- Joined
- Sep 29, 2018
- Messages
- 19,157
- Reaction score
- 9,099
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
It makes sense that all the teams who had at least two first rounders did well. The wide inconsistency in ranking the other teams is emblematic of what was a very murky draft class. Draft grades are useless without delving into the context of why a team chose a player when they did. Ranking the Broncos and Browns without including Wilson and Watson doesn’t make sense. The problem is the people doing the rankings have their preferences of players who may or may not fit in with the needs or scheme fit of a team. They are also unaware of future contracts of current players. They are looking more about hiw good a player is now whereas teams are projecting for the future.Here's a grid of rankings. No surprise that PFF loved the Chiefs. They picked four players from the PFF top 25. The range is very divided about Seattle.
I’m inclined to think whoever gave a D or F grade hasn’t looked deeply enough into the players or situation.