• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

307 shootings in 311 days

It is a result of the liberal assault on the family; disrespect for life, disrespect for marriage. A full fledged assault on shared American values. We are living in a post great society world where the left found a short cut to social degradation.....the courts.
We have several generations of over medicated free range boys growing up in a single mother household playing call of duty, watching porn and totally disconnected from society, feeling both entitled and short changed.
It will get worse as long as it is politically incorrect to even discuss the why.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

How is it that "liberals" have assaulted the family again? How do you define the term "liberal?"

Seems to me that the breakdown of the family is also a symptom of a bigger problem, but that could be wrong.
 
Those disenfranchised males, are they all white? Why?

The ones that do these shootings are mostly Caucasian. And I gave the reason in the post you quoted.
 
Hey, if you won't discuss something because it's not politically correct, that's on you. And yes, simple-minded stupidity describes every partisan hack from either side who blames the problems in society on leftists or rightards or 'demographics' (a code word for brown people). Your society is fractured, broken into factions, and stupid, simple-minded people address the problem by doing whatever they can to make it worse. Like saying it's all because of a liberal assault on American values. Stupid, simple-minded crap like that.
I guess I was too subtle. It was you not discussing. I was trying to be tactful.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
I guess I was too subtle. It was you not discussing. I was trying to be tactful.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

What? It was me not discussing? Oh, I don't think over-subtlety is one of your problems. For one thing, I wrote a whole paragraph that you ignored while telling me I'm 'not discussing'.
 
Other first world countries don't have the same problems we do, not nearly to the same degree. We're one of the only countries with a large number of nutters that believe literally everyone should have a gun, even violent criminals.



Chicago is actually a great example. If you take a ghetto and then sprinkle a bunch of guns in, it doesn't somehow make it safer. Let's just end all hatred, that's much easier! :roll:



Wow! We just need to get rid of all hatred! That must be what everyone else did.

No, it is the Democratic Party that wants violent criminals to have guns. That's why they furiously oppose stop-and-frisk.
 
This is the Republican Solution. They want a military-style police state in which Donald Trump is a military-style dictator in the exact same vein as North Korea. That is Trump's goal. That is the modern Republican parties goal. Make no mistake about it that is exactly what they want.

Republicans tell people to get armed guards, then they mock people, like David Hogg, who hire armed guards after Right Wing nuts send them death threats. Go figure.
 
No, it is the Democratic Party that wants violent criminals to have guns. That's why they furiously oppose stop-and-frisk.
Yea, the bold is the only reason to oppose stop and frisk. :roll:
 
In terms of numbers killed, white males are not the highest number - and that despite white males outnumber non-white Muslim males about 100 to 1.

Just start with the Pulse nightclub (Muslim 2nd generation immigrant) - over 100 shot and 49 killed. The reason the statistics (government) used claim white people is because Obama had such as the Pulse designated as not a terrorist action - even though on the phone he said it was - and instead claimed the reason was because he was a frustrated homosexual, blaming the shooting on homosexuality. The same for the Fort Hood shooting ("workplace violence") and generally otherwise any shooting by a Muslim was declared for reasons other than the shooter himself gave.

Statistically to their own population, then and now it remains overwhelmingly more likely you would die in a mass shooting by a Muslim.

However, all gun deaths in the USA of all kinds combined do not hold a candle to how many people are wrongly killed each year by hospital "oops" - over 250,000 PER YEAR.
 
Yea, the bold is the only reason to oppose stop and frisk. :roll:
And the other reasons would be . . .? See, to me it seems kinda weird that someone would oppose stop and frisk and at the same time advocate laws that affect primarily lawful, honest gun owners. Maybe you could explain?
 
I wasn't sure where to put this thread. I didn't want it in the gun control section, as that issue has been beaten to death already, and the mass shootings we're experiencing go a lot deeper than guns per se.

[h=1]Thousand Oaks makes 307 mass shootings in 311 days[/h]


When Obama said that mass shootings just don't happen in other countries to the degree they do here, the Republicans cut the bolded part from his statement and said he was wrong. Trump's contribution to the discussion was to say that the synagogue that was one of the 307 should have had an armed guard.

So, do we now have armed guards at every public gathering where a shooting might occur?



That is far fewer than die by drug overdose, or even by auto accidents. Is it an acceptable number?

The latest shooting happened in California, which has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. Are more restrictive gun laws the answer? I'd say, no.

Do we need to all be armed and ready for a Shootout at the OK Corral sort of incident? Who wants to live in such a society? The romanticized "wild west" never was what was shown in the movies after all. We don't need to create a fantasy world that never existed.

But, why is it that the United States, bastion of liberty, has so many incidents of mass shootings, nearly one a day? What is the sickness in our collective soul that makes it OK to go out and shoot people? Is it related to our appetite for illegal drugs? When more people die of drug overdose than of auto accidents, we should start to wonder why so many want to escape reality via chemicals.

Your thoughts?

I live in Australia and the former Prime Minister introduced tough gun laws after the worst shooting massacre on Australian soil - 35 dead in Tasmania. Since then Australia has NEVER had a mass shooting like the ones that occur almost DAILY in America. There was a knife attack in Melbourne last week and 2 people died and 3 more were injured. The police shot dead the attacker but if he had an assault rifle many more innocent people would have been killed. I feel safe here in Australia. In America I don't.
 
Yea, the bold is the only reason to oppose stop and frisk. :roll:

Because it is not the priority but instead what decided to be irrelevant.
 
And the other reasons would be . . .? See, to me it seems kinda weird that someone would oppose stop and frisk and at the same time advocate laws that affect primarily lawful, honest gun owners. Maybe you could explain?

Read the Fourth Amendment--it's two up from the Second.
 
It is a result of the liberal assault on the family; disrespect for life, disrespect for marriage. A full fledged assault on shared American values. We are living in a post great society world where the left found a short cut to social degradation.....the courts.
We have several generations of over medicated free range boys growing up in a single mother household playing call of duty, watching porn and totally disconnected from society, feeling both entitled and short changed.
It will get worse as long as it is politically incorrect to even discuss the why.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Disrespect for marriage? You mean like the thrice married republicans like trump, gingrich, guliardi, kim davis? Or do you mean unmarried mothers living in sin like Bristol Palin?
 
I live in Australia and the former Prime Minister introduced tough gun laws after the worst shooting massacre on Australian soil - 35 dead in Tasmania. Since then Australia has NEVER had a mass shooting like the ones that occur almost DAILY in America. There was a knife attack in Melbourne last week and 2 people died and 3 more were injured. The police shot dead the attacker but if he had an assault rifle many more innocent people would have been killed. I feel safe here in Australia. In America I don't.

Murder in Australia went up until Australia doubled the number of police. What Australia has that the USA doesn't is Australia does NOT have massive numbers of immigrants nor birthright citizenship. Australia does not have 43,000,000 1st generation immigrants, of which approximately half are in the country illegally.

American liberals always leave that part out and most in their view claim those policies of Australia are unthinkably evil and racist.
 
Murder in Australia went up until Australia doubled the number of police. What Australia has that the USA doesn't is Australia does NOT have massive numbers of immigrants nor birthright citizenship. Australia does not have 43,000,000 1st generation immigrants, of which approximately half are in the country illegally.

American liberals always leave that part out and most in their view claim those policies of Australia are unthinkably evil and racist.

The majority of mass murders in America are committed by US -BORN WHITE MEN. Thousand Oaks, Pittsburgh synagogue, Parkland, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Columbine....ALL committed by white men who were born in the USA.
 
Read the Fourth Amendment--it's two up from the Second.
I suggest you do the same. Seizing weapons "just because . . ." calls fourth amendment issues into question much more than "stop and frisk". Imagine what would have happened if someone had done that in Thousand Oaks. :shock:
 
How is it that "liberals" have assaulted the family again? How do you define the term "liberal?"

Seems to me that the breakdown of the family is also a symptom of a bigger problem, but that could be wrong.

Las Vegas shooter - American born white supremacist trump supporter. Dylan Roof - American born white supremacist. Parkland shooter - American born white man. Pittsburgh synagogue shooter - American born anti-semite. Timothy McVeigh - American born white supremacist. Charlottesville murderer - American born white supremacist. I could go on but I'll let you list all the 'liberals' that have gone on shooting rampages in the US.
 
Liberal assault on the family? Are there really people so simple-minded that they believe crap like that? No wonder your society is so broken with idiots spewing that kind of stupidity.

What do you expect from a country where far right evangelicals blame homosexuals for all the hurricanes and other natural disasters that have occurred. I am expecting Pat Robertson to blame same sex marriage for the Californian bushfires....and his far right 'christian' supporters will believe his BS hook, line and sinker.
 
I suggest you do the same. Seizing weapons "just because . . ." calls fourth amendment issues into question much more than "stop and frisk". Imagine what would have happened if someone had done that in Thousand Oaks. :shock:

Wut??
 
Republicans tell people to get armed guards, then they mock people, like David Hogg, who hire armed guards after Right Wing nuts send them death threats. Go figure.

The republicans attacked President Obama for having armed security guards protecting him , his wife and his daughters. Now we have armed security guards protecting trump, his wife, his 5 kids, their spouses/partners, their grandkids, his 2 ex-wives.... and not one peep from the republicans.
 
This is the Republican Solution. They want a military-style police state in which Donald Trump is a military-style dictator in the exact same vein as North Korea. That is Trump's goal. That is the modern Republican parties goal. Make no mistake about it that is exactly what they want.

Putin didn't give trump the thumbs up for nothing. And while the other world leaders marched in unity to honor the fallen , trump and putin had another one of their special meetings. And none of us will know what they discussed cos noone but a translator is in the room with them. Melanoma didn't march because she was too tired and had a facial at the hotel.
 
In terms of numbers killed, white males are not the highest number - and that despite white males outnumber non-white Muslim males about 100 to 1.

Just start with the Pulse nightclub (Muslim 2nd generation immigrant) - over 100 shot and 49 killed. The reason the statistics (government) used claim white people is because Obama had such as the Pulse designated as not a terrorist action - even though on the phone he said it was - and instead claimed the reason was because he was a frustrated homosexual, blaming the shooting on homosexuality. The same for the Fort Hood shooting ("workplace violence") and generally otherwise any shooting by a Muslim was declared for reasons other than the shooter himself gave.

Statistically to their own population, then and now it remains overwhelmingly more likely you would die in a mass shooting by a Muslim.

However, all gun deaths in the USA of all kinds combined do not hold a candle to how many people are wrongly killed each year by hospital "oops" - over 250,000 PER YEAR.

Middle Eastern Arabs are Caucasian.
 
Murder in Australia went up until Australia doubled the number of police. What Australia has that the USA doesn't is Australia does NOT have massive numbers of immigrants nor birthright citizenship. Australia does not have 43,000,000 1st generation immigrants, of which approximately half are in the country illegally.

American liberals always leave that part out and most in their view claim those policies of Australia are unthinkably evil and racist.

Deranged guy entered a school in China and stabbed several of the students. NOONE died. In America there have been dozens of school shootings - mainly committed by WHITE MEN - and the far right offer thoughts and prayers and nothing else.
 
Your opposing "stop and frisk", a proven anti-crime tactic, while frequently arguing for some form of restricting LEGAL OWNERSHIP of guns.
 
Your opposing "stop and frisk", a proven anti-crime tactic, while frequently arguing for some form of restricting LEGAL OWNERSHIP of guns.

Stop and Frisk violates the Fourth Amendment. It's two amendments down the list from the Second.
 
Back
Top Bottom