25 Points of National Socialism

[RealmOfThePureForms]

Apparantly, Joby is the only honest one among you. *News flash....you "choose to align yourself with nazis and racists"...You have cleared typed on the "superiority or inferiority" of the races. There are many men who are homosexuals, yet have wives. This doesn't make them any less homosexual. Nor does marrying a non-white make you any less a racist.

Newsflash for you the one who is unable to read. I never once said anything about a superior race. I said superior CULTURE. How dumb do you feel now? I have always stood by the fact that there is no such thing as a superior race because there are smart and dumb people in every race. There are factors that make cultures superior or inferior to others. This is the reason why certain cultures overtake others while other cultures simply die out.

You are beyond ignorant. You have taken my quotes in which every response I made had the word culture not race and then you branded me a nazi and a racist. Now, I really am going to the Mod. I have given you your chance to stop falsely tarnishing my reputation on these forums. You have refused so now you can deal with the consequences.

Also, speaking in generalities, Asian women are of a submissive culture (I grew up in Asia). It is fitting that a supremicist be wed to one.

Wow what a totally ignorant comment. Somethine else I will flag for the Mod to see. I have been living in the Philippines since november. The only people who think Asian women are submissive are perverts who look at Asiam women as "things" which obviously means you. I have many friends who are women, and none of them are submissive and if you told them they were submissive they would probably slap you in your face. My wife says and does whatever she wants. You are just sick and perverted with your little fantasies of submissive women. What a completely tasteless and disgusting culturallaly ignorant remark made by you.

There is nothing to your points that any individual with common sense should know. There is no real study necessary. You produced no wisdom and no points worth replying too. Mostly it has just been you stating the obvious, campaigning on it like it is some sort of reachable "plateau," and then defending yourself as a non-racist. There is no denying that the third world is made up of brown and black people. There is no denying that cultures and races prefer to be around their own cultures and races. After stating the obvious....now what? Are you assuming a mission to make it so or simply going to whine and complain about the very thing that people in history have used to start wars? It's nonesense.

Besides all of this, what happened to....
:shrug:

Go ah

ead and keep to your deal racist. Tattle tell and see if any other Mod will entertain your internal confusions as if they haven't been following along with this thread anyway. I have not abused any mod power, despite the fact that you have given cause for me to exercise my duties with your Post# 210. I have simply debated your rediculous dreams of a "Realm of the Pure form." You've exposed your character to the public all on your own and I have simply displayed them in a neat little package for all to see. Maybe you've learned something here about yourself.

Haha you are so ignorant. Realm of the Pure Forms is a place that according to Plato, the soul migrates to upon death. It has nothing to do with race. I'm so glad you have demonstrated your utter ignorance in trying to brand me a racist in any way you possibly can.

You are so full of crap. I was taking about CULTURES not RACES. You are so dense it's not even funny. White Nationalism is not White Supremacism. White Nationalism is preserving white culture, heritage, and history. It is non-violent and states clearly in the rules that there is no such thing as a superior race and that hatred of other races is not something that should be preached or believed in.

I have compiled a nice list of things which you have done to attack my reputation in a most disgusting manner and I will be forwarding your words to the Mod.

So far you have called me a nazi and a racist when I have never spoken a word of racism or hatred of any person based on their race.

You have taken my screen name and in your complete and utter ignorance of philosophy, tried to say that it is a racial slur.

And most offensive of all, you have attacked the woman I love and insulted all Asian women by calling them submissive. Personally attacking me, my wife, and Asian women in general is a violation of the rules of this forum.

 

[Tashah]

Moderator's Warning:

RealmOfThePureForms... I have awarded you warning points for Post#226. If you should reprise that type of post here, I will ban you from this thread.

 

[MSgt]

And most offensive of all, you have attacked the woman I love and insulted all Asian women by calling them submissive. Personally attacking me, my wife, and Asian women in general is a violation of the rules of this forum.

Get over yourself. Dispense with the grandstanding. You were not insulted. You were merely shown your own words and the definition they meet. If you do not like it, do not challenge someone to show you what you said.

It is a fact that in Asian cultures, women are more submissive than they are in other cultures. Individuals are always exceptions. This is why I purposefully typed "in generalities." If your wife is not, then she doesn't fit what is generally fact.

I will apologize.


There. See how easy it is to recognize when someone took great offense to something and to own up to it? You should remember this as you toss words like "inferiority," "superiority," and "white supremicist" around. Or is it only OK until you get offened?

 

[RealmOfThePureForms]

Get over yourself. Dispense with the grandstanding. You were not insulted. You were merely shown your own words and the definition they meet. If you do not like it, do not challenge someone to show you what you said.

It is a fact that in Asian cultures, women are more submissive than they are in other cultures. Individuals are always exceptions. This is why I purposefully typed "in generalities." If your wife is not, then she doesn't fit what is generally fact.

I will apologize.


There. See how easy it is to recognize when someone took great offense to something and to own up to it? You should remember this as you toss words like "inferiority," "superiority," and "white supremicist" around. Or is it only OK until you get offened?

No women are not more submissive. In Eastern culture family comes first. In Western culture individuals come first. So naturally a man or woman will be more likely to obey their family than to go out and make decisions on their own. It's not submission, it's simply a different style of raising their family.

It's nice to know your still calling me a white supremacist. Even nicer to know you got your little mod buddy to give me a warning for defending myself when you call me a racist, a nazi, attack my screen name, and my wife all of which are clear violations of the rules. Wonderful double standard you got going there. Yeah freedom of speech. Freedom to slander, freedom to violate the rules your supposed to be enforcing. Great job. Keep up the double standard :2razz:

 

[Kelzie]

No women are not more submissive. In Eastern culture family comes first. In Western culture individuals come first. So naturally a man or woman will be more likely to obey their family than to go out and make decisions on their own. It's not submission, it's simply a different style of raising their family.

It's nice to know your still calling me a white supremacist. Even nicer to know you got your little mod buddy to give me a warning for defending myself when you call me a racist, a nazi, attack my screen name, and my wife all of which are clear violations of the rules. Wonderful double standard you got going there. Yeah freedom of speech. Freedom to slander, freedom to violate the rules your supposed to be enforcing. Great job. Keep up the double standard :2razz:

Please don't attack mod actions in public. It clearly falls under this:

Insubordination
Applies to posts that are intended to create / continue an argument after a final decision has been made by the staff, and posts that demonstrate carelessness towards staff requests

.

A ten-point warning. If you feel that a mod action is unfair, you are free to discuss it in PM. Consider this a friendly heads up.

 

[Tashah]

Moderator's Warning:

I warned him. He has now also been banned from this thread

 

[Joby]

What just happened?

 

[LeftyHenry]

What just happened?

LOL I lost this thread like 3 pages ago...:doh

 

[Jerry]

So do you liberal whites want to protect your White Christian Heritage? Or will you go to hell with the negros?

Jesus wasn't white..........and Jesus was a Jew........when you die you won't have any race....when you meat Jesus you will be no different than "the negros"........kind of blasts a hole in you cute lil "movement".

Flush that 'movement' of yours down the toilet where it belongs.

 

[jamesrage]

Jesus wasn't white..........and Jesus was a Jew........when you die you won't have any race....when you meat Jesus you will be no different than "the negros"........kind of blasts a hole in you cute lil "movement".

He wasn't supposed to know that,now he'll have to admit that he does like jews.

 

[justone]

My desire to see them destoryed is an act of love for my people. .

So far you real desire is to hurt people you’re claiming you love. Don’t you see how Hitler did hurt Germans? I am not even talking about the image of a civilized nation; I am talking about physical suffering, death and devastation of the German nation. Millions of Germans perished, as well as millions died from wounds and torturing, and slow suffering in Soviets GULAG , millions of German women were raped by Soviet (all kind of nationalities and races) soldiers, and were giving birth to undermen… You have not learned the lesson.

If Germany had not been devastated by WW1 Hitler would not have appear. Devastation of Germany (as well as devastation of Russia and many other countries) was a shared fault of the Western civilization. (You would be blind blaming only Jews. And you would have to surrender, if you give Jews power to start WW1 for some purpose and have such an outcome of the war for some purpose. I hope you are not so blind and irrational to imagine them as an invisible super-powerful enemy. )

If Stalin did not have the vision of Hitler as “the icebreaker of the revolution”, and KDP did not join Hitler in fight against SDP, it is very doubtful he could ever rise to power, as he did.

‘’Believing that the capitalists were already in power in Germany and that the Nazis were likewise bourgeois, Stalin concluded that Hitler in power, rather than launch a revolution against capitalism, would crush moderate socialism, and cause Germany's defection from the western camp and dependence on the USSR. To desperate pleas by German Social democrats for Communist aid against the Nazis, the reply of the Soviet embassy was: the road to a Soviet Germany lies through Hitler. Thus, Stalin bears considerable responsibility for the triumph of Nazism in Germany, which later would prove so costly to the USSR. Even after Hitler assumed power (January 1933), Stalin persisted in regarding France as the chief Soviet foe…’’
Professor Gerhard Rempel, Western New England College.
Generally, Stalin manipulated Hitler. Stalin rightfully calculated that Hitler could not do anything real for Germany, but rather would start turmoil in Europe softening it up for Stalin’s invasion.
For 6 years Hitler distracted Germans blaming Jews and redistributing their possessions, but at the same time he was killing and putting in camp thousands upon thousands of non-Jewish, ‘Aryan’ Germans. Then for the next 6 years he was putting millions of very Aryan Germans as a human sacrifice for his psychopathic ideas.
You have to take a look at reality and compare Stalin’s technological advance at that time with Hitler’s. (I don’t know whether you’d be able to do it; it seems you have no clue about tanks or planes or battlefield stragety or tactics) Hitler distributed wealth of Jews and strived on annexed economies. Stalin advanced the USSR to be the most devastating war machine of all times. When Hitler realized that, he had to attack Stalin. That was not his original intention, that was not his real choice. That was a desperate and suicidal move – and that was his crime against German nation. He saved Europe from Stalin, but he brought to Germany the most terrifying destruction and suffering in it’s history . It could be a lot worse if Americans including Jews did not help British to save at least a half of Germany; if Americans did not help to rebuild Germany cleansing it from Nazis. Nazis brought grief and disaster to Germany. US (including Jews in some way) pulled it out with Marshall’s plan ..
You better learn the lesson. You better use Jews for you advantage, like Bismarck did: ‘’Gerson Bleichroder, Jew, German patriot, and leading banker of his day and country, was Bismarck's expert for all money matters, personal, political, or national during almost thirty years.’’
“Jews participated more in the political life of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the German states in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries as they were emancipated from the traditional status of second-class citizens. The process of emancipation was completed in 1867 in the Austro-Hungarian Empire and in 1870 with the unification of German states into the nation-state of Germany under Otto Bismarck’s guidance.’’
‘’The differences …, though subtle, are significant. These differences are what caused one to be remembered as charismatic, a brilliant leader, and one of the most successful statesmen in history, and the other as repugnant, demonic, and one of the most evil statesmen ever. Summed up, Bismarck knew the appropriate place to stop his policy for the good of the nation, and Hitler did not. Where Bismarck was content to be chancellor and control the nation from behind the scenes, Hitler had to be Der Fuhrer, personally ruling all aspects of the nation with an iron fist. While Bismarck stopped his conquests after reasonable gains and concentrated on strengthening Germany domestically, Hitler attempted to take over the world. And, while Bismarck adopted some oppressive laws in order to strengthen the nation, he never would have committed genocide for these purposes, as Hitler did, killing millions of minorities in concentration camps during his rule.’’

Bismarck would certainly look at Hitler as at an enemy of Germany. He would kill Hitler at the first opportunity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_von_Bismarck
"Fools say that they learn by experience. I prefer to profit by others experience"
- Otto Von Bismarck
You better learn the lesson.
Long live Germany! Death to Nazis!

 

[jujuman13]

To, RealmofthePureForms,
In the end the numbers simply do not lie though. From the very beginning of intelligent man, dating all the way back to over 10,000 years ago. The first art, writing, and safe food storage came from Europe. After that, aside from some Asian countries, there was no equal to European intellect around the world. Before excuses could be made for South America and Africa, Europe and Asia were developing complex philosophical writings. It was the logical pursuit that philosophy granted, which would give birth to the biological sciences, medicine, astronomy, and technological discovery. They all came from Europe or a nation created from Europeans.

Not so my friend.
The very first writings came from the Middle East, as did Philosophy, Mathematics (in fact it was a Mid East society that developed the concept of using a zero in mathematics), Astronomy, Agriculture, food storage (although the Chinese were the first to use ice for food storage).
Africa were able to build city's when the Europeans were still running around in animal furs. Biology, Medicine, Electricity, all technological discoveries were all discovered in the Middle East.
European inventiveness in modern times is I have to agree with you, without parallel.
South American tribes had a form of storage of information, to date only 3 of their books have been discovered that somehow managed to escape the destruction wrought on their civilization by the Europeans and the European Catholic Church.
Now in case you think I am saying this because I am jealous of the Europeans, I feel I should let you know I was born in London, England and was educated and lived there for more years than I care to remember.

 

[justone]

Africa were able to build city's when the Europeans were still running around in animal furs. Biology, Medicine, Electricity, all technological discoveries were all discovered in the Middle East.
European inventiveness in modern times is I have to agree with you, without parallel.
South American tribes had a form of storage of information, to date only 3 of their books have been discovered that somehow managed to escape the destruction wrought on their civilization by the Europeans and the European Catholic Church.
Now in case you think I am saying this because I am jealous of the Europeans, I feel I should let you know I was born in London, England and was educated and lived there for more years than I care to remember.

There is no need to explain where you were born and educated when you are pointing to facts. Facts do not take personal excuses.
The fact is that you get it all wrong. Simple goggle search says so.
All from wikipedia: Formed by combining the Greek βίος (bios), meaning 'life', and λόγος (logos), meaning 'study of', the word "biology" in its modern sense seems to have been introduced independently by Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus (Biologie oder Philosophie der lebenden Natur, 1802) and by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (Hydrogéologie, 1802).
The practice of medicine developed gradually, and separately, in ancient Egypt, ancient China, ancient India, ancient Greece, Persia and elsewhere. Medicine as it is practiced now developed largely in the late 18th and early 19th century in England
Most of our knowledge of ancient Hebrew medicine during the 1st millennium BC comes from the Old Testament of the Bible which contain various health related laws and rituals,
"The commands concern prophylaxis and suppression of epidemics, suppression of venereal disease and prostitution, care of the skin, baths , food, housing and clothing, regulation of labour , sexual life , discipline of the people , etc. Many of these commands, such as Sabbath rest, circumcision, laws concerning food (interdiction of blood and pork), measures concerning menstruating and lying-in women and those suffering from gonorrhoea, isolation of lepers, and hygiene of the camp, are, in view of the conditions of the climate, surprisingly rational."(Neuburger: History of Medicine, Oxford University Press, 1910, Vol. I, p. 38).
Italian physician Girolamo Cardano returned to the subject of electricity in De Subtilitate (1550)[1], distinguishing, perhaps for the first time, between electrical and magnetic forces. In 1600 the English scientist William Gilbert, in De Magnete, expanded on Cardano's work and coined the modern Latin word electricus from ηλεκτρον (elektron) the Greek word for "amber", which soon gave rise to the English words electric and electricity.He was followed in 1660 by Otto von Guericke, who invented an early electrostatic generator.
But the point is that one does not have to search in order to be able to see what you're saying yourself: ‘’’European inventiveness in modern times is I have to agree with you, without parallel.’’’ You have to understand that European inventiveness has not come from nowhere. It has very long roots and traditions starting from the Bible. Some people call it Judea -Christian Civilization. It has its root in ancient Greece and Rome and North Africa. Due to reasons which are irrelevant to this discussion – those roots could grow in different directions, but they grew in Europe. It all started on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea – it included a thin slice of the North Africa of course, but it did not include Africa in your meaning. It was spreading to Europe, but it did not go to Africa or Asia.
The main mistake, I think, racists, like you are, do is that you do not understand that an important feature of our civilization has been its inclusiveness- (but not a diversity!) The greatness of our civilization is that has been able to assimilate people of all races, nationalities and gender. (Sometimes assimilation was difficult; and blood was poured to preserve the civilization itself.)
You would be interested to know about: Anthony William Amo who gained fame in Germany for his philosophical studies. Born on the Gold Coast around 1700, he was taken to Amsterdam by the West India Company when he was about 10 years old and was presented to the Duke of Wolfenbüttel. He was baptized in Wolfenbüttel in 1707 and given the names Anton and Wilhelm in honor of the reigning duke and his son
The first black to attain high recognition in Russia was Abram Hannibal, the African slave who became a favorite of Tsar Peter the Great and was the maternal great-grandfather of Pushkin, the single most revered figure in all of Russian culture.
Among the few fairly prominent black figures in Dutch history who at least briefly caught the public eye, the earliest was the former slave Jacobus Capitein,
Black saints were proclaimed in parts of medieval Europe when the Holy Roman Emperors, beginning with Charles IV's ascension in 1346, adopted blacks into the iconography ..
Of course, there are a lot of nuances and a whole book can be written, but the point is that racists, like you and SySgt, are totally wrong. Hearing that Realmo’s wife is an Asian, SySgt concludes that she is submissive as all Asian women are… I may think she, like Lennon’s wife, - assimilated, -belongs and carries values of our civilization better than Aufag with his tribal and barbarian views does. I don’t judge people by shades of their skin and nationality. You can say Einstein and Osama bin Laden have the same African ''ancestry ', - it is true – but they belong to totally different and opposing civilizations. I am not sure with which civilization you are allying yourself . I ally myself with White- European, -Judea- Christian – Founding Fathers’ Civilization, the same as Forum and his wife are allying their selves with . It is quite possible you and I are enemies. This means I may not be able to post a reply, as well as RealmofthePureForms cannot do it – bashed and banned by your kind.

 

[Auftrag]

So far you real desire is to hurt people you’re claiming you love. Don’t you see how Hitler did hurt Germans? I am not even talking about the image of a civilized nation; I am talking about physical suffering, death and devastation of the German nation. Millions of Germans perished, as well as millions died from wounds and torturing, and slow suffering in Soviets GULAG , millions of German women were raped by Soviet (all kind of nationalities and races) soldiers, and were giving birth to undermen… You have not learned the lesson.

So because the German people were attacked, tortured, murdered and raped by the Soviets, that was Hitler's fault?

Hitler never wanted to enter the second world war. Hitler always believed that Churchill would side with him against Russia. Obviously that never happened, but Hitler never wanted to fight Britain.

Hitler lost the war to Russia for two reasons, including the fact that he invaded three months after the original schedule because he went to Mussolini's aid.

Hitler was not responsable for the fact that the Soviet army were ruthless against the German people.

If Germany had not been devastated by WW1 Hitler would not have appear. Devastation of Germany (as well as devastation of Russia and many other countries) was a shared fault of the Western civilization.

That's completely irrelevant.

(You would be blind blaming only Jews. And you would have to surrender, if you give Jews power to start WW1 for some purpose and have such an outcome of the war for some purpose. I hope you are not so blind and irrational to imagine them as an invisible super-powerful enemy. )

The jews were a large dominent economic and political authority, just like they are now.

If Stalin did not have the vision of Hitler as “the icebreaker of the revolution”, and KDP did not join Hitler in fight against SDP, it is very doubtful he could ever rise to power, as he did.

Even if that's true, who cares?

 

[MSgt]

Hitler never wanted to enter the second world war. Hitler always believed that Churchill would side with him against Russia. Obviously that never happened, but Hitler never wanted to fight Britain.

.....................:shock: Anybody want to take this?

I guess by Hitler invading country after country, he was merely telling continental Europe and Britain that he didn't want to get into a World War, much less start one. I guess he was really telling Britian to come out for the big win. :roll:

If only he would have been content slaughtering Jews within his own borders. We all know that "Old Europe" is willing to respect sovereignty no matter what monsterous acts are being conducted.

The jews were a large dominent economic and political authority, just like they are now.

....the true "Master Race?"


So far, I have seen a whole lot of whining and "victimhood" claims from the great Nazi power. "It's all the Jews or the Russian's fault." Is their anything in history you people don't re-write? Did the Nazis land on the moon in 1963?

 

[justone]

So because the German people were attacked, tortured, murdered and raped by the Soviets, that was Hitler's fault? [/QUOTE ]

1. Germans people were not attacked.
2. Bismarck told you not to even think about starting war with Russia.
3. It was all Hitler’s fault, as well as Dresden and rubbles of British bombarding. If you start a war for your Nazi purpose you will get the same – Germans will be killed in masses. This is exactly what you want for Germans .Because of his Nazi nature Hitler had to start wars and he got what he was asking for. Rule #1: You cannot create a Nazi or a communist or a fascist state not starting a war with surrounding nations.
4. Don’t be childish.

Hitler never wanted to enter the second world war. Hitler always believed that Churchill would side with him against Russia. Obviously that never happened, but Hitler never wanted to fight Britain.

Not true, neither in Main Kampf nor anywhere else Hitler was thinking about war with Russia. He HAD to attack Russia and started thinking about it only when he realized that he did not have a choice. It did not matter whether Hitler wanted war with GB – the matter was whether Stalin wanted Hitler to start the war. It shows how Stalin manipulated Hitler. You are fond of Stalin’s puppet.
In 1939 Hitler divided Poland between Stalin and himself – that was the act of Stalin and Hitler starting WW11. Hitler (if he was Bismarck) could bail out – he did not. Stalin would have to wait and/or go alone, thus putting himself against GB and US. (Stalin would have attacked Romania, not Poland in such scenario)
Shortly, you can BS around, but in Hitler’s manner you on the first BS yourself with such statements and you are swimming in your BS. Wars were Hitler’s only way of surviving. He was totlly different from Bismarck.

Hitler lost the war to Russia for two reasons, including the fact that he invaded three months after the original schedule because he went to Mussolini's aid.

Hitler lost the war because he could not win – that was the only reason. Russia was a military superpower. Bismarck told you:…. There was no way for Hitler to win. And it is you fantazy about the schedule: he could not invade 3 month before:
Because:
1 Soviets were not yet concentrated on the border – and that was his only chance. He could not attack Soviet army dispersed evenly in Russia – that could form a deep strategical defense. In June Stalin concentrated all troops on the border and completely abandoned any chance of forming strategical defense.
2. It was planned only on the 22nd of June as the longest light day in the year – that gave an additional advance to blitzkrieg strategy. BTW Germans field generals (many of them, as German patriots were not found of Hitler) learned blitzkrieg and tank wars in Stalin’s military Academies.
3. March or April – as you fantasize - would bring disaster for junky Germans tanks on Russian roads.
4 Who ever told you such things has no clue about military strategy and tactics of that time.

Hitler was not responsable for the fact that the Soviet army were ruthless against the German people.

You have to have some logic. Hitler burned Jews, wanted to enslave Slavic people, wedged wars against all established diplomacy – and he was expecting a nice treatment for his people? Soviet regime was ruthless to its own people. British ruthlessly bombarded Germany – that all was Hitler’s fault. Don’t be childish.

That's completely irrelevant.

It shows how Stalin manipulated Hitler. You are fond of Stalin’s puppet. Also it shows that Germans did not prefer Hitler, but Stalin did, as well as a large German dominent economic and political authority did.

The jews were a large dominent economic and political authority, just like they are now.

This is a typical complain and feeling of people with a complex of inferiority. I hope I would have time to get back to you and upbeat you a little bit – this is a separate subject – how to deal with such a feeling. The subject discussed above was mainly about recent German history and your intention to resolve your complex by returning to the worst moments of the history. You have not replied to the most of my points, just making some childish statements that allies were supposed to treat Germans good when Germans led and deceived by Hitler were supposed to commit their atrocities. And your second statement is that Hitler could win the war and enslave Slavic people – just 3 months behind schedule – You have no clue – I showed you the facts and reality. You have never cared about refuting them.

 

[Auftrag]

1. Germans people were not attacked.

And?

2. Bismarck told you not to even think about starting war with Russia.

I don't care what Bismarck said about anything at any time.

3. It was all Hitler’s fault, as well as Dresden and rubbles of British bombarding. If you start a war for your Nazi purpose you will get the same – Germans will be killed in masses.

That is the inevitability of war.

This is exactly what you want for Germans .Because of his Nazi nature Hitler had to start wars and he got what he was asking for. Rule #1: You cannot create a Nazi or a communist or a fascist state not starting a war with surrounding nations.

That's conjecture, not an argument.

4. Don’t be childish.

:roll:

Not true, neither in Main Kampf nor anywhere else Hitler was thinking about war with Russia.

Wrong!

From Mein Kampf

"The external security of a people is largely determined by the size of its territory. The Russian Empire in the East is ripe for collapse; and the end of the Jewish domination of Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state."

Nation and Race

Eastern Orientation or Eastern Policy

He HAD to attack Russia and started thinking about it only when he realized that he did not have a choice.

That's historically inaccurate and no credible historical source has ever asserted such a thing. The invasion of Poland and Russia were specifically for the policy of Lebensraum or "living space" which is a fundamental tenet of National Socialist beliefs.

It did not matter whether Hitler wanted war with GB – the matter was whether Stalin wanted Hitler to start the war. It shows how Stalin manipulated Hitler. You are fond of Stalin’s puppet.

That makes no sense.

In 1939 Hitler divided Poland between Stalin and himself – that was the act of Stalin and Hitler starting WW11. Hitler (if he was Bismarck) could bail out – he did not. Stalin would have to wait and/or go alone, thus putting himself against GB and US. (Stalin would have attacked Romania, not Poland in such scenario)
Shortly, you can BS around, but in Hitler’s manner you on the first BS yourself with such statements and you are swimming in your BS. Wars were Hitler’s only way of surviving. He was totlly different from Bismarck.

I have no idea what your obsession with Bismarck is, but it has nothing to do with National Socialism or Hitler, you strange person.

Hitler lost the war because he could not win – that was the only reason.

Of course he could win it. It was always a possibility right up until 1942.

Russia was a military superpower.

That's also not true. Russia had a large force, but it was hardly a superpower.

You have to have some logic. Hitler burned Jews, wanted to enslave Slavic people, wedged wars against all established diplomacy – and he was expecting a nice treatment for his people? Soviet regime was ruthless to its own people. British ruthlessly bombarded Germany – that all was Hitler’s fault. Don’t be childish.

How can I take you seriously when you first tell me to be logical, make an illogical argument and then tell me to stop being childish because I don't accept your rambling.

I have no idea what you're twittering on about.

It shows how Stalin manipulated Hitler. You are fond of Stalin’s puppet. Also it shows that Germans did not prefer Hitler, but Stalin did, as well as a large German dominent economic and political authority did.

Are you arguing that the German people overwhelmingly voted for Hitler in the 1933 election because they wanted Stalin to control them?

This is a typical complain and feeling of people with a complex of inferiority.

That's a medical fact is it?

I hope I would have time to get back to you and upbeat you a little bit – this is a separate subject – how to deal with such a feeling.

I think it's completely absurd that you can attack my political and racial beliefs towards the jew by claiming I have an inferiority complex. This is an ad hominem attack and has absolutely no basis in objective reality.

The subject discussed above was mainly about recent German history and your intention to resolve your complex by returning to the worst moments of the history. You have not replied to the most of my points, just making some childish statements that allies were supposed to treat Germans good when Germans led and deceived by Hitler were supposed to commit their atrocities.

First of all, I haven’t replied to the points in your post because a) I have no idea what you're talking about and b) the bits that I do are so fantastical I really have no idea what to say.

Further more, I have no claimed that the allies were supposed to "treat Germans good" I have said that Hitler did not want war with Britain, which is a fact.

And your second statement is that Hitler could win the war and enslave Slavic people – just 3 months behind schedule – You have no clue – I showed you the facts and reality.

What facts? You have quoted some academics in reference to Bismarck. What on earth do these things have to do with anything?

Further, it is a common known fact propagated by Professor Sir Ian Kershaw that the reason Hitler lost during Operation Barborossa was because of the Russian winter.

Hitler pushed the Soviet army back to the gates of Moscow. The reason he lost that battle was because of the Russian winter. The invasion of Russia happened too late. If, like I and Sir Kershaw have said, Hitler had invaded three months earlier which was the original plan, he would have succeeded.

You have never cared about refuting them.

There's barely anything of interest to refute.

 

[jujuman13]

The practice of medicine developed gradually, and separately, in ancient Egypt ancient China, ancient India, ancient Greece, Persia and elsewhere. Medicine as it is practiced now developed largely in the late 18th and early 19th century in England
Most of our knowledge of ancient Hebrew medicine during the 1st millennium BC comes from the Old Testament of the Bible which contain various health related laws and rituals,

Egypt is in the Mid East, & yes Hebrew which implies Jewish which by implication is Israel, I do believe that is also in the Mid East.
Your research failed to mention Babylonian, in what is now Iraq.
Electric batteries, ancient scripts were found during excavations.

With regard to Medicine, attempts to practise this have been and indeed are still to this day being attempted by peoples that can describe their society as something akin to civilization.


This means I may not be able to post a reply, as well as RealmofthePureForms cannot do it – bashed and banned by your kind.

I think that you are in actual person "RealmsofthePureForms", simply changed your aka and reentered the thread.

I do think of myself as being a Racist, I also think that most folk (including you) are also Racist to some degree, to me it is something that is (unfortunately) inherent in our ID as humans.
Ok so you are going to tell everyone that 7you as pure in thought as driven snow, while I would not dream of calling you a liar, I do think you should look real real deep into your own heart before you start attempting to insult other folk.
These threads are for serious discussion, not for trading insults or inuendo's.