Well it seems the silent majority does not agree with the members of DP who think profiling is wrong at least the liberals in DP feel that way........This is great to see because I believe strongly in profiliing and whatever else it takes to keep this country safe..........
59% Favor Racial, Ethnic Profiling For Airline Security
59% Favor Racial, Ethnic Profiling For Airline Security - Rasmussen Reports
The Christmas Day terrorist attempt by a Nigerian Muslim on a U.S. airliner has reignited the debate on racial and ethnic profiling in airports, but most Americans agree that profiling is necessary to ensure airline safety.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 59% of adults say factors such as race, ethnicity and overall appearance should be used to determine which boarding passengers to search at airports. Twenty-six percent (26%) say these factors should not be used to determine which passengers to search. Another 15% are not sure.
I don't know why your surprised....He is as liberal as you are, maybe more..........
Of course we should racially profile. Anybody who says otherwise has lost their minds. No point in screening grandma or grandpa. Or mom.
If your 45 or younger, Middle Eastern or are traveling from anywhere in the Middle East or elsewhere, you should be getting profiled by the USA security teams.
So you're saying we shouldn't screen women and old people? What about if "mom" is an under 45 year old middle eastern looking woman? Then do you screen her?
Please clarify what you are meaning by "getting profiled". In the bigger airports most everyone in some way shape or form is being "profiled" based on their actions. The very nature of you deciding that you're going to do something based on the fact they're under 45 and middle eastern in and of itself is profiling, so what FURTHER profiling are you wanting? Or are you meaning that if you're 45 or younger and middle eastern you should automatically be given further screening?
Yes, they should be be given further screenings. Background chekcs, the whole nine yards.
No, we shouldnt screen women and old people.
To be honest, if you are a Middle Eastern person, you should be fully vetted before being allowed to come here or set foot on a plane bound for the USA
Yes, they should be be given further screenings. Background chekcs, the whole nine yards.
I think that's a bit of an overkill. No one is saying that all Arabs or all Scandinavian or all Asians should be blocked or suspected. It's about trends and subtle details that become characteristic of those who commit terrorist acts.
Says the gentleman that is for:
Expanding Government Size
Expanding Government Power
Expanding Government Spending
Expanding Government involvement into private citizens lives
Expanding Government degredation of the constitution
You've yet, and never will, been able to show how I'm so dastardly liberal other than the fact I disagree with you that we need to full out racially profile people.
:roll:
wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong Disney Dude I mean Zyphlin...
So how are they suppose to provide for the common defense?Well, you convinced me my Left Wing Friend. You put forth a stirring argument for why its wrong.
Lets see...
Expanding Government Size
You're wanting all of the TSA to racially profile. This means we at the least are having the government hire trainers to teach people how to do this, meaning adding more people to the government payroll. At worst you're implimenting this TSA wide which is increasing the amount of trainers in a large part, not to mention likely requiring an entirely rewrite of the rules and regulations for TSA which would take employees and man hours, and a branch of the TSA to oversee this new security measure.
Expanding Government Power
Currently, the U.S. Government can no indiscriminately search people for no other reason than the fact they LOOK like a certain ethnicity. You wish to give them this power. Yep, looks like expanding government power.
Expanding Government Spending
As above, training is going to be needed for everyone that's going to be performing this duty which is going to cost a large amount of money. Not to mention the EXTREME constitutionality of this which will lead to lawsuits which will ALSO cost tax payer funds.
Expanding Government involvement into private citizens lives
I know its hard to imagine navy, but muslims and people of arabic ethnicity can be citizens. You're wanting United States citizens to be targeted and singled out based on nothing but the color of their skin or their religion to undergo further screening than an average citizen, thus stating that its fine for the government to indiscriminentally consider one citizen over the next more guilty for nothing but their heritage.
Expanding Government degredation of the constitution
1st, 4th, and 14th.
Please Navy....explain to me this since I'm wrong...
How can we impliment full out racial profiling without increasing the size of government?
How can we impliment full out racial profiling without increasing the spending of government?
How can we impliment full out racial profiling without increasing the power of government?
How can we impliment full out racial profiling without decreasing the integrity of constitution?
Come on Navy, if I'm "wrong" you should be able to explain those things easily.
So how are they suppose to provide for the common defense?
So how are they suppose to provide for the common defense?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?