To answer for myself.
Mueller is driven primarily, if not solely by partisan motives
No. I am not sure of his motive, but it doesn't appear objective. Partisan is defiantly not the issue. Maybe in the broadest terms protecting the establishment. Ben Shapiro has mused he just has seen so much dirt on the guy he feels him 'bad' even if not criminal by way of the investigation. Definitely possible, from all I know Muller seems like someone of good character, but that doesn't mean that's true either or he doesn't have skeltons.
The intelligence community is in the bag for Democrats
Politicalized members, but again it's more about the political establishment which only became an issue once Trump won the nomination. If Jeb verse Hillary most certainly not.
Do you know the % of our congressional candidates with backgrounds with the intelligence services? It's far above average. What about the statements[e.g. twitter feeds] by the old officials today? Do they seem apolitical?
Mr. Trump is getting rid of corruption in Washington
Indirectly. He is exposing it. He doesn't embrace it which is a good start. It hurts him too though as he alienates key allies. Politics is grey and he is no church boy, but we are better than pre-trump levels certianly.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to retain business interests while being President
Its concerning and would be more so if the media wasn't willing to report on conflicts. Overall though no being a business man should not prevent one from being president or holding public office. I'd rather a Perot but it took a Trump.
I also would note I have a far bigger concerns with how many millionaires there are, who are so because they were politicians. This is a large part of my growing distrust of the "establishment". A common feeling on both sides.
Even if Mr. Trump was negotiating a business deal with Russians while running for President, that's just business
Not on the face.Trump does lots of deals. The degree could be such that it becomes concerning.
America is now respected, no longer reviled as it was during the Obama Presidency
That's complicated, but certainly more respected in the sense of being America instead of a member of the Globalist community.
Mr. Trump's gut is superior to a bunch of climate nerd scientists' science
In short "no is gut is not superior in the slightest"; however,
Public climate change policies do not have a solid record and often do more harm than good. The aim often don't even qualify as meaningful success. It's a discussion and trump could easily be on the wrong side of it. The idea though that its just climate warriors verses denies isn't true outside some town hall.
One sides for the most part is virtue singling and the otherwise is skeptical and confused as to what to do. Climate change is an important and very difficult problem and I respect trump choosing to get out of the way. Our record still improves year to year as it is about people and their choices not government. And people do care and the science gets to be heard.
As for his choice of messaging, it's the way trump speaks and it got him where he is. So awesome. I am not going to fault him.
There's nothing wrong with getting along with Putin. As a matter of fact, it's a plus
True. Of course within reason Putin is no ally.
Mr. Trump got the best of Kim Jong Un
South Korea is very happy and we're not at war. Un got undeserved legitmency true, but the old policy wasn't working. So we adopted a new one. Could change on a dime. We'll see. Trump loves you or hate you so I'd trust him not to hesitate if the tides do turn.
There's nothing wrong with the ever changing positions Trump takes on the Mueller findings
I don't even care if you say lie, to date his statements are consistent with an innocent person. I personally say his "fibs" though as his intentions tend to be marketing/hyperbole rather than for deceptional gain, but that is obviously controversial.
