- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,868
- Reaction score
- 8,352
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Who is Paul to say these things, though?
Don't the Gospels themselves - through the teachings of Jesus - tell us the works that are necessary for salvation? And who is better-placed to emphasize these obvious facts than His own brother James?
So we have the teachings of Jesus. We have the postscript of James. What need is there - especially after Antioch and the Council of Jerusalem - for Paul? Isn't he essentially obsolete after that point? I see the breaking point for Paul when Barnabas parted company with him... after that, he seems to go off the rails... he starts performing his own "miracles" and starts to move further and further away from the core faith represented by James.
There were two problems is selling this new faith to the Gentiles:
1) Only certain food items prepared in a specific manner - kosher - were to be accepted
AND
2) Male circumcision
One group of the many early Christian sects were the Ebionites who did insist on following ALL of the Law. They were persecuted and eventually erased from history by the 5th century by the established Church.
Paul basically created a new faith when he wrote that following ALL of the traditional Jewish laws were not necessary to become a Christian - as long as you ignored what Jesus supposedly said about the Law and generally behaved like a nice person worshipping this new element of the Supreme Deity.
Matthew 5:18 (NIV) For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.