• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2016 Republican Presidential Primary (2nd Poll, this time multiple choice)

2016 Republican Presidential Primary (Pick as many as you want)


  • Total voters
    25
There is no question the GOP has some good candidates capable of taking down "The wicked witch of the west."

LOL....like who? Fred Thompson (or as you call him "the Savior of the Republican Party").....Huckabee? Jindal? Santorum?....or better yet.....Ted "Green Eggs and Ham" Cruz? BWAHAHAHAHA......the GOP doesn't have a decent front runner right now. Who is going to come out of the wings to save your beloved GOP NP?
 
Rand Paul is about the only good candidate from either primary mainstream party. Everyone else is just too many parts crazy for my liking.
 

Vote for Ted Cruz and eat green eggs and ham. Am I gonna vote for him? Yes I am. I will not vote for Huckabee, nor will I vote for Santorum, you see. I will not vote for that guy Mitt, his policies are complete s***. I might vote for Senator Paul, and watch Hillary's campaign fall.
 
Rand Paul is about the only good candidate from either primary mainstream party. Everyone else is just too many parts crazy for my liking.

Rand Paul is good. But Ted Cruz is too.

Don't put a candidate's "sanity" into question. Everyone in the world is a little crazy.
 

Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Bobby Jindal - are NOT doing harm. I don't care what the liberal media paints it as.

So you are wrong about the naive part. I think people who disagree with those candidates are naive.

I agree about how mediocrity is bad.

And, there are always write-in candidates. So it would be unpatriotic to not vote at all. I'm not saying vote for the bad candidate, but vote for a write-in if you have to.
 
Rand Paul is good. But Ted Cruz is too.

Don't put a candidate's "sanity" into question. Everyone in the world is a little crazy.

Yeah, but there is definitely a scale, and when there's too much, you know...

As to Senator Cruz, he's too McCarthyish for my liking. And, he wasn't born in the United States.
 
America can't be that evil that they will support the murdering of babies. Don't call it pro-choice since the baby doesn't have a choice.

where in my post did i mention "murdering babies" lol
 

Yep, I doubt he will go far in the primaries. But here is hoping. Unlike the current president I think Webb knows the value of keeping the party across the aisle on friendly terms even if you battle them till the cows come in. A bit of give and take can lead to a very successful presidency if one knows when and how much, plus on what.
 

nothing wrong with looking at it that way but in 2016 i think social issues will be big in america and may give some surprises to the numbers and averages
 
Sadly for the Republicans, they cannot gerrymander state boundaries.

The electoral college must be respected.

Any talk of a candidate must be able to win the EC, no matter how they might do in the total popular vote.

So, when it comes to choosing a candidate and his running mate ..

.. Think hard, Republicans .. think very, very hard.

Personal pet ideology is meaningless if you're, once again, on the powerless outside looking in at all that executive power you so foolishly traded for your adamant ideological stand.
 

1.) who said im jazzed about it and who said "everyone" is? oh thats right not me its ANOTHER thing you make up
2.) I agree i myself have "reservations" about it but thats another fact you ignore
3.) hey look MORE dishonesty . . notice where i said pro-life/anti-choice . . . . . see the slash? weird i mentioned TWO names but you only focus on one cause it feeds the emotions you have but not reality. Some people are in fact anti-choice, they want abortions banned completely. These people are the minority of course but they exists and i will always call these extremists anti-choice. Your "feelings" about that are meanignless, just more biased emotion.
4.) its not a claim its reality, my stances is in FACT in the middle. I want legislated rights for the ZEF and abortion limited. I dont want it mostly or completely banned, i dont want it mostly or completely unlimited. My stances in in fact in the middle. By definition my view on this is in fact centrist. Use dishonesty and emotion to disagree with that fact all you want it wont change.
 
I am offended where people can talk about murdering babies like it's an acceptable thing. Do you think God wants that? NO!
 
nothing wrong with looking at it that way but in 2016 i think social issues will be big in america and may give some surprises to the numbers and averages

Anything is possible. More than the social issues I will be watching the economy from now until 2016. It was the number issue in this years election, 45% cited it as their most important issue and 78% stated that they were worried about their and the nation's financial future. Healthcare was next at 19% and immigration third at 11%. Social issues never made the list, ISIS, Ebola, dissatisfaction with government, the deficit were all in single digits.

For social issues to rise the economy has to improve quite a bit in my opinion.
 

but we seen poll concenrs and voting turn out very different many times.
Presidential elections are very different than others IMO.

I personal would love if people voted on economy, jobs, education, healthcare for president as a group but ill have to see it to believe first.
 

Everything matters, but everything works together, like a ripple effect or even a domino effect. Want a better economy, don't create any gun laws, the Constitution has spoken, so more gun stores will open, creating more jobs and letting business flow. That's one example. Plus less gun crimes that have a cost on society, since gun control always helps the bad guys since they don't follow those laws anyway, so why should the good people be screwed over?

It all matters, but the social issues matter more to me. Economic stuff bores me a little bit more than the other stuff. But since it's politics it doesn't bore me. Only by comparison to other things it would.

We do need a President with a strategy for destroying ISIS.
 
Romney should have been on the list.
 
The strongest ticket Republicans could run would be Romney with Ron Paul as his VP to cover his Right and religious rightwing flank.
 
The strongest ticket Republicans could run would be Romney with Ron Paul as his VP to cover his Right and religious rightwing flank.

Are you serious? If Romney runs chances are he will not pick a VP that also ran last time. Your statement is ridiculous.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…