• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

911 was used as an excuse to invade Afgan and Iraq (1 Viewer)


Feb 4, 2006
Reaction score
Lakeport CA
Political Leaning
now I'm posting this because it is a government scandle.

And not only that but the towers were blown, Building 7 proves hanky panky was a foot, Building 7 was pre wired to go down.

This is criminal, allowing all those people to die , just so geopolitical visions could be reached by a bunch of people who don't stand for the American way.

Former Reagan Treasury Secretary Questions Twin Towers Collapse


They challenge me to explain why three World Trade Center buildings on one day collapsed into their own footprints at free fall speed, an event outside the laws of physics except under conditions of controlled demolition. They insist that there is no stopping war and a police state as long as the government's story on 9/11 remains unchallenged."

Roberts (pictured above) continues, "They could be right. There are not many editors eager for writers to explore the glaring defects of the 9/11 Commission Report. One would think that if the report could stand analysis, there would not be a taboo against calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations. We know the government lied about Iraqi WMD, but we believe the government told the truth about 9/11."

September 2000: PNAC published Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century:

". . . the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein. . . .
American armed forces stationed abroad and on rotational deployments around the world . . . are the cavalry on the new American frontier."

"Any serious effort at transformation must occur within the larger framework of U.S. national security strategy, military missions and defense budgets. . . . Further, the process of transformation . . . is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
There are plenty of threads to choose from that discuss this very topic. Many people enjoy talking about how 911 was an inside job and how Bush planned and executed the whole thing. You'll find them in the Conspiracy Section. It's that way. ----------------------------------------->
[Moderator Mode]

Moved to the Conspiracy Theories forum...

[Moderator Mode]

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom