• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 15[W:5] (1 Viewer)

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
New paper finds another 2 non-hockey-sticks in Italy in the journal Climate of the Past

In the past few years paleoclimatology studies of past temperatures have been done all over the world that fail to find a hockey stick, that is, a rapid increase in temperatures leading up to modern times following 2 or 3 thousands years of no significant change in temperatures. This is yet another such study. They looked at pollen that settled to the bottom of a lake in layers over time to make estimates of moisture and temperature. They found that temperatures were warmer in the past than the present over several periods in the past going back 6700 years.

HT: THE HOCKEY SCHTICK
 
Re: A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 15

(Ice core samples) Ice Cores

From this website where a member of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition dumps his stuff Global Warming and Climate Change
 
Re: A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 15

If Lowdown won't listen to reason... no one will stop it.. I say let's Help him BURY the section. (with links to papers he found on watts/shtick Blogs).
FIVE MORE
(and counting) Today alone.
Anyone else?
 
Last edited:
Re: A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 15

If Lowdown won't listen to reason... no one will stop it.. I say let's Help him BURY the section. (with links to papers he found on watts/shtick Blogs).
FIVE MORE
(and counting) Today alone.
Anyone else?

I've been posting about reports in peer reviewed papers on climate science. Why would you object to that?
 
Re: A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 15

Moderator's Warning:
Please stick to the topic which is not the posting habits of the OP.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom