- Joined
- Sep 2, 2017
- Messages
- 33,607
- Reaction score
- 5,193
- Location
- GDL/Sweden
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Those javelins are totally brutal. Well done America for supplying them. And great work Ukraine! ++
Those javelins are totally brutal. Well done America for supplying them. And great work Ukraine! ++
Money well spent.
Money well spent.
It's comforting to see that Russian tanks didn't lose the habit of ejecting the turret.There have certainly been some huge advances in anti-tank weaponry in the last few decades.
In fact, in the UK before we made the decision to go with Challenger 3 tanks there was discussion about ditching tanks entirely and using the savings for more mobile assets such as more new Apache's.
Tanks may become redundant in the next decade or so.
Almost every tank does that if you get the magazine.It's comforting to see that Russian tanks didn't lose the habit of ejecting the turret.
There have certainly been some huge advances in anti-tank weaponry in the last few decades.
In fact, in the UK before we made the decision to go with Challenger 3 tanks there was discussion about ditching tanks entirely and using the savings for more mobile assets such as more new Apache's.
Tanks may become redundant in the next decade or so.
Almost every tank does that if you get the magazine.
Those javelins are totally brutal. Well done America for supplying them.
Well, they're held horizontally, but you don't usually need to hold something that weighs that much down so they have some pretty minimal attachment that way.Exactly, because there is nothing holding on the turret. Just gravity.
A large amount of the claimed tanks are the bmp-1 apc which are operated by both ukrain and russia, and not even close to a tank in function.Both the title of this thread and the video are wrong.
The number is not "280 tanks", it is "280 armored vehicles". Yes, it can be a tank. But also an APC, uparmored logistics vehicle, or just about anything else.
You need to pay attention to what your references say, and find ones that are more honest.
any idea what Ukrainians used on this video ?There have certainly been some huge advances in anti-tank weaponry in the last few decades.
In fact, in the UK before we made the decision to go with Challenger 3 tanks there was discussion about ditching tanks entirely and using the savings for more mobile assets such as more new Apache's.
Tanks may become redundant in the next decade or so.
yesUkraine is gonna dominate the scrap metal industry when this is all over.
Money well spent.