- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 11,963
- Reaction score
- 3,543
- Location
- Naperville, IL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
The 95% number really seems dishonest to me. I don't see it being that drastically high.
It's Fox "News".... It's bull****.
The 95% number really seems dishonest to me. I don't see it being that drastically high.
The law states who can marry. So then people should have the right to marry as many people as they want
Did you take your own poll or something?
Do gays want to discriminate in the manner the KKK does?
Some do. Let's not pretend that is no such thing as a prejudice gay person.
And I'm sure you have kind of evidence to support your claim, correct?
Is that all you have in response?
But, since you ask:
http://www.libertiesalliance.org/20...transgender-division-now-has-a-facebook-page/
It's Fox "News".... It's bull****.
The state has a legitimate interest in limiting the number of licenses a person can have at a single time. Just as the state can limit the number of driver's licenses or hunting license or fishing licenses, etc. that you can have, the state is allowed to set the number of marriage licenses you can posses to just one. That keeps it fair for everyone and avoids serious complications that arise when people are allowed to have multiple marriage licenses.
Therefore, you comparison is irrelevant.
So you are trying to say that a group that opposes a discriminatory law (Sharia) is discrimination in the same vane as the KKK?
"Oppose Sharia law"?
The EDL is a racial hate group. Today, they hate Muslims. Tomorrow, they'll hate just about everyone; just like all hate groups.
Or, are you going to continue with the, "only white, southern, American, Conservative, straight males can be racist", crap?
No it is not. If gays can marry a man should be able to have as many wives as he wants.
That doesn't make any sense. How does the number of marriage licenses a person is allowed to hold change as a result of allowing to people of the same sex to marry.
So gays need rights but a man that wants multiple wives that hurts no one has no rights.
So gays need rights but a man that wants multiple wives that hurts no one has no rights.
Just FYI, this thread is a hoax. The pentagon just did a huge survey and found that the majority wanted gay people to serve openly in the military. Duh. How could anybody really believe that 95% of our soldiers were bigots? That's ridiculous.
How exactly can he use a legal contract of marriage to assert that his wife has final say in certain legal decisions if he has multiple wives from multiple legal contracts pretty much asserting the same thing? I say if a guy wants to live with several women and call them all "wife", fine. But the legal document of marriage essentially says that the other person in that contract with you has legal say on important matters affecting your life, say that is legally more important than anyone else in your life, including blood relatives. Therefore, if we were to have legal multi-marriages, there would have to be different rules established for settling such issues. Also, how do you settle the case if a man marries a woman who helps him get rich, then marries a second woman to father children for him, but the first woman wants to be able to marry another man as well, eventhough the man doesn't approve? If they decide to divorce over the issue, would she get half his money or a third? What if she was the one to make most of the money during the marriage, then he got married to another woman without her knowing? Would he still be entitled to half of her money or should he be considered committing adultery? What about states that still condemn adultery? Could being married to that other woman without the knowledge of a current wife be grounds for divorce or larger divorce settlement or in some cases criminal charges?
Criminal Adultery: States Ponder The Continuation of Puritanical Laws « JONATHAN TURLEY
I asked you a simple question...are you intellectually incapable of answering it? How does the number of marriage licenses a person is allowed to hold change as a result of allowing people of the same sex to marry?
If you can't answer that simple question then you are talking out of your ass by trying to compare the two. A state has a legitimate interest in limiting the number of marriage licenses any person can hold to one since it would by incredibly complicated, senseless, and completely unfair to allow people to hold more than one. Furthermore, it would serve no state interest to allow people to hold more than one license.
Driscrimination. What is the state interest for gay marriage?
Driscrimination. What is the state interest for gay marriage?
so some discrimination in your eyes is ok? Nice spin to show your bias
Moderator's Warning: |
Impersonating another member is an bannable offense |
i may not see eye to eye with 'conservative', but this is sad, impersonating someone like this.I just don't understand why someone's sexuality deems them as unworthy of being a soldier. I've always wanted to join the military to serve my country but have been hesitant to because of the anti-gay sentiment in the military and I was afraid if the truth about my homosexuality ever came out I'd be harrassed and kicked out. If DADT gets repealed I'm going to join and serve my country as an openly gay man.