Yes one was made when they didn't want to invade Iraq the other was made when they did . Funny that ?
Here are some other nuggets that got circulated once Iraq had been chosen as the scapegoat for 9/11
Twenty Lies About the Iraq War | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
Yet for all that BS it was really these guys who were by far the most culpable
Calls to release 28 classified pages about Sept. 11 attacks, Saudi Arabia links investigation | 7online.com
It also transpires that America's teflon buddy is a big supporter of these guys too
Islamic State:
Again, what does it matter today? Do you have a solution for ISIS and their desire for world domination? In real life do you always react vs. being proactive? Again, you don't seem to under evil nor do you understand the conditions in Iraq in 2008 vs. today. You are blinded by an ideology and hatred for GW Bush. You really need to seek help to cure that disease
Read the Iraq War resolution. Please show for me where Iraq was blamed for 9/11
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114/text
GW Bush and his stupidity was the catalyst for ISIS and all that will follow on. If you elect morons to your highest office don't get sniffy when I call them out for their failures
Please tell me why despite that more than two thirds of Americans once believed Hussein was directly involved ? Who fabricated the link
Yes, that is your opinion and part of your BDS. You cannot however explain why there was relative stability in 2008 compared to what is there now. How long have troops been stationed in Germany or Korea? You simply are too naïve and gullible to understand the importance of being proactive instead of reactive
I posted the direct link to the resolution in Congress, a resolution that was approved by a 76-23 vote in the Democrat Controlled Senate. The resolution is self explanatory, get someone to help you read it.
Please post the BS that shows more than 2/3 of Americans believe Saddam Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 and why does that even matter.
So how many decades would you have garrisoned troops there and what would it have cost your taxpayer ? The big difference between Iraq and the likes of Germany or Korea is that those indigenous populations actually wanted them there
WE have housed troops in Germany for decades just like Korea and the cost is basically insignificant in the multi trillion dollar U.S. Budget. I find it quite telling what an expert you think you are regarding Iraq and what the people there want. You buy what you are told and nothing is going to change your mind.
The bulk of Americans didn't read it though did they.
There ya go ....
USATODAY.com - Poll: 70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link
You don't even know what the American people want, so how can you assume they want to fight endless wars?
How are the conditions in Iraq different today than in 2008 when Bush left office?
WE have housed troops in Germany for decades just like Korea and the cost is basically insignificant in the multi trillion dollar U.S. Budget. I find it quite telling what an expert you think you are regarding Iraq and what the people there want. You buy what you are told and nothing is going to change your mind.
Yes but the people of Germany and Korea weren't planting IEDs and sniping at your troops every day so the cost of and extended stay in Iraq would be far from inconsequential
Oh, great, a USA Today Poll thanks so much for the laugh and does it matter what the public read or didn't read? You obviously didn't read it. the facts are in the link, the resolution was posted. I suggest you read it
The American people are tired of war.
Yes but the people of Germany and Korea weren't planting IEDs and sniping at your troops every day so the cost of and extended stay in Iraq would be far from inconsequential
You are missing the point. The fact is the American public didn't read it. They prefered to be led where the administration wanted them to go
You mean after the war was over... nvm
And how long afterwards was the fighting still going on in those theaters ? How long would it have continued in Iraq even despite your very high troop numbers because few Iraqis ever viewed you as liberators ?
Congress read it and the Senate under Democrat control, a Democrat party now that demonizes the war, voted 76-23 to support it. Read the resolution
AS long as it took to assure that our loss of life and treasure were not wasted in vain and that our long term interests were protected
So why did the American public believe something else ? Even years afterwards in 2007 41% till held Hussein as being culpable despite all the evidence to the contrary
More Americans Believe that Saddam Was Directly Involved in 9/11 | Atlantic Review
How many Iraqi terrorist attacks had there ever been on the US before it invaded ?
How many Iraqi terrorist attacks had there ever been on the US before it invaded ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?