• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

70,000 Mysterious Democrat Votes

marke

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2018
Messages
34,752
Reaction score
3,961
Location
north carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
In 2016 democrats claim voting machines failed to record 70,000 black democrat votes. Really? What is it with the democrats and attempts to retrieve 'lost' votes long after the election is over? They have mastered the use of jacking up democrat vote counts after the election is over.

This piece is from the 2016 election:

Skeptical 70,000 black voters abstained from presidential vote

https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-b...9-skeptical-70000-black-voters-abstained-from

Is that so? Democrats somehow divine that black votes were not counted? Are ballots color coded? Have voting machines been corrupted? What is going on here only in democrat precincts?

In 2018 democrats have managed to add more than 70,000 democrat votes to the original total.

Karl Rove: As Florida ballot count battle rages, Democrats are recklessly violating state law
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kar...-democrats-are-recklessly-violating-state-law

Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda C. Snipes said Tuesday night that 634,000 votes had been cast in the county. But by Thursday night, Snipes was claiming 712,840 ballots had been cast. ...

Broward County officials blatantly disregarded the Florida law requiring that all vote-by-mail and absentee ballots be accounted for within 30 minutes of the poll closing.


78,000 new votes added to the count days after the election is over? Why Brenda Snipes broke the law is not important. What is important is that by breaking the law for whatever her reasons she has done damage to the perception of voters that this election is being done fairly and competently. Brenda needs to be replaced for incompetency or for criminal behavior, whatever.
 
In 2016 democrats claim voting machines failed to record 70,000 black democrat votes. Really? What is it with the democrats and attempts to retrieve 'lost' votes long after the election is over? They have mastered the use of jacking up democrat vote counts after the election is over.

This piece is from the 2016 election:

Skeptical 70,000 black voters abstained from presidential vote

https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-b...9-skeptical-70000-black-voters-abstained-from

Is that so? Democrats somehow divine that black votes were not counted? Are ballots color coded? Have voting machines been corrupted? What is going on here only in democrat precincts?

In 2018 democrats have managed to add more than 70,000 democrat votes to the original total.

Karl Rove: As Florida ballot count battle rages, Democrats are recklessly violating state law
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kar...-democrats-are-recklessly-violating-state-law

Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda C. Snipes said Tuesday night that 634,000 votes had been cast in the county. But by Thursday night, Snipes was claiming 712,840 ballots had been cast. ...

Broward County officials blatantly disregarded the Florida law requiring that all vote-by-mail and absentee ballots be accounted for within 30 minutes of the poll closing.


78,000 new votes added to the count days after the election is over? Why Brenda Snipes broke the law is not important. What is important is that by breaking the law for whatever her reasons she has done damage to the perception of voters that this election is being done fairly and competently. Brenda needs to be replaced for incompetency or for criminal behavior, whatever.

I don't know all the details of this. Mail in ballots require hand count, which is time consuming. The reason for the tardy vote counting may have been that it was not humanly possible to hand count over half a million votes with the staff available.

You are very concerned with this breach of law. How many years' imprisonment do you recommend for these criminal slow pokes?
 
I don't know all the details of this. Mail in ballots require hand count, which is time consuming. The reason for the tardy vote counting may have been that it was not humanly possible to hand count over half a million votes with the staff available.

You are very concerned with this breach of law. How many years' imprisonment do you recommend for these criminal slow pokes?
Wait. You’re saying they knew the mail ins would take for ever to count, so they waited till the last minute to do so? Sorry. The law implies the votes are tallied as they are received one by one.
 
Wait. You’re saying they knew the mail ins would take for ever to count, so they waited till the last minute to do so? Sorry. The law implies the votes are tallied as they are received one by one.

If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.
 
If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.

There are timetables because it is hard to count.

If they were received after the deadline they are null and void.
 
If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.

What were the number of mail in votes, they each have their own special envelope you know. They knew how long it would take to tally the ones they couldn’t tally as they came in.
 
If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.

Especially when the cons love to cut budgets for things like this along with fire management. You really have to admire their chutzpah.
 
There are timetables because it is hard to count.

If they were received after the deadline they are null and void.

Was there any claim that the ballots were received after the election. What is the actual law? There may be a deadline for when the ballots were actually mailed to count vs when they are received.
 
I don't know all the details of this. Mail in ballots require hand count, which is time consuming. The reason for the tardy vote counting may have been that it was not humanly possible to hand count over half a million votes with the staff available.

You are very concerned with this breach of law. How many years' imprisonment do you recommend for these criminal slow pokes?

There are a number of problems here which cast a deep shadow over the whole operation. Broward and Palm Beach Counties were the only two which had a problem abiding by state laws. Even the Panhandle turned in their votes on time. Miami-Dade turned in their votes on time. If Snipes was having a problem getting the job done on time she should have told someone before the deadline, not days afterward.

Another problem is that the number of votes cast that Snipes originally reported did not match the number she later settled on after multiple changes over several days.
That number should not have been hard to figure out and she did originally report it when she was required to do so. However, after that number was reported she changed the number several times until, days later, the number had swollen by 78,000 votes. She arrived at those numbers by an unknown and unverified process. Given her history of past voting improprieties she should be disqualified for supervising the process and be replace by someone all the American people and all the people of the State of Florida can have confidence in.
 
Was there any claim that the ballots were received after the election. What is the actual law? There may be a deadline for when the ballots were actually mailed to count vs when they are received.

IIRC the is a deadline for receipt in this case. In some jurisdictions it is postmark driven.
 
If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.

So, all counties but this one democrat county run by a democrat with a history of voting improprieties was able to abide by the law, but this one county decided to amend the law to allow for daily changes to the total until they finally reached a total they could live with? What sort of incompetent nonsense is this?
 
I don't know all the details of this. Mail in ballots require hand count, which is time consuming. The reason for the tardy vote counting may have been that it was not humanly possible to hand count over half a million votes with the staff available.

You are very concerned with this breach of law. How many years' imprisonment do you recommend for these criminal slow pokes?

I would trade all of that for voter identification, and federal rules as to how votes are handled. Only the winners benefit from corruption.

A straight, honest election should not be controversial.
 
President Trump has the option, if he sees there was flagrant voter fraud just from Florida, to null and void all democrat candidates while he declares a 90 day national emergency.
 
In 2016 democrats claim voting machines failed to record 70,000 black democrat votes. Really? What is it with the democrats and attempts to retrieve 'lost' votes long after the election is over? They have mastered the use of jacking up democrat vote counts after the election is over.

This piece is from the 2016 election:

Skeptical 70,000 black voters abstained from presidential vote

https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-b...9-skeptical-70000-black-voters-abstained-from

Is that so? Democrats somehow divine that black votes were not counted? Are ballots color coded? Have voting machines been corrupted? What is going on here only in democrat precincts?

In 2018 democrats have managed to add more than 70,000 democrat votes to the original total.

Karl Rove: As Florida ballot count battle rages, Democrats are recklessly violating state law
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kar...-democrats-are-recklessly-violating-state-law

Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda C. Snipes said Tuesday night that 634,000 votes had been cast in the county. But by Thursday night, Snipes was claiming 712,840 ballots had been cast. ...

Broward County officials blatantly disregarded the Florida law requiring that all vote-by-mail and absentee ballots be accounted for within 30 minutes of the poll closing.


78,000 new votes added to the count days after the election is over? Why Brenda Snipes broke the law is not important. What is important is that by breaking the law for whatever her reasons she has done damage to the perception of voters that this election is being done fairly and competently. Brenda needs to be replaced for incompetency or for criminal behavior, whatever.

It's another leftist ****show.

They're slimy.

Leftists have turned our nation into a Central American Banana Republic.
 
President Trump has the option, if he sees there was flagrant voter fraud just from Florida, to null and void all democrat candidates while he declares a 90 day national emergency.

I believe one reason even republicans are hesitant to blow the lid off voter fraud is they may suspect the massive damage that exposure of the truth may do to our entire electoral process.
 
I would trade all of that for voter identification, and federal rules as to how votes are handled. Only the winners benefit from corruption.

A straight, honest election should not be controversial.

Voters should be required to give the last 4 numbers of their social security when voting. Democrats falsely claim there is no voter fraud but they do not want anything done to prevent the possibility of fraud, proving they do not want the possibility of fraud eliminated.
 
Was there any claim that the ballots were received after the election. What is the actual law? There may be a deadline for when the ballots were actually mailed to count vs when they are received.

Mail in ballots are supposed to be counted and reported the night of the election. There is a reason that is required by law to prevent the possibility of fraud. If Snipes is honest she is also incompetent and should be replaced. If she is not honest she should be taken to jail and replaced. Either way she needs to be replaced.
 
If there are over 500,000 pieces of mail coming in in such a short period of time it will still be hard to get it all done in time. No it doesn't take forever but in may well take more time than allotted by a legislature that has no way of know how great the work load will be.

Miami-Dade has a larger number of voters and they turned in their counts on time. Elections have been stolen in the past by democrats which have not turned in their votes on time and have changed their original tallies in days following the closing of the polls until the democrat gained the number of votes to win. That is blatant fraud and is illegal, whether the crooks are charged or not.
 
In 2016 democrats claim voting machines failed to record 70,000 black democrat votes. Really? What is it with the democrats and attempts to retrieve 'lost' votes long after the election is over? They have mastered the use of jacking up democrat vote counts after the election is over.

This piece is from the 2016 election:

Skeptical 70,000 black voters abstained from presidential vote

https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-b...9-skeptical-70000-black-voters-abstained-from

Is that so? Democrats somehow divine that black votes were not counted? Are ballots color coded? Have voting machines been corrupted? What is going on here only in democrat precincts?

In 2018 democrats have managed to add more than 70,000 democrat votes to the original total.

Karl Rove: As Florida ballot count battle rages, Democrats are recklessly violating state law
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kar...-democrats-are-recklessly-violating-state-law

Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda C. Snipes said Tuesday night that 634,000 votes had been cast in the county. But by Thursday night, Snipes was claiming 712,840 ballots had been cast. ...

Broward County officials blatantly disregarded the Florida law requiring that all vote-by-mail and absentee ballots be accounted for within 30 minutes of the poll closing.


78,000 new votes added to the count days after the election is over? Why Brenda Snipes broke the law is not important. What is important is that by breaking the law for whatever her reasons she has done damage to the perception of voters that this election is being done fairly and competently. Brenda needs to be replaced for incompetency or for criminal behavior, whatever.

I think the one who became famous for this type of activity was Richard J. Daley who was mayor of Chicago for 21 years. When it came to voting, his motto was "Vote early and vote often." Spoken to Chicago Democrats. He also became famous for holding Chicago returns until all the down state ballots were counted, then releasing them. This way he knew how many votes he had to make up to ensure a Democratic win. It has long been suspected that it was Daley's Chicago political machine of getting the dead to vote that cost Nixon Illinois back in 1960.

As to having faith in our election process, I do only to a certain point. Highly partisans will try anything and everything to get their candidate elected. The only way we can be sure about our electoral process, the counting of votes is when one candidate or the other wins by a sizable amount. Close election like in Florida, Arizona this year, the infamous Florida recount of 2000 etc. gives those who want to tamper and play shenanigans with our system a golden opportunity. It seems the ghost of Richard J. Daley is alive and well in Florida.
 
What will these liberals/Demos come up next ?
 
Back
Top Bottom