- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,501
- Reaction score
- 3,829
- Location
- Sheffield
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Good point well made.This is probably the most serious discussion I've ever seen here. It's also one of the most complicated and, frankly, it's over my head.
But I thought it might help to say that I once read (or heard) someone speak about the importance for a society to identify an "ultimate evil" to which all other evil can be compared. Through the years since World War II, most of our society (and much of the world) has settled on giving Adolf Hitler that distinction.
But the point is that, once that "ultimate evil" is identified, nothing can be gained by saying that someone else was more evil, and in fact (as is happening on this thread) such a comparison can be taken to mean that the "ultimate evil" wasn't all that bad. Indeed, when you get into that lowest level of evilness, then such comparisons mean nothing--a point that Checkerboard made in post #26.
I'm not saying that this discussion is therefore pointless or can serve no useful purpose--any discussion of history is almost always educational and well worth the time--I'm just saying that, according to the writer or speaker I was citing, it might be just as well to keep that "ultimate evil" in place so that nobody can be accused of trying to elevate Hitler and (probably unintentionally) diminish the atrocities he and his movement brought about.
If I've missed the mark with this post, I apologize in advance, as this is indeed a complicated thread (to me, anyway).
It is probably an aspect of me being a bit on the autistic side. Need for real/hard/physical facts rather than the higher level communication that is "ultimate evil".
Today humans are capable of building a disease that will wipe out all of us. That could happen.
For me there is generally a choice between things(political/social) which are less bad than the alternative and if you have a choice of stuff that is more good than the alternative you are doing well. Be happy.
So I do see Mao as far worse than Hitler. Still neither are the worst possible. I hope they are the worse we will ever see in modern times. (Gengis being worse than either)