Her statement may have been an expression of frustration, and even seem angry, but it was also rational analysis, and not the anality of conspiracists.
Let's consider Josie's post, if we may, and see how rational and accurate it really is:
She says we all saw both planes crash into the Twin Towers. George Bush made essentially the same claim, and somebody had to inform him that very few people actually saw the first strike, simply because unlike the second strike, there were almost no cameras recording the strike. Nearby residents who did see it called NYPD 911 and reported it, but "we all" did not see it.
So like Dubya's statement, Josie's is not accurate.
She claims that the buildings were built to fall into themselves, certainly an original statement as far as I know. Original, but unsupported. Who said that? The architects have not, nor have the engineers. Josie said that, nobody else. What building is made to "fall into itself"? Perhaps you can elaborate Manc, as to how rational or accurate that claim is.
Then she says that radical islamists (wow, Barack would never say that :mrgreen
did it and rejoiced in it. Well, all things considered, that can be claimed, but cannot be proved, neither by the government nor by Josie. The only record about rejoicing, at least in the US, shows a handful of Israelis rejoicing, as they filmed it from the NJ side of the river.
So tell me Manc, just how rational and accurate is Josie's statement?