• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

A typical debatepolitics thread

cnredd

Major General Big Lug
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 5, 2005
Messages
8,682
Reaction score
262
Location
Philadelphia,PA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
It's an average day on your above average website...

A Conservative politician...could be a higher-up...might not be...doesn't matter...does "something"...could be good...could be bad...

Here's what happens...

*KidRocks starts a thread claiming that the Conservative was following orders directly from Bush himself, since he must be the blame for everything from your bananas ripening too quick to misplacing your car keys. He will attach everything in the article except the line where it says the same thing happened under the Clinton Administration 7 years ago...

*scottyz is annoyed KidRocks got to it first, but nonetheless will give his two cents...which is usually so small he expects a penny change...

*PerryLogan blames the NeoCons...then puts the pacifier back in his mouth...

*Four hours later, danarhea starts a thread with the same topic...except instead of just posting snippets of the article, he gives a delightful and totally fabricated two paragraphs trying to explain what the article says...Then you read the article and find out that it doesn't say anything near it...

*Since it was a danarhea thread started, KCConservative's alarm in his head goes off...Even if he's not near a PC...He runs to the quickest laptop, logs in, and personally attacks every Liberal who responded so far and doesn't come close to addressing the topic...

*Since KCConsevative responded, it's not too long before jfuh comes in to personally attack HIM...also doesn't come close to addressing the topic...

*This exchange goes back and forth for a few posts, making everyone else on this site wish we could just put them in a room by themselves filled with nothing but baseball bats...spiked...

*This thread dies, and we move back to KidRock's thread...

*Stinger sees the thread, then runs to newsmax and links their version of it...and then mentions how Liberal the media is...

*hipsterdufus sees the thread, then runs to mediamatters and links their version of it...and then mentions how Conservative the media is...

*Navy Pride responds to this thread after choosing "pre-written response #4" from his made up list of the same ten responses he uses everyday he keeps in a Word document...and you can take it to the bank...

*aps puts on her cheerleader outfit with the big "DNC" on the front and trashes every politician with an (R) after their name...who and why is not important...

*cnredd responds to aps by showing her that she said the exact opposite thing two weeks ago when the subject matter was a Liberal...He gets chastised for pointing this out...

*oldreliable67 chimes in and points out four books written in the 70s that said the same thing...

*Simon W. Moon sees this, and points out that the third book said "and" and not "or" on page 271...The writes something in Latin...

*Gunny responds to the thread by putting it in a miltary perspective...even if it was about Social Security or malpractice lawsuits...

*teacher draws a picture of himself attacking Paris...The text in the picture is whatever is the first thing to come to mind...whether it deals with the topic or not...

*Stace gives her opinion on it and how it relates to her impending pregnancy...

*Mixedmedia swings by and tries to put the topic in perspective by pointing to the humanity...or lack of it...portrayed...Then she soothes whomever felt offended by anything said in the thread...

*Ivan the eee mentions he's entered the debate...no one cares...

*FinnMacCool tells us what George Orwell would say about it...

*Gandhi>Bush comments on the violence of the article...even if there was none...

*Conflict responds...no one understands a thing he wrote...or why it was written...

*easy65 responds to PerryLogan's comments from two days ago denouncing his venom...by spewing venom back at him...

*Stu Ghatze agrees with everything easy65 wrote...in only 8734 words...

*galenrox sits on his Libertarian fence and points out how both sides suck...with plenty of asterisks...

*aquapub goes through 14 hours of research to disqualify everything every Liberal wrote in the thread...this post gets skimmed over and no one responds to it...

*jallman comments on the thread and cnredd makes a gay reference...jallman trumps it with a threat of sending Naughty Nurse after him...

*Naughty Nurse magically appears and tries to get cnredd to switch teams...

*Steen states her case on abortion...

*Tashah responds...everyone opens up another window and links to the dictionary website...

*ptsdkid is an slobbering idiot...This has nothing to do with anything...I just needed to point this out...

*Trajan responds by linking an article saying the author of the original article stole a quarter when he was 9...Then proclaims all will burn in hell...

*Kelzie shows up, giving more evidence to my theory that she and Trajan are human magnets, and proves him wrong from 16 different angles...

*Trajan changes the subject...

*This will continue until one of them has to go to sleep, and the thread dies...

*Until two months later when a newbie responds with "I disagree"...
 
Well. I see I'm not important. *huffs*
 
*Vergiss responds to the newbie....by pointing out the thread danarhea started , asks the newb if they are indeed 8 yrs old, newbie cries and never comes back
 
cnredd said:
*Navy Pride responds to this thread after choosing "pre-written response #4" from his made up list of the same ten responses he uses everyday he keeps in a Word document...and you can take it to the bank...

I've only ever seen him post two responses. Either speculation on how "Liberals are destroying America" early in the thread, or "We shall see" as a lame retort after his speculation has been shown to be stupid.

cnredd said:
*Four hours later, danarhea starts a thread with the same topic...except instead of just posting snippets of the article, he gives a delightful and totally fabricated two paragraphs trying to explain what the article says...Then you read the article and find out that it doesn't say anything near it...

Haha, very true.

A couple others:
*Scarecrow Akhbar tows the standard Republican line on whatever the issue is, and goes to great lengths to defend George Bush against vicious liberal attacks while calling Bill Clinton a rapist. He then qualifies his statement by claiming to be a libertarian who hates the GOP.

*Alphamale and Jamesrage have a circle jerk while discussing how the plight of the white man today is approximately equal to that of plantation slaves. Someone disagrees, and Jamesrage accuses them of promoting The Homosexual Agenda.
 
Well, at least it all doesn't end in a group hug.
 
cnredd said:
It's an average day on your above average website...

A Conservative politician...could be a higher-up...might not be...doesn't matter...does "something"...could be good...could be bad...

Here's what happens...

That is just crazy fresh clever funny. Awesome.
 

Attachments

  • My guys 112.jpg
    My guys 112.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 50
LOL, yeah that was great cnredd, and exactly why I steer clear of those threads.:rofl
 
Cnredd!

Your actually getting go at this. Well done!

*Ivan the eee mentions he's entered the debate...no one cares...

I am surprised that you actually mentioned me. I'm touched. You forgot the part were I talk shlit about you even though we are in full agreement.
 
You left out Billo comes along and He and Gunny get into a pi$$ing contest.

Cherokee finds the thread and reads the first sentence of one reply and realizes it offended him and tells the person to f.uck off but then sees he made a mistake and apologies. (Stupid hotheaded motherflucker)



PS. Can I see aps in her cheerleader outfit? please......:mrgreen:
 
:rofl Brave cnredd. Specially since I kick TOT's ***. Like usual.
 
My IMPENDING pregnancy? Sweetie, I'm already pregnant. I can't be about to get pregnant if I already am!
 
LOL, This is so funny and true; with 6000+ posts you can see where you get the time to even do this.

Plus, remember that guy who thinks if you criticize Billionaires, your either jealous or your anti-capitalist? That guy is really funny and stupid--and loves to avoid the truth of the matter. So funny,,,, and misinformed.
 
Ivan The Terrible said:
Kelzie



I don't know... You still haven't proven to me that we should have NHC...

What?!? It's CHEAPER! Who can argue with cheaper?
 
Kandahar said:
I've only ever seen him post two responses. Either speculation on how "Liberals are destroying America" early in the thread, or "We shall see" as a lame retort after his speculation has been shown to be stupid.



Haha, very true.

A couple others:
*Scarecrow Akhbar tows the standard Republican line on whatever the issue is, and goes to great lengths to defend George Bush against vicious liberal attacks while calling Bill Clinton a rapist. He then qualifies his statement by claiming to be a libertarian who hates the GOP.

*Alphamale and Jamesrage have a circle jerk while discussing how the plight of the white man today is approximately equal to that of plantation slaves. Someone disagrees, and Jamesrage accuses them of promoting The Homosexual Agenda.

Yeah, but you left out the part where he calls all women who get abortions c***s and hopes they bleed to death. You don't really get the full "Scarecrow-effect" without that.
 
And so what have we learned here: cnredd considers himself superior to eveyone else. But it was very funny!
 
cnredd said:
It's an average day on your above average website...

A Conservative politician...could be a higher-up...might not be...doesn't matter...does "something"...could be good...could be bad...

Here's what happens...

hahahaha laffs:lol:
 
cnredd said:
*Since it was a danarhea thread started, KCConservative's alarm in his head goes off...Even if he's not near a PC...He runs to the quickest laptop, logs in, and personally attacks every Liberal who responded so far and doesn't come close to addressing the topic...

:2rofll: This describes you and me both, redd.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
I can cheaper generally means inferior.

No it doesn't. It means cheaper. Take an econ course, it'll do wonders.
 
Do I know how to call 'em?...:2wave:

From the first post...

Kelzie shows up, giving more evidence to my theory that she and Trajan are human magnets
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
Foakley's are cheaper than oakley's but which is the superior product?

I have no idea what those are.

Cereal that comes in a box vs cereal that comes in a bag. Difference in quality? No. One's just cheaper. Gap vs. Old Navy. Same damn owner, both sell them same crap. One of em just jacks up their prices. Expense doesn't equal quality. It never has.

And shut up redd. :lol:
 
Kelzie said:
I have no idea what those are.

Cereal that comes in a box vs cereal that comes in a bag. Difference in quality? No. One's just cheaper. Gap vs. Old Navy. Same damn owner, both sell them same crap. One of em just jacks up their prices. Expense doesn't equal quality. It never has.

And shut up redd. :lol:


In the history of any nationalized industry the cure has always turned out to be worse then the disease and don't give me that crap about how the French health care is a-ok because their citizenry is taxed out the *** and their economy is in the toilet. It's those unintended consequences that always seem to fuc/k up socialisms good intentions.
 
Back
Top Bottom