• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A case for teen pregnancy?

Not sure it has a name I suppose you don't want it to.

But the crazy crap you believe.
Looks like you're just making things up and demonstrating your inability to engage in a rational discussion. Yep, keep embarrassing yourself
 
This is highly ironic. I know what Gordy's religious beliefs are.
And we know he just talks nothing more than BS.
But its always funny when someone presumes to know my religion/beliefs because they have nothing of substance or relevance to discuss and try to take cheap shots, which still miss
 
Do yourself and already said it you just didn't comprehend it.
So you can't point out the "lie." Looks like you're still making BS up and proving me right while embarrassing yourself yet again
 
So you can't point out the "lie." Looks like you're still making BS up and proving me right while embarrassing yourself yet again
Again I pointed it out you just didn't comprehend it.

I'm going to use your same tactic on you from now on it's kind of funny how bad you are taking your own medicine.
 
Again I pointed it out you just didn't comprehend it.

I'm going to use your same tactic on you from now on it's kind of funny how bad you are taking your own medicine.
Whats funny is your Pee Wee Herman-esque replies. But then, such juvenility seems to be the best you can do.
 
Whats funny is your Pee Wee Herman-esque replies.
It's beat for beat the same reply you gave me when you couldn't establish facts. And you were trying to make it legalistic argument.
But then, such juvenility seems to be the best you can do.
Again you're calling your own tactic of that. I'm doing the same thing to you that you did to me when you couldn't show that law wasn't based on morality or that law is the supreme dictator of morality.

I think what your problem is is you're not having the discussion you want to have.
 
It's beat for beat the same reply you gave me when you couldn't establish facts. And you were trying to make it legalistic argument.
I did explain it. And considering abortion and personhood are legalistic arguments, its clear you can't address or refute any arguments or points made as they are all over your head.
Again you're calling your own tactic of that. I'm doing the same thing to you that you did to me when you couldn't show that law wasn't based on morality or that law is the supreme dictator of morality.
Of course I demonstrated law isn't based on morality. I cited the foundations of law. You just didn't want to hear it or didn't get it. Or both!
I think what your problem is is you're not having the discussion you want to have.
Dont fool yourself! You've long lost this discussion, even more so when you decided to act juvenile about it. You're inability to understand or refute the points made only further proves that. But as I said, if you want to continue to embarrass yourself and look foolish, be my guest.
 
I did explain it.
No I explained what you asked me to explain as well you just didn't comprehend it. You're asking me to name your religion and you keep it nameless so you can deny it.
Of course I demonstrated law isn't based on morality.
You can't the law is absolutely based on morality that's what the law is for to enforce a basic standard of morality.

So you're just profoundly incompetent on that subject and I won't take anything else you say on it seriously.
Dont fool yourself! You've long list this discussion,
I assume you mean lost when you you said list. That doesn't make any sense to lose a discussion unless it's recorded on something and you misplaced the recording.

A discussion is participation it's not competition. You may say that I lost some imaginary debate you were having in your own mind which fine if you want to believe that we weren't debating each other you were just talking past me. So when you debate exactly the same way Bible thumpers do and it tends to make me think you're the exact same thing just a different flavor.
 
No I explained what you asked me to explain as well you just didn't comprehend it. You're asking me to name your religion and you keep it nameless so you can deny it
How can you know my religion when ypu can't even specify it? As i said, you're just making things up as you go along and making yourself look foolish in the process.
You can't the law is absolutely based on morality that's what the law is for to enforce a basic standard of morality.
Thats nice. Prove it!
So you're just profoundly incompetent on that subject and I won't take anything else you say on it seriously.
Says the one who can't even discuss a legal issue, including actual legality with the law itself.
I assume you mean lost when you you said list. That doesn't make any sense to lose a discussion unless it's recorded on something and you misplaced the recording.
This entire thread is the recording in black and white for anyone to peruse at any time.
At this point, you're not even discussing anything. You're just arguing to argue. But thats been evident since your first post.
 
How can you know my religion when ypu can't even specify it?
I can specify it and I just can't give you a term that you will accept because you're in denial.

If I tell you your religion is something will you accept that or will you say no I'm an atheist?

I already know before engaging with you that it's futile.
As i said, you're just making things up as you go along and making yourself look foolish in the process.
If I was just making things up why would it trigger you so much?
Thats nice. Prove it!
No if you would say it's about something else ,God knows what, you prove it, that's the extraordinary claim.
Says the one who can't even discuss a legal issue, including actual legality with the law itself.
I discussed the law I pointed out laws that you don't agree with so therefore the law isn't the end all and be all is it?
This entire thread is the recording in black and white for anyone to peruse at any time.
Yes it's a recording of you shucking and driving and dancing around to avoid the discussion.
At this point, you're not even discussing anything.
Not your discussion because your discussion is incoherent.
You're just arguing to argue. But thats been evident since your first post.
If you believe this why do my posts trigger you so much Padre?
 
I can specify it and I just can't give you a term that you will accept because you're in denial.

If I tell you your religion is something will you accept that or will you say no I'm an atheist?
This is brilliant, but unintentional, comedy.
 
Yeah and you need to tell me that it's laughter and so that I know that you're not bothered right cuz that's important to me?
That's nice, now prove it. (Gordy will appreciate that.)

I'm laughing at you to the point that iced tea came out of my nose. Your arguments are pathetic.


I'll give you a hint. The government cannot enforce morality because there are as many ideas of what is moral as there are claims of who is or isn't god and none of them can be enforced without violating the two religious clauses of the First Amendment,. The government can only enforce the loss or infringement of a persons rights/freedoms.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…