• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Climate Science Headline You Won't See, Part 12

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Simple climate model outperforms IPCC models, demonstrates climate effect of CO2 is miniscule from the Norwegian science news Geoforskning. (Warning: Norwegian language)

A simple model replicates global temperatures back to 1850 and predicts falling temperatures for 2 or 3 more decades.

The model assumes no additional CO2 in the atmosphere between 1850 and now meaning that the additional CO2 has had no effect.

The model assumes that climate is controlled by an overlapping series of cycles including a 1000 year cycle of warming, sun cycles, moon cycles, and planetary cycles.
 
It seems to me that the basic idea of AGW proponents is that once its effects become truely evident, by then it will be too late to do anything about them, so we must accept the theory as fact, ASAP, and implement their desired "solutions" now.
 
It seems to me that the basic idea of AGW proponents is that once its effects become truely evident, by then it will be too late to do anything about them, so we must accept the theory as fact, ASAP, and implement their desired "solutions" now.

The urgency I think comes from their knowledge that they had to get all of the legislation in place before the current warming cycle ended so that they could take credit for the cooling.

They lost.
 
Simple climate model outperforms IPCC models, demonstrates climate effect of CO2 is miniscule from the Norwegian science news Geoforskning. (Warning: Norwegian language)

A simple model replicates global temperatures back to 1850 and predicts falling temperatures for 2 or 3 more decades.

The model assumes no additional CO2 in the atmosphere between 1850 and now meaning that the additional CO2 has had no effect.

The model assumes that climate is controlled by an overlapping series of cycles including a 1000 year cycle of warming, sun cycles, moon cycles, and planetary cycles.

The pictures are interesting. Do you have it in English?
 
The urgency I think comes from their knowledge that they had to get all of the legislation in place before the current warming cycle ended so that they could take credit for the cooling.

They lost.



I don't think they're smart enough to realize that it's a sham.

The profiteers like Gore just saw the opportunity to grab the money and run, so they did. The true believers are true believers.

We are in about the 2nd week of temperatures about 10 degrees below normal in Indy.

I haven't turned the furnace on yet.
 
I don't think they're smart enough to realize that it's a sham.

The profiteers like Gore just saw the opportunity to grab the money and run, so they did. The true believers are true believers.
We are in about the 2nd week of temperatures about 10 degrees below normal in Indy.
I haven't turned the furnace on yet.
I think Somone should stop the attempted (and successful) BURIAL of this section by Lowdown.
FIVE MORE (and counting) Today.
 
Last edited:
I think Somone should stop the attempted (and successful) BURIAL of this section by Lowdown.
FIVE MORE (and counting) Today.

Why don't you respond to the posts and disprove them then?

It's all well and good when it's one of your own doing a similar thing, but anyone else and it must be stopped according to you.. IF the posts are so weak, respond and show it..
 
Back
Top Bottom