I’ll go with NASA.
If the NASA web site is too overwhelming for those of you who didn't do well in science class, start here: Coloring Page: The Water Cycle – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Then move up to here: Coloring Page: The Carbon Dioxide Cycle – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Isn't learning fun!?!
And the great thing is, these aren't crackpots! It's real science!
Well you always show up uninformed. Now we see your admission.
Tough callWho to believe, NASA and NOAA and climate researchers on a worldwide basis....or a paid shill for big oil.
That one is easy.
Should be required reading:
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
He is from Canada. He has his Doctors degree. And he looks at Climate as a historian.
Says the Greta Thunberg crowd with a straight face.He has no degree in climatology. Therefore his opinions on it are worthless.
At least that's what I'm toll whenever there is a skeptic with say an economics or physics degree.
Says the Greta Thunberg crowd with a straight face.
What level is her climate degree?Greta Thunberg accepts the solid science of climate researchers. We are very proud of her for standing up for her generation. Why are you right wingers so hateful towards your grandchildren that you are willing to leave them a world of environmental destruction?
Who is surprised by that?There is a 0.0% chance I will watch this video
The other side of HIS argument. LolWho is surprised by that?
That you will refuse to look at the otehr side of teh argument?
That such ideas are far too threatening for your delicate mind is such a non-shock.
Who is surprised by that?
That you will refuse to look at the otehr side of teh argument?
That such ideas are far too threatening for your delicate mind is such a non-shock.
He is from Canada. He has his Doctors degree. And he looks at Climate as a historian.
What do you have to lose being educated?
Excellent video. Ofcourse the chicken little man made climate change cult will disagree.
Science is not flawed. Kuhn explains how science works.So paradigms shift. That doesn't mean science is fatally flawed, as many would like to believe.
Because man is not causing climate change. Only left wing cultists buy into man made climate change. Even the scientists pushing it are only after government grant money.There is no "chicken little" or alarmism to it. In matter of fact, the effects of manmade global warming are occurring even faster in many cases than predicted but the climate scientists. It is a fact that it will cause huge economic and environmental problems in the long run. Why shouldn't man attempt to fix that which he is causing instead of a head in the sand approach.
Actually, they are not.There is no "chicken little" or alarmism to it. In matter of fact, the effects of manmade global warming are occurring even faster in many cases than predicted but the climate scientists. . . .
Be sure to hold your cross in front of you while you chant that.Yes, you are all very good at denier talking points.
I wonder if you think NASA understands how science works.Science is not flawed. Kuhn explains how science works.
And none can handle this directly: https://climate.nasa.gov/Yes, you are all very good at denier talking points.
I wonder if you think NASA understands how science works.
And none can handle this directly: https://climate.nasa.gov/