So you believe that firing the
wholly politically motivated 'subpoena cannon' is good governance and is what is 'envisioned in the Constitution'.
Why am I not surprised in the least.
From my view, it's not either good governance, nor is it envisioned in the Constitution, nor is it good leadership, nor is it in the best interests of the nation.
It's little more than the political elite and Democrats conducting their political power offensive, so they can keep their best interests at the forefront of government, rather than the best interests of the nation at the forefront of government.
So the political use of government power by firing the
wholly politically motivated 'subpoena cannon' is what was intended by the constitution?
That surely doesn't seem right in the least.
Yes, Congress has a legitimate role to checks and balances on the executive branch, but this legitimacy doesn't extend to using the House subpoena for solely political purposes, such as the firing of the wholly politically motivated 'subpoena cannon' most certainly is.
Imagine a future where there is a Republican House and a Democrat president, and the House fires a similar 'subpoena cannon', now that the precedent has been set. So every time the White House and the House are in different hands, this is what is to be expected now?
This is not a promising future.
Will of the people? The will of the people and the mob mentality it at present represents doesn't align with this Republic, and the rule of law. Try again.
The rule of law supersedes the 'majority', and it should.
“It’s a republic, not a democracy.”