is just as permanent, or it is big mistake. Oslo only gave hope to the terrorists, that any future crimes could also be forgiven too, as there was no punishment for failing to take the deal.

If all the States in the region and the Palestinians stopped violating United Nations (of tyrants too) resolution 242, I bet a “Democratic” President in the mold of what I see in the front runners, would demand the so-called “Palestinians” get all of it back to the 1967 borders. Israel would be forced to fall back and you can bet the terror would continue. Land for “peace.“ Must use law enforcement, but you can‘t do an extrajudicial killing of the leader of a terrorist group, or wage a war on terror, just stomp your feet Israel and tell the Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians, Egyptians, and Palestinians, to police themselves. Just look at Howard Dean and Pelosi for a guide as to what party loves; “We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace.” I would think Damascus would have to say something positive first before it would be logical to say something like that. Whatever you do don’t consider that a war, or regime change, is a legitimate response to State support for terrorism in violation of H32 of UN resolution 687.

I understand why someone would think the only solution is to remove all the Arabs from the West Bank. The situation looks hopeless for real peace. So please wait for all the Jews to come home. :cool:

*****

Ethnic cleansing:
Definition of ethnic cleansing - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

*****

PS. Please don’t leave us here all alone, we love your movies.
 
Back
Top Bottom