• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven’s Encounter with a *UAP(UFO)

That's correct.

As for the Navy and DNI,
That is the public answer, PR dept answer, their classified answer is what they won't tell us.

I mean, if the whole subject balloons, atmospheric anomalies, etc., one wonders why there would be classified anything, unless:

1. It's a secret black ops special access project
2. It's foreign tech
3. It's other wordly


On #1, why would they be flying special black ops projects during military training exercises, noting that they have been seen all over the world?
On #2., the consensus among many military interviewed is that foreign nations do not have such exotic technology
On #3. They don't want to tell the public, for reasons of public panic and shattering religious beliefs or divulge tech that can be weaponized, to Russia and China.


So, of the three, which seems the more likely?

They have told us they are not going to make a determination, and the question remains open.

But, the banal explanations are appropriate for a percentage of sightings, but not all, and it is that 'not all' that this is directed.
THere are more explinations. They are natural phenomena, most of the time, but they want to cover the bases for when they do have black ops. They do that by having a canned script for everything.
 
Back
Top Bottom