• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

9/11, show me the proof.

Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
906
Reaction score
183
Location
Maryland
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Have at it, truthers, but be aware: there's a catch.

If you, at any time, utter any of the follow words or phrases (or anything approximating them), you're disqualified.

- "Question authority."
- "Look past surface appearances."
- "Don't just blindly follow X."
- "Do you own research."
- "If you wanted to know, you would've found out by now."
- "Sheep."
- "X just wants you to believe y."
- "Open your mind."
- "Rabble rabble willful ignorance/blindness rabble rabble."
- "The Jews did it."

Good luck!
 
Have at it, truthers, but be aware: there's a catch.

If you, at any time, utter any of the follow words or phrases (or anything approximating them), you're disqualified.

- "Question authority."
- "Look past surface appearances."
- "Don't just blindly follow X."
- "Do you own research."
- "If you wanted to know, you would've found out by now."
- "Sheep."
- "X just wants you to believe y."
- "Open your mind."
- "Rabble rabble willful ignorance/blindness rabble rabble."
- "The Jews did it."

Good luck!

It's all Bush's fault. Oh and by the way, Bush is the devil
 
Damn, it was Satan?

I knew I left something out.

What is sad is the fact that things changed in America from a system that used to always keep government in check to a system that you are a kook if you ever question your government and simply want a new investigation into things because of many discrepencies....

Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves if they seen what America evolved to with an arrogant, sneaky and secretive government, which is non-transparent, and who condemns anyone who questions it and wants a new investigation......I predict another revolution someday because of the direction things are heading in American government and media manipulations...
 
Last edited:
Have at it, truthers, but be aware: there's a catch.

If you, at any time, utter any of the follow words or phrases (or anything approximating them), you're disqualified.

- "Question authority."
- "Look past surface appearances."
- "Don't just blindly follow X."
- "Do you own research."
- "If you wanted to know, you would've found out by now."
- "Sheep."
- "X just wants you to believe y."
- "Open your mind."
- "Rabble rabble willful ignorance/blindness rabble rabble."
- "The Jews did it."

Good luck!

Good post.
 
What is sad is the fact that things changed in America from a system that used to always keep government in check to a system that you are a kook if you ever question your government and simply want a new investigation into things because of many discrepencies....

Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves if they seen what America evolved to with an arrogant, sneaky and secretive government, which is non-transparent, and who condemns anyone who questions it and wants a new investigation......I predict another revolution someday because of the direction things are heading in American government and media manipulations...

you are not a kook for questioning you govt. You are a kook for not realizing how freaking improbable it would be for the govt to pull off something like the 9/11 attacks without someone involved in the conspiracy spilling the beans.

that is what the "truthers" don't get. they are just like the moon landing hoaxers.

The sheer volume of people who would have to keep a secret makes it almost impossible for either conspiracy to have any merit whatsoever.
 
you are not a kook for questioning you govt. You are a kook for not realizing how freaking improbable it would be for the govt to pull off something like the 9/11 attacks without someone involved in the conspiracy spilling the beans.

that is what the "truthers" don't get. they are just like the moon landing hoaxers.

The sheer volume of people who would have to keep a secret makes it almost impossible for either conspiracy to have any merit whatsoever.

Questions don't bother me... baseless innuendo and accusations do.
 
Evidence that 911 was an inside job

Quote, "The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change in 2009-2010

by Elizabeth Woodworth
Global Research, February 15, 2010

GlobalResearch.ca - Centre for Research on Globalization … context=va

Abstract

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account.

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.

This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country's foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge.

Moderator's Warning:
Edited: Fair-Use
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evidence that 911 was an inside job

Quote, "The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change in 2009-2010

by Elizabeth Woodworth
Global Research, February 15, 2010

GlobalResearch.ca - Centre for Research on Globalization … context=va

Abstract

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account.

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.

This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country's foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge.

Interesting...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story? 911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job - RT Top Stories


America's Holy Crusade against the Muslim World.
The American Inquisition

America’s Holy Crusade against the Muslim World.

By Michel Chossudovsky

A “war of religion” is unfolding, with a view to justifying a global military crusade. In the inner consciousness of many Americans, the “holy crusade” against Muslims is justified. While President Obama may uphold freedom of religion, the US inquisitorial social order has institutionalized patterns of discrimination, prejudice and xenophobia directed against Muslims. Ethnic profiling applies to travel, the job market, access to education and social services and more generally to social status and mobility.

The American Inquisition as an ideological construct which is, in many regards, similar to the inquisitorial social order prevailing in France and Spain during the Middle Ages. The inquisition, which started in France in the 12th century, was used as a justification for conquest and military intervention. (See Michel Chossudovsky, 9/11 and the “American Inquisition”, Global Research, September 11, 2008).

The arrests, trials and sentences of so-called “homegrown” terrorists” (from within America’s Muslim community) on trumped up charges sustain the legitimacy of the Homeland Security State and its inquisitorial legal and law enforcement apparatus.

An inquisitorial doctrine turns realities upside down. It is a social order based on lies and fabrications. But because these lies emanate from the highest political authority and are part of a widely held “consensus”, they invariably remain unchallenged. And those who challenge the inquisitorial order or in any way oppose America’s military or national security agenda are themselves branded as “conspiracy theorists” or outright terrorists. (See Michel Chossudovsky, The Demonization of Muslims and the Battle for Oil, Global Research, January 4, 2007)

Moderator's Warning:
Edited: Fair-Use
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All 9/11 truthers should read this book, and join us in reality.

pm-911book.jpg
 
All 9/11 truthers should read this book, and join us in reality.

pm-911book.jpg

The reality is that popular mechanics was created by the "father of yellow journalism"... (yellow journalism being sensationalizing facts to sell more).

Not to mention that NIST essentially debunked PM's article by the second version of the report.... so, I'd hardly call that piece authoritative.

Good for a laugh though.

Even better was the NatGeo special... that's where the 'they want to believe' argument became popular. That's without even getting into the deceptive nature of how that documentary made it to screen.
 
Danish chemist giving an interview on that he and a group of scientists found nano-thermite (!) in dust from WTC 911.

YouTube - Niels Harrit, fra København universitet taler om nano-sprængstof i støvet fra WTC på TV2 News.

The paper never actually says that material in question is nanothermite or even regular thermite.

"These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere" - Dr. Niels H. Harrit.

So it REMINDED them of a substance that no one aside for 9/11 conspiracy people apparently knows anything about? Can they conclusively say exactly what it is? Of course not, but that did not stop him from making this statement on the last part of the research paper...

"Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the
red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted
thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly
energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
" - Dr. Niels H. Harrit.

So in one fell swoop, no, in the same research paper we go from "reminded us of nano-thermite" to "we conclude that the red layer of the
red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted
thermitic material." That is one hell of a jump!

This guy is an idiot and has zero credibility. No wonder the paper was pulled off the Internet, but that's another conspiracy, right? :lol:
 
Last edited:
The reality is that popular mechanics was created by the "father of yellow journalism"... (yellow journalism being sensationalizing facts to sell more).

Not to mention that NIST essentially debunked PM's article by the second version of the report.... so, I'd hardly call that piece authoritative.

Good for a laugh though.

Even better was the NatGeo special... that's where the 'they want to believe' argument became popular. That's without even getting into the deceptive nature of how that documentary made it to screen.

The most masterful cover up in the history of mankind! :lol:
 
Here is the evidence which was given two months ago publicly. The news was censored by so said mainstream media.

Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts


by Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts
Global Research, October 13, 2010
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - 2010-10-04

AE911Truth Delivers the Evidence to the Media: Press Conference - National Press Club – Washington DC

Ed. – This is the actual 10-minute statement read by Richard Gage, AIA, to the media at the AE911Truth press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC on September 9, 2010.
Good afternoon, my name is Richard Gage, AIA. I’m a member of the American Institute of Architects; I’ve been a licensed architect for 22 years; And I’m the founder of the non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth).

As a group, we now have more than 1,270 architect and engineer petition signers. Collectively, we have more than 25,000 years of building and technical experience. This press conference is being given by our petition signers and supporters today in 65 [it turned out to be 67] locations around the world, including 30 states and 4 countries.

Today, we’re here to inform you that we have uncovered evidence that the official investigations into what happened to the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 were deeply flawed, or worse. The scientific forensic facts we have discovered have very troubling implications.

For example, a technologically advanced, highly energetic material has been discovered in World Trade Center dust from the 9/11 catastrophe.

This follows the discovery, by the United States Geological Survey and others, of high concentrations of unusual previously molten iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust. These microspheres can only have been formed during the destruction of the World Trade Center at temperatures far higher than can be explained by the jet fuel and office fires. Those fires, we are told by engineers employed by NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, were allegedly the cause of the World Trade Center’s destruction. The discovery of this advanced energetic material, in the form of red/gray chips distributed throughout the dust, both explains the iron-rich microspheres and confirms the inadequacy of the official account of what happened that tragic day.

Even before the microspheres and red/gray chips had been identified and brought to our attention, we were deeply concerned about other aspects of the destruction of these iconic buildings, and how they were investigated. More than two dozen firefighters, engineers, and other witnesses reported seeing substantial quantities of molten iron or steel, flowing like lava in the debris under all three World Trade Center high-rises. Office fires and jet fuel cannot possibly reach the temperatures necessary to liquefy iron or steel. A mixture called thermite, consisting of pulverized iron oxide and aluminum, CAN generate temperatures above 4000°F -- far more than is needed to melt iron or steel, which melts at about 2750°F.

The energetic material that was found in the WTC dust by an international team of scientists (led by Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark) was reported in the peer-reviewed Bentham Open Journal of Chemical Physics. It consists of nano-engineered iron oxide and aluminum particles 1000th the size of a human hair, embedded in another substance consisting of carbon, oxygen, and silicon. The sizes of the iron oxide particles are extremely uniform, and neither they nor the ultra-fine-grain aluminum platelets could possibly have been created by a natural process such as a gravitational collapse or the impact of jetliners. The red/gray chips in which these particles were found exhibit the same characteristics as advanced energetic materials developed in US national laboratories in the years leading up to 9/11. They have no reason to be in this dust. Given all the horrific costs in human lives, lost civil liberties, and trillions of tax dollars spent in response to the official account of 9/11, there can be no more urgent need than for our country and the world to find out who put those materials in the World Trade Center – and why.
.....

Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts
 
you are not a kook for questioning you govt. You are a kook for not realizing how freaking improbable it would be for the govt to pull off something like the 9/11 attacks without someone involved in the conspiracy spilling the beans.

that is what the "truthers" don't get. they are just like the moon landing hoaxers.

The sheer volume of people who would have to keep a secret makes it almost impossible for either conspiracy to have any merit whatsoever.


No one involved in covering the 9/11 conspiracy would even think about revealing the secrets of the government especially after the government hid from the whole nation and the world to cover up the fact that they are responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
 
No one involved in covering the 9/11 conspiracy would even think about revealing the secrets of the government especially after the government hid from the whole nation and the world to cover up the fact that they are responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

Flame bait.
 
I want proof too! Where is the proof OBL did it? He isn't even wanted by the FBI for it!
Where are those WMDs? Where are the bodies and blood on 911? Where did the planes go that hit the Pentagon?
ETC ETC ETC!
 
What is sad is the fact that things changed in America from a system that used to always keep government in check to a system that you are a kook if you ever question your government and simply want a new investigation into things because of many discrepencies....

Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves if they seen what America evolved to with an arrogant, sneaky and secretive government, which is non-transparent, and who condemns anyone who questions it and wants a new investigation......I predict another revolution someday because of the direction things are heading in American government and media manipulations...

You're either with TSA, or you're a damned extremist now! =D
 
I want proof too! Where is the proof OBL did it? He isn't even wanted by the FBI for it!
Where are those WMDs? Where are the bodies and blood on 911? Where did the planes go that hit the Pentagon?
ETC ETC ETC!

He admitted to doing it on the videos. But the FBI doesn't charge people based on video technology unless it is officially produced so you don't see him being charged.

We were wrong about WMDs. Had nothing to do with 911 however.

DNA of all passengers is accounted for.
Only one plane hit the Pentagon.

Your research into this is very low level I can see. Read the commission report.
 
Back
Top Bottom