• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A lawsuit in Georgia claims that nearly 200,000 registered voters were improperly purged.

OscarLevant

Gadfly Extraordinaire
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
16,876
Reaction score
7,397
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

 
Last edited:
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

And now they have Sweaty Rudy making a fool of himself, over and over again, with a bunch of laughably spurious court appearances.
 
Now they have to prove it (same thing I said for the other side.)
 
If any election in recent history deserved contesting, it was the 2018 GA gov race of purging likely Abrams voters so obviously targeted.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck


The ironic mixed blessing was that the only reason Abrams was free to turn the state BLUE for Biden - despite voter suppression - was because she wasn't burdened by the duties of being Governor. The Law of Unintended Consequences.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck


Wait. Several thousand people in Georgia died or moved in one year? They purged them in 2019, an investigation was started and since then that many people? I don't know, there must be something else.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

No one hates democracy more than republicans.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

 
I watched a documentary about crosscheck about three weeks ago. It was stunning. Design flaw in the program my arse. It was intended to purge minorities, meaning mostly dems. One of the worst cases of election fraud I've ever seen and lo and behold it was designed by R's. The party of law and order.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.

What?? You are saying there were 'electoral shennanigans" in Georgia? C'mon man!! We all know that kind of stuff doesn't happen. We have been hearing this for the last month.
Why are you attacking the American electoral system? What are you unAmerican? Don't live in the real world? Can't accept electoral defeat? Why-- you are challenging the very legitimacy of American government. Are you a traitor? Engaging in sedition?
Whats going on here? 'splain Lucy, 'splain.
 
No one hates democracy more than republicans.
The only thing Trump ever said that was true: "if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

“I don’t want everybody to vote,” Paul Weyrich, an influential conservative activist, said in 1980. “As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”
 
The only thing Trump ever said that was true: "if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

“I don’t want everybody to vote,” Paul Weyrich, an influential conservative activist, said in 1980. “As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”

Imagine that, rich Republicans thinking their advantage goes up when fewer people have rights to vote. Is this classical liberalism at its finest?
 
I watched a documentary about crosscheck about three weeks ago. It was stunning. Design flaw in the program my arse. It was intended to purge minorities, meaning mostly dems. One of the worst cases of election fraud I've ever seen and lo and behold it was designed by R's. The party of law and order.

More accurately, the design flaw was by design. Which documentary was it, 'The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" ? That's a good one. Another good one is 'Rigged' viewable for free for Amazon Prime Video members.
 
More accurately, the design flaw was by design. Which documentary was it, 'The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" ? That's a good one. Another good one is 'Rigged' viewable for free for Amazon Prime Video members.
The best democracy. I haven't been able to watched rigged just yet. The best democracy was depressing enough. We have prime too. I watch a lot of different documentaries.
 
What?? You are saying there were 'electoral shennanigans" in Georgia? C'mon man!! We all know that kind of stuff doesn't happen. We have been hearing this for the last month.
Why are you attacking the American electoral system? What are you unAmerican? Don't live in the real world? Can't accept electoral defeat? Why-- you are challenging the very legitimacy of American government. Are you a traitor? Engaging in sedition?
Whats going on here? 'splain Lucy, 'splain.


Republicans are accusing dems of voter fraud ( internally, via rigging the election from within the counting/sorting & machine software apparatus ) which is well nigh impossible on a nation wide conspiratorial basis, whereas republicans cheat externally, via voter suppression, which is absolutely doable, noting that not only is it doable, they do it.

See, republicans have no proof that dems cheat by rigging the vote from within the voting machinery and electioneering apparatus ie., internally' whereas dems have PROOF that repubs do it, externally via voter suppression. Two films document this, 'Rigged" and "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy".

While repubs are taking dems to court, and offering no proof, on a nation wide basis, dems have taken repubs to court, though on a much more limited basis ( in only a few states, getting a judge to order Interstate Crosscheck to cease and desist, and getting GA to restore the purged voters ).
 
The best democracy. I haven't been able to watched rigged just yet. The best democracy was depressing enough. We have prime too. I watch a lot of different documentaries.

Watch "Rigged", Everyone should watch it, especially republicans.
 
Voter ID laws; eliminating multi-day voting; requiring mail ballots to be notarized; prevent past felons from voting; purging the rolls of people with similar names, etc. are all examples of ways to keep Those People from voting.
Because if Those People voted, they’d vote the people in power out.

It‘s really that simple.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck


This is one reason why I am impressed with the current SoS. Perhaps he doesn't have greater ambition.
 
If they win this suit, it means Dems will probably win, and they should, because of the 200,000 that were purged because Kemp said they had moved, well, turns out, the vast majority of them hadn't moved at all, and it was a ploy for Kemp to beat Abrams, which succeeded. He stole the election for himself, as he was GA Secy of State,and SoS's are in charge of the election and he refused to recuse himself.

Greg Palast, the investigative reporter working with the ACLU, uncovered the fact that the vast majority of the purged hadn't moved and were wrongfully purged. Given that the demographic of the purged were mostly in poor neighborhoods, and college students, the strong likelihood is that most of them are democrats, which is why Kemp no doubt purged them in the first place.

Recall that it was Greg Palast, through his investigative work exposing the Kris Kobach's "Interstate Crosscheck" scam, got the program discontinued by a federal judge. He uncovered the fact that 29 states had partnered with Kobach to run their voter registration rolls through his software, and the software was supposed to delete 'duplicate names across states' as this, according to Kobach, was evidence that those states with duplicate names were persons intending to vote twice ( one in each state ). Turns out the program was flawed and biased against minorities. For example, there are a few dozen 'Michael Jacksons', point is, common names, especially names of presidents and prominent citizens, were given to blacks by slave owners (or they chose the names, not sure which ) , and duplicate names are more prominent among blacks than other demographics. Moreover, Palast uncovered the fact that the program did not check SSNs # as claimed, nor did the program check middle names, so the program was purging names that were duplicate but not perfect duplicates. Thing is, people do move, and when they move, they never contact the state that they left and ask to have their names removed from the registration list, so duplicate names are inevitable, but the fact of duplicates DO NOT prove 'intent to vote twice" like Kobach has claimed. The program was so flawed and turning up hundreds of thousands of false positives, that the judge ordered the program to cease and desist. Palast discovered that during the 2016 election, 1.1 million names were purged, and in the swing states, the purged count vastly exceeded the number of ballots cast for Trump. Had those names not been purged, it's conceivable that Clinton might have won, given that he won by a narrow margin.

So, here we have republicans purging innocent persons from voter registration rolls, they closed over 1000 voter booths in the south, causing long lines, and, as such , greatly suppressing the vote, and republicans are now claiming that democrats are trying to steal the election. No, the thieves are republicans.

Let us see how the judges rule on this.


Voter advocacy groups in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Wednesday asking a federal court to compel the state to restore nearly 200,000 names to its voter registration list ahead of the January runoff races for the state’s two Senate seats that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

In the suit, filed in the northern district of Georgia, three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 on the grounds that they had changed their addresses.

The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since the investigation was completed, several thousand voters have died or moved, but more than 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says.

The Georgia A.C.L.U. said in a statement that those removed from the rolls were likely to be “young voters, voters of lower income, and citizens of racial groups that have been denied their sacred right to vote in the past.”


Palast won a lawsuit against Kemp back in February


More information on Greg Palast and Interstate Crosscheck

It's a good idea to check your voter registration multiple times a year to ensure you aren't removed by something like this.
 
Back
Top Bottom