- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,397
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Well, I guess it's a sad world then, because you behave the exactly the same way. You have excess money that you could give away to people much poorer than you - but you don't. Instead, you keep those dollars for yourself. In your own life, compassion for fellow humans is trumped by a buck.
That's correct. If you tax me and give my money to a stranger in order to pay for his healthcare, then that is "providing healthcare to strangers".
Yea, I'm the one playing word games and you come up with "collective sphere" and "purposes of policy". Need I suggest where you can shove that collective sphere?
It doesn't make healhcare affordable to those who can't afford it. Ask anyone who has received a bill from a US hospital.
Nope. Makes no difference if he's a homeless bum or Jeff Bezos.
Taxes are used to pay for the government, whose responsibilities are determined by representatives elected by 'the people'.
See, no tax can please everyone. Some taxes will be used in ways you approve, others that you do not approve of.
The same is true for EVERYONE. That is the nature of taxation. What is, or what is not 'moral' is ultimately determined by voters, that's it, that's our system, take it or leave it.
I could say the same thing as you do about taxes I don't approve of, but i don't, because unlike you, I UNDERSTAND the collective nature of taxation.
I will go father than that, I'll will do down your shit worthy rabbit hole of propagandizing the issue, okay? I mean, that's where you want to take this, so, hold on to your pecker:
Those who do not understand the collective nature of taxation, 'for the greater good' which can NEVER please everyone, are dumb ass cruel fools whose objective is to kill americans who can't afford health care.
So, you put that where the sun doesn't shine, and while you are doing that, I got bad news for you
there are more of us, than there are of you.