I have said numerous times I am speaking of Marxism. Please try to keep up.
Moving on, while Marx may have said he didn't believe in a gov't or classes, he also recognized the need for them. Of course, as long as it was his party in power. From the Communist Manifesto: “The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: Formation of the proletariat
into a class, overthrow of the bourgeoisie society,
conquest of political power”. Distrust of gov't doesn't equate to no gov't. John Locke distrusted gov't, yet he knew that it could exist with the properly instituted and
properly observedchecks and balances. Karl Marx distrusts gov't, yet knows that he would be fine with it if his party is it.
Now, let's look at the 10 planks you listed.
1) The abolition of the property/ownership of land.
While this could never fully be put in practice, it is being perpetrated by the Obama administration in a few ways that are creative and deceptive. First, by "bailing" out businesses they are essentially taking ownership of previously private property. Second, by advocating to "relieve" some mortgage holders by purchasing their property or allowing them to default on their mortgage. Third, allowing student loan recipients to default on their debt. This debt is the property of the school.
2) Income tax to be graded to income – the more an individual earned, the more they paid. The less you earned, the less you paid.
Uh, yeah, he advocates for this at every campaign stop. By using European countries as the example of it not being unusual further proves my point as the Eurpeans are about 10 years ahead of us on the downward spiral to socialism.
3) Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
In keeping with the theme that this country is the hardest of all to institute socialist ideals, Pres Obama begins the slow roll of this much like FDR did with a larger gov't.
Obama Estate Tax Budget Proposal Keeps Wealthy Jumpy - Bloomberg
4) The confiscation of all property of immigrants and rebels.
Agree on this. Neither side has any clue how to tackle immigration so they just spit rhetoric.
5) The centralisation of all credit into the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive economy.
We do this more everyday with Pres Obama advocating for more control by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve IS this plank. And Pres Obama loves him some Federal Reserve interference with the economy.
6) Centralisation of all means of communication and transport into the hands of the state.
Obama gives himself control of all communication systems in America — RT
Just because the Federal gov't doesn't actively control it, doesn't mean they don't have the ability.
7) The extension of factories and the instrument of production owned by the state. Bringing into cultivation all land not being used that could be and an improvement in the fertility of the soil.
The Federal gov't owns over 650 million acres of land, over 30% of the country, easily making it the largest land holder in the US. In addition, each time the Federal gov't bails someone out, provides "stimulus" money, etc they own that business. Also, see Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
8) The equal obligation of all to work and the establishment of an industrial and agricultural armies.
Who called him the Welfare President? Oh, you are just quoting Fox News and thought I would just agree with that huh? Like I said earlier, President Obama doesn't hit all of the planks. Hitting this plank would be troublesome for him seeing as how he needs the votes of those people he needs to work.
9) The combination of agriculture and manufacturing industries with the gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by the more equable distribution of the population over the country.
See above. I guess no one can be a perfect Marxist (what an oxymoron that is)
10) Free education for all children in public schools. The abolition of child labour in factories; an educated child would be better for society in the long term, than a child not educated.
No need to debate this. I think this is one thing that all people in the world can agree with. However, it shouldn't be totally free unless a child's family proves they can't afford it.