- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
- Messages
- 7,621
- Reaction score
- 3,894
- Location
- Idaho
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Any 13 year old girl who is sexually active (rape doesn't count) has some truly terrible parents.People have already answered this for you, because they may be sexually active and at risk for pregnancy. That easy to understand, basic bit of biology, doesn't require you to share your fantasies of wild 13 year old sex parties with us. For ****s sake.....
Prove what?That's nice, now prove it. (Gordy will appreciate that.)
Who are you trying to convince?I'm laughing at you
That's what law is. Criminal law particularly is a baseline morality that the government has decided to enforce on you.I'll give you a hint. The government cannot enforce morality
Well fine if you think it's morally permissible to steal from people then go do it and see what happens.because there are as many ideas of what is moral as there are claims of who is or isn't god and none of them can be enforced without violating the two religious clauses of the First Amendment,.
That's morality.The government can only enforce the loss or infringement of a persons rights/freedoms.
If you can specify, then do it! But I know you can't or won't because your just all BS talk!I can specify it and I just can't give you a term that you will accept because you're in denial.
If I tell you your religion is something will you accept that or will you say no I'm an atheist?
I already know before engaging with you that it's futile.
Whatever makes you think im "triggered?"If I was just making things up why would it trigger you so triggered
You're the one making the affirmative claim, so you bear the burden of proof.No if you would say it's about something else ,God knows what, you prove it, that's the extraordinary claim.
Hardly. I already pointed out the Constitution and federal law. What do you have that even comes close to that? Other than your usual nothing?I discussed the law I pointed out laws that you don't agree with so therefore the law isn't the end all and be all is it?
Massive projectionYes it's a recording of you shucking and driving and dancing around to avoid the discussion.
Not your discussion because your discussion is incoherent.
They dont. Not even a little.If you believe this why do my posts trigger you so much Padre?
Thing quit being so triggered by it.If you can specify, then do it! But I know you can't or won't because your just all BS talk!
Your defensiveness. We thinks the lady doth Protest too much.Whatever makes you think im "triggered?"
Why?You're the one making the affirmative claim, so you bear the burden of proof.
So you're appealing to a moral document to make your argument.Hardly. I already pointed out the Constitution and federal law. What do you have that even comes close to that? Other than your usual nothing?
Massive projection
They dont. Not even a little.
Once again you're making erroneous presumptions.Thing quit being so triggered by it.
Your defensiveness. We thinks the lady doth Protest too much
Because its a scientific, legal, or even philosophical standard of debate.Why?
Nope. Im citing established legal facts. Something you're clearly lacking.So you're appealing to a moral document to make your argument.
Opinion noted.Once again you're making erroneous presumptions.
Based on morality.Because its a scientific, legal, or even philosophical standard of debate.
Legalities of course based on morality.Nope. Im citing established legal facts. Something you're clearly lacking.
Still false.Opinion noted.
Based on morality.
Legalities of course based on morality.
Tell yourself what you need to hear.Still false.
No, i'm telling you what you need to hear, whether you want to hear it or not.Tell yourself what you need to hear.
Everything you say from now on I'll just assume it's a lie.No, i'm telling you what you need to hear,
whether you want to hear it or not.
WhateverEverything you say from now on I'll just assume it's a lie.
IndeedWhatever
RegardlessIndeed
I will let you have the last wordRegardless
Thank you. I will accept your surrenderI will let you have the last word
In her National Review article “When IVF Met MAHA,” (July 2025), Leah Libresco Sargeant questions President Trump’s rallying cry for free IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).
She argues, “The harder it is to marry and have children early in life, the more likely it is that couples will struggle to conceive later. A humane culture is ordered to the physical realities of women’s bodies. It does not view the shifting of births to later in life as neutral.”
If humans took measures to prevent whales or giraffes from getting pregnant when their bodies were ready, that would be considered madness and an offense against the natural world. But we think it’s ok to ignore Mother Nature and refuse to support human mothers who follow the rule of nature, which is to have children while still a teenager.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?