9/11 Revisited (new documentary - video) (1 Viewer)

[Mark_P]

Hey everyone,

I am new to this forum.. I typed in "political forum" in google and found this site... great forums guys!

I am just wondering if any of you guys have seen this video called "September 11 Revisited: Were explosives used?" I just saw it today, and I have to say I am speechless. I am just looking for others who have seen it and what you thought about it...

You can watch it online here:
http://www.911revisited.com/video.html

Thank you,
Mark

 

[Spartacus FPV]

Still watching it, interesting so far but if you go through the links they all lead to conspiracy theorist websites claiming "911 was an inside job."

Thats a bold claim to make without any actual evidence. I think investigations should be made into the irregular nature of the WTC collapse. But lets not make any crazy leaps just yet...

If those demolition experts are right and demolition charges could have been planted the week before during powerdowns, we still have no idea who could have placed them. They more than likely would have been placed by the guys casing the place who were planning on destroying it.

 

[massive_attack]

Ya, there is video after video after video of regular joes, cops and firefighters who keep talking about "explosions".

 

[Spartacus FPV]

Ya, there is video after video after video of regular joes, cops and firefighters who keep talking about "explosions".

They also had professional demolitions experts and physicists. Dont forget about the guy from MIT...

 

[Gill]

I think investigations should be made into the irregular nature of the WTC collapse.

Already been done.. look at the NIST report. It's 292 pages, so that should keep you busy for awhile.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1Draft.pdf

 

[massive_attack]

I think they mean a real investigation.

 

[Gill]

I think they mean a real investigation.

Translation: An investigation that confirms my twisted theories.

 

[Wide Latitude]

Translation: An investigation that confirms my twisted theories.

I think what he meant was, "an investigation that actually attempts to explain why the WTC collapsed."

Surely you don't think the NIST report does that - have you read it?